• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

核医学中的患者安全:识别警戒和改进的关键战略领域。

Patient safety in nuclear medicine: identification of key strategic areas for vigilance and improvement.

机构信息

Medical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2020 Nov;41(11):1111-1116. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001262.

DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001262
PMID:32769813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7556244/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the types of patient safety incidents and associated harm in nuclear medicine practice.

METHODS

This study included 147 patient safety incidents related to nuclear medicine practice and submitted to the incident reporting system of a tertiary care nuclear medicine department between 2014 and 2019.

RESULTS

The top-three incident types according to the International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS) were medication/IV fluids (36/147, 24.5%), clinical administration (28/147, 19.0%), and clinical process/procedure (27/147, 18.4%), altogether comprising 61.9% of incidents. Within the medication/IV fluids domain, half of incident subtypes were attributable to supply/ordering, omitted medicine or dose, and wrong dose/strength of frequency. Within the clinical administration domain, appointment and wrong patient represented the majority of incident subtypes. Within the clinical process/procedure domain, the majority of incident subtypes fell in the categories: specimens/results and incomplete/inadequate. There was no patient harm in 145 (98.6%) of cases, mild patient harm in 1 (0.7%) case, and in 1 (0.7%) case, it remained unclear if there was patient harm. In 4 (2.7%) cases, a Prevention Recovery Information System for Monitoring and Analysis evaluation was performed because of the high risk of reoccurrence and patient harm.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patient safety incidents in nuclear medicine occur in three main ICPS categories (medication/IV fluids, clinical administration, and clinical process/procedure, in order of decreasing frequency). These can be considered as key strategic areas for incident prevention and patient safety improvement. Nevertheless, the rate of actual patient harm was very low in our series.

摘要

目的

确定核医学实践中患者安全事件的类型及其相关伤害。

方法

本研究纳入了 2014 年至 2019 年期间向一家三级核医学部门的事件报告系统提交的 147 例与核医学实践相关的患者安全事件。

结果

根据国际患者安全分类(ICPS),发生率最高的三种事件类型为药物/静脉输液(36/147,24.5%)、临床给药(28/147,19.0%)和临床过程/程序(27/147,18.4%),共占事件总数的 61.9%。在药物/静脉输液领域,一半的亚型归因于供应/医嘱、漏用药或剂量、以及用药错误或剂量/频次错误。在临床给药领域,预约和错误的患者占多数。在临床过程/程序领域,大多数亚型属于标本/结果和不完整/不充分。145 例(98.6%)患者无伤害,1 例(0.7%)为轻度伤害,1 例(0.7%)伤害情况尚不清楚。由于再发风险和患者伤害高,4 例(2.7%)患者进行了预防恢复信息系统监测和分析评估。

结论

核医学中大多数患者安全事件发生在三个主要的 ICPS 类别(按频率递减顺序分别为药物/静脉输液、临床给药和临床过程/程序)中。这些类别可被视为事件预防和患者安全改进的关键战略领域。然而,在我们的研究系列中,实际发生患者伤害的比例非常低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a9c/7556244/ea9fcb364ed1/nmc-41-1111-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a9c/7556244/d3cc398b45af/nmc-41-1111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a9c/7556244/ea9fcb364ed1/nmc-41-1111-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a9c/7556244/d3cc398b45af/nmc-41-1111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a9c/7556244/ea9fcb364ed1/nmc-41-1111-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient safety in nuclear medicine: identification of key strategic areas for vigilance and improvement.核医学中的患者安全:识别警戒和改进的关键战略领域。
Nucl Med Commun. 2020 Nov;41(11):1111-1116. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001262.
2
Patient safety incidents in radiology: frequency and distribution of incident types.放射科的患者安全事件:事件类型的频率和分布。
Acta Radiol. 2021 May;62(5):653-666. doi: 10.1177/0284185120937386. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
3
Patient safety incident reports related to traditional Japanese Kampo medicines: medication errors and adverse drug events in a university hospital for a ten-year period.与日本传统汉方药相关的患者安全事件报告:一所大学医院十年间的用药错误和药物不良事件
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Dec 21;17(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-2051-2.
4
Magnitude of error: a review of wrong dose medication incidents reported to a UK hospital voluntary incident reporting system.错误幅度:对英国一家医院自愿事件报告系统报告的错误剂量用药事件的回顾。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Sep;28(5):260-265. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-001987. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
5
6
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
7
Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports.老年人不安全初级保健的来源:对患者安全事件报告的混合方法分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):833-839. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx044.
8
Challenges to the Implementation of the World Health Organization's International Classification for Patient Safety in Slovenia.在斯洛文尼亚实施世界卫生组织患者安全国际分类法面临的挑战。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2023;32(2):94-104. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000356. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
9
A review of medication incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System in England and Wales over 6 years (2005-2010).英国和威尔士国家报告和学习系统上报药物事件回顾:6 年时间(2005-2010)
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):597-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04166.x.
10
Unit-based incident reporting and root cause analysis: variation at three hospital unit types.基于科室的事件报告与根本原因分析:三种医院科室类型的差异
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 21;6(6):e011277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011277.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Implementation of a Professional Practices Evaluation during Radiopharmaceuticals Administration.放射性药物给药过程中专业实践评估的开发与实施
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;10(11):2247. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112247.

本文引用的文献

1
Classifying Safety Events Related to Diagnostic Imaging From a Safety Reporting System Using a Human Factors Framework.基于人为因素框架对安全报告系统中与诊断成像相关的安全事件进行分类。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Mar;16(3):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
2
Creating a Radiology Quality and Safety Program: Principles and Pitfalls.创建放射科质量和安全计划:原则和陷阱。
Radiographics. 2018 Oct;38(6):1786-1798. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180032.
3
Never Events in Radiology and Strategies to Reduce Preventable Serious Adverse Events.
放射科的“永不事件”及减少可预防的严重不良事件的策略
Radiographics. 2018 Oct;38(6):1823-1832. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180036.
4
Classification of patient-safety incidents in primary care.初级保健中的患者安全事件分类。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jul 1;96(7):498-505. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.199802. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
5
Recommendations for Nuclear Medicine Technologists Drawn from an Analysis of Errors Reported in Australian Radiation Incident Registers.基于对澳大利亚辐射事件登记册中报告的错误分析得出的核医学技术人员建议。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2016 Dec;44(4):243-247. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.116.178517. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
6
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
7
Rating and Classification of Incident Reporting in Radiology in a Large Academic Medical Center.大型学术医疗中心放射学事件报告的评级与分类
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;45(4):247-52. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
8
Patient safety: the landscape of the global research output and gender distribution.患者安全:全球研究成果与性别分布概况
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 12;6(2):e008322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008322.
9
Key Concepts of Patient Safety in Radiology.放射学中患者安全的关键概念。
Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1677-93. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140277. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
10
Nuclear medicine incident reporting in Australia: control charts and notification rates inform quality improvement.
Intern Med J. 2015 Jun;45(6):609-17. doi: 10.1111/imj.12758.