First Department of Cardiology, Athens University School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;76(4):397-406. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000894.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has produced serious turmoil world-wide. Lung injury causing acute respiratory distress syndrome seems to be a most dreaded complication occurring in ∼30%. Older patients with cardiovascular comorbidities and acute respiratory distress syndrome have an increased mortality. Although the precise mechanisms involved in the development of lung injury have not been fully elucidated, the role of the extended renin-angiotensin system seems to be pivotal. In this context, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), an angiotensin-converting enzyme homologue, has been recognized as a facilitator of viral entry into the host, albeit its involvement in other counter-regulatory effects, such as converting angiotensin (Ang) II into Ang 1-7 with its known protective actions. Thus, concern was raised that the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors by increasing ACE2 expression may enhance patient susceptibility to the COVID-19 virus. However, current data have appeased such concerns because there has been no clinical evidence of a harmful effect of these agents as based on observational studies. However, properly designed future studies will be needed to further confirm or refute current evidence. Furthermore, other pathways may also play important roles in COVID-19 transmission and pathogenesis; spike (S) protein proteases facilitate viral transmission by cleaving S protein that promotes viral entry into the host; neprilysin (NEP), a neutral endopeptidase known to cleave natriuretic peptides, degrades Ang I into Ang 1-7; NEP can also catabolize bradykinin and thus mitigate bradykinin's role in inflammation, whereas, in the same context, specific bradykinin inhibitors may also negate bradykinin's harmful effects. Based on these intricate mechanisms, various preventive and therapeutic strategies may be devised, such as upregulating ACE2 and/or using recombinant ACE2, and exploiting the NEP, bradykinin and serine protease pathways, in addition to anti-inflammatory and antiviral therapies. These issues are herein reviewed, available studies are tabulated and pathogenetic mechanisms are pictorially illustrated.
持续的 COVID-19 大流行在全球范围内造成了严重的混乱。肺损伤导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征似乎是最可怕的并发症,约发生在 30%的患者中。有心血管合并症和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的老年患者死亡率增加。尽管肺损伤发展的确切机制尚未完全阐明,但扩展的肾素-血管紧张素系统的作用似乎至关重要。在这种情况下,血管紧张素转换酶 2(ACE2),一种血管紧张素转换酶同源物,已被认为是病毒进入宿主的促进剂,尽管它参与了其他的代偿性作用,如将血管紧张素(Ang)II 转化为具有已知保护作用的 Ang 1-7。因此,人们担心增加 ACE2 表达的肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂可能会增加患者对 COVID-19 病毒的易感性。然而,基于观察性研究,目前的数据缓解了人们对这些药物的担忧,因为没有临床证据表明这些药物有不良影响。然而,需要进行适当设计的未来研究来进一步证实或反驳当前的证据。此外,其他途径也可能在 COVID-19 的传播和发病机制中发挥重要作用;刺突(S)蛋白蛋白酶通过切割促进病毒进入宿主的 S 蛋白来促进病毒传播;中性内肽酶(NEP),一种已知可切割利钠肽的内肽酶,将血管紧张素 I 转化为 Ang 1-7;NEP 还可以代谢缓激肽,从而减轻缓激肽在炎症中的作用,而在相同的情况下,特定的缓激肽抑制剂也可能否定缓激肽的有害作用。基于这些复杂的机制,可以设计各种预防和治疗策略,例如上调 ACE2 和/或使用重组 ACE2,以及利用 NEP、缓激肽和丝氨酸蛋白酶途径,以及抗炎和抗病毒治疗。本文综述了这些问题,列出了可用的研究,并以图示形式说明了发病机制。