• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports.老年人不安全初级保健的来源:对患者安全事件报告的混合方法分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):833-839. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx044.
2
A mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incidents involving opioid substitution treatment with methadone or buprenorphine in community-based care in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士基于社区的美沙酮或丁丙诺啡类药物替代治疗中涉及阿片类药物使用障碍患者安全事件的混合方法分析。
Addiction. 2020 Nov;115(11):2066-2076. doi: 10.1111/add.15039. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
3
Learning from patient safety incidents involving acutely sick adults in hospital assessment units in England and Wales: a mixed methods analysis for quality improvement.从英格兰和威尔士医院评估病房中急性病成年人的患者安全事件中学习:用于质量改进的混合方法分析。
J R Soc Med. 2021 Dec;114(12):563-574. doi: 10.1177/01410768211032589. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Analysis of the nature and contributory factors of medication safety incidents following hospital discharge using National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from England and Wales: a multi-method study.利用来自英格兰和威尔士的国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)数据对出院后用药安全事件的性质和促成因素进行分析:一项多方法研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Mar 16;14:20420986231154365. doi: 10.1177/20420986231154365. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Dentistry in England and Wales: A Mixed-Methods Study.英格兰和威尔士初级保健牙科中的患者安全事件:一项混合方法研究。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1383-e1393. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000530.
6
Patient Safety Incidents Involving Sick Children in Primary Care in England and Wales: A Mixed Methods Analysis.英格兰和威尔士初级医疗中涉及患病儿童的患者安全事件:一项混合方法分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002217. eCollection 2017 Jan.
7
8
Harms from discharge to primary care: mixed methods analysis of incident reports.转诊至基层医疗所带来的危害:对事件报告的混合方法分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):e829-37. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687877.
9
The effects and preventability of 2627 patient safety incidents related to health information technology failures: a retrospective analysis of 10 years of incident reporting in England and Wales.与医疗信息技术故障相关的 2627 起患者安全事件的影响和可预防措施:对英格兰和威尔士 10 年来事件报告的回顾性分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jul;1(3):e127-e135. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30057-3. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Nature of Blame in Patient Safety Incident Reports: Mixed Methods Analysis of a National Database.患者安全事件报告中的归咎性质:对国家数据库的混合方法分析
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Sep;15(5):455-461. doi: 10.1370/afm.2123.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety issues in post-discharge care of older patients in general practice: an ethnographic study.全科医疗中老年患者出院后护理的安全问题:一项人种志研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 May 29;75(755):e412-e422. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0284. Print 2025 Jun.
2
Understanding the scale and nature of avoidable healthcare-associated harm for prisoners in England: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study.了解英格兰囚犯可避免的医疗相关伤害的规模和性质:一项回顾性横断面研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e085607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085607.
3
Designing an Intervention to Improve Medication Safety for Nursing Home Residents Based on Experiential Knowledge Related to Patient Safety Culture at the Nursing Home Front Line: Cocreative Process Study.基于养老院一线患者安全文化相关经验知识设计改善养老院居民用药安全的干预措施:共创过程研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 9;8:e54977. doi: 10.2196/54977.
4
Analysis of applying a patient safety taxonomy to patient and clinician-reported incident reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study.应用患者安全分类法分析 COVID-19 大流行期间患者和临床医生报告的不良事件报告:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 14;23(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02057-6.
5
Defining avoidable healthcare-associated harm in prisons: A mixed-method development study.定义监狱中可避免的医疗保健相关伤害:一项混合方法发展研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282021. eCollection 2023.
6
Experience of Combined Procedure during Percutaneous LAA Closure.经皮左心耳封堵术中联合手术的经验
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3280. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123280.
7
Patients' perception of safety climate in Irish general practice: a cross-sectional study.爱尔兰普通实践中患者对安全氛围的感知:一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Dec 27;22(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01603-9.
8
Implementation of Computerized Physician Order Entry in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.基层医疗中计算机化医嘱录入的实施:一项范围综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Dec 17;14:3441-3451. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S344781. eCollection 2021.
9
Nature and type of patient-reported safety incidents in primary care: cross-sectional survey of patients from Australia and England.基层医疗中患者报告的安全事件的性质和类型:对澳大利亚和英国患者的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 29;11(4):e042551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042551.
10
A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Medication Safety Incidents Reported in Neonatal and Children's Intensive Care.混合方法分析新生儿和儿童重症监护中报告的药物安全事件。
Paediatr Drugs. 2021 May;23(3):287-297. doi: 10.1007/s40272-021-00442-6. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Safety Incidents Involving Sick Children in Primary Care in England and Wales: A Mixed Methods Analysis.英格兰和威尔士初级医疗中涉及患病儿童的患者安全事件:一项混合方法分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002217. eCollection 2017 Jan.
2
Too much medicine in older people? Deprescribing through shared decision making.老年人用药过量?通过共同决策减少用药。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 3;353:i2893. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2893.
3
How safe is primary care? A systematic review.初级保健有多安全?一项系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):544-53. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004178. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
4
A cross-sectional mixed methods study protocol to generate learning from patient safety incidents reported from general practice.一项横断面混合方法研究方案,旨在从全科医疗报告的患者安全事件中汲取经验教训。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 1;5(12):e009079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009079.
5
Routine failures in the process for blood testing and the communication of results to patients in primary care in the UK: a qualitative exploration of patient and provider perspectives.英国基层医疗中血液检测流程及向患者传达检测结果的常规失误:对患者和医护人员观点的定性探索
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):681-90. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003690. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of point-of-care tests (CoaguChek system, INRatio2 PT/INR monitor and ProTime Microcoagulation system) for the self-monitoring of the coagulation status of people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy, compared with standard UK practice: systematic review and economic evaluation.与英国标准做法相比,即时检验(CoaguChek系统、INRatio2 PT/INR监测仪和ProTime微量凝血系统)用于接受长期维生素K拮抗剂治疗患者凝血状态自我监测的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jun;19(48):1-172. doi: 10.3310/hta19480.
7
Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing.减少不适当的多种药物治疗:减药过程。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):827-34. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0324.
8
Patient-safety-related hospital deaths in England: thematic analysis of incidents reported to a national database, 2010-2012.英格兰与患者安全相关的医院死亡情况:对2010 - 2012年上报至国家数据库的事件进行的主题分析
PLoS Med. 2014 Jun 24;11(6):e1001667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001667. eCollection 2014 Jun.
9
Global research priorities to better understand the burden of iatrogenic harm in primary care: an international Delphi exercise.全球研究重点旨在更好地了解初级保健中医源性伤害的负担:一项国际德尔菲研究。
PLoS Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):e1001554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001554. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
10
The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review.英国普通实践中处方和监测错误的流行率和性质:回顾性病历审查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Aug;63(613):e543-53. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X670679.

老年人不安全初级保健的来源:对患者安全事件报告的混合方法分析。

Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports.

机构信息

Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham,UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):833-839. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx044.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afx044
PMID:28520904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5860504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

older adults are frequent users of primary healthcare services, but are at increased risk of healthcare-related harm in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

to describe the factors associated with actual or potential harm to patients aged 65 years and older, treated in primary care, to identify action to produce safer care.

DESIGN AND SETTING

a cross-sectional mixed-methods analysis of a national (England and Wales) database of patient safety incident reports from 2005 to 2013.

SUBJECTS

1,591 primary care patient safety incident reports regarding patients aged 65 years and older.

METHODS

we developed a classification system for the analysis of patient safety incident reports to describe: the incident and preceding chain of incidents; other contributory factors; and patient harm outcome. We combined findings from exploratory descriptive and thematic analyses to identify key sources of unsafe care.

RESULTS

the main sources of unsafe care in our weighted sample were due to: medication-related incidents e.g. prescribing, dispensing and administering (n = 486, 31%; 15% serious patient harm); communication-related incidents e.g. incomplete or non-transfer of information across care boundaries (n = 390, 25%; 12% serious patient harm); and clinical decision-making incidents which led to the most serious patient harm outcomes (n = 203, 13%; 41% serious patient harm).

CONCLUSION

priority areas for further research to determine the burden and preventability of unsafe primary care for older adults, include: the timely electronic tools for prescribing, dispensing and administering medication in the community; electronic transfer of information between healthcare settings; and, better clinical decision-making support and guidance.

摘要

背景

老年人是初级保健服务的高频使用者,但在这种环境下,他们面临着更高的医疗相关伤害风险。

目的

描述与在初级保健中接受治疗的 65 岁及以上老年患者实际或潜在伤害相关的因素,以确定采取何种措施来确保更安全的护理。

设计和设置

对 2005 年至 2013 年期间来自英格兰和威尔士国家(英格兰和威尔士)初级保健患者安全事件报告数据库的一项全国性(英格兰和威尔士)横断面混合方法分析。

研究对象

涉及 65 岁及以上老年患者的 1591 例初级保健患者安全事件报告。

方法

我们开发了一个患者安全事件报告分析分类系统,以描述:事件及先前事件链;其他促成因素;以及患者伤害结果。我们结合探索性描述性和主题分析的结果,确定不安全护理的主要来源。

结果

在我们加权样本中,不安全护理的主要来源是:与药物相关的事件,例如处方、配药和给药(n = 486,31%;15%严重患者伤害);与沟通相关的事件,例如在医疗保健边界之间信息不完整或未传递(n = 390,25%;12%严重患者伤害);以及导致最严重患者伤害结果的临床决策事件(n = 203,13%;41%严重患者伤害)。

结论

为进一步研究确定不安全的老年初级保健的负担和可预防性,确定优先研究领域包括:社区中用于处方、配药和给药的及时电子工具;医疗保健环境之间的信息电子传递;以及更好的临床决策支持和指导。