Suppr超能文献

门诊手术的药物干预:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案

Pharmacological intervention for ambulatory surgery: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Choi Geun Joo, Seong Hee-Kyeong, Kang Hyun

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21580. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021580.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aim to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to quantify and rank-order the efficacy and safety of analgesic medications for ambulatory surgery.

METHODS

We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of analgesics, beginning from their inception to February 2020. The primary endpoints will be pain score measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) or a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 3 different time points: Phase I recovery, phase II recovery, and recovery at home. Adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, arrhythmia, and respiratory depression, will be also assessed.We will conduct NMA and use surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values and rankograms to present the hierarchy of analgesic medication. A comparison-adjusted funnel plot will be used to assess the presence of small study effects. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the risk of bias tool 2.0. All statistical analyses will be performed using Stata SE version 15.0.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and NMA will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and NMA will provide comprehensive and convincing evidence regarding analgesic medication for pain after ambulatory surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018100000.

摘要

背景

我们旨在进行一项网络荟萃分析(NMA),以量化并排列门诊手术镇痛药物的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们将检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和谷歌学术数据库,以识别所有从开始至2020年2月的镇痛药随机对照试验(RCT)。主要终点将是在3个不同时间点使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)或数字评定量表(NRS)测量的疼痛评分:I期恢复、II期恢复和在家恢复时。还将评估不良事件,包括恶心、呕吐、头痛、头晕、心律失常和呼吸抑制。我们将进行NMA,并使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值和排序图来呈现镇痛药物的等级。将使用比较调整漏斗图来评估小研究效应的存在。将使用偏倚风险工具2.0评估纳入研究的质量。所有统计分析将使用Stata SE 15.0版进行。

结果

本系统评价和NMA的结果将发表在同行评审期刊上。

结论

本系统评价和NMA将为门诊手术后疼痛的镇痛药物提供全面且有说服力的证据。

试验注册号

CRD42018100000。

相似文献

8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Providing Value in Ambulatory Anesthesia in 2015.2015年门诊麻醉的价值体现
Anesthesiol Clin. 2015 Dec;33(4):731-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.07.011.
2
Providing value in ambulatory anesthesia.提供门诊麻醉的价值。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):617-22. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000255.
8
Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.STATA 中的网络荟萃分析图形工具。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 3;8(10):e76654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验