Liu Xiaoning, Jin Guang, Piao Chengdong, Zhong Zhuan, Chang Fei, Huang Bingzhe
Orthopaedic Medical Center, The 2nd Hospital of Jilin University.
Department of Orthopaedic, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21679. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021679.
Syndesmotic injuries account for a significant number of ankle injuries. There is no consensus regarding the recommended method of treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate: METHODS:: This study was performed and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. The records of 200 patients with ankle fractures who had undergone surgical treatment in our clinics between January 2014 and January 2018 were retrospectively investigated. This retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board in the 2nd Hospital of Jilin University. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale and the Foot Function Index. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale score, complications, range of movement of ankle, reoperations, and radiologic outcomes. For statistical comparison of the clinical and radiologic findings between the 2 groups, we used SPSS, version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL), statistical software. P Values of < .05 were considered statistically significant.
The hypothesis was that the SB technique would achieve better functional outcomes as compared to the syndesmotic screw technique after surgery.
This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5793).
下胫腓联合损伤占踝关节损伤的很大比例。关于推荐的治疗方法尚无共识。本研究的目的是评估:
本研究按照《加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范》清单进行实施和报告。回顾性调查了2014年1月至2018年1月期间在我们诊所接受手术治疗的200例踝关节骨折患者的记录。这项回顾性队列研究获得了吉林大学第二医院机构审查委员会的批准。主要结局指标是美国矫形足踝协会踝-后足评分和足部功能指数。次要结局指标包括视觉模拟量表评分、并发症、踝关节活动范围、再次手术以及影像学结局。为了对两组之间的临床和影像学结果进行统计学比较,我们使用了SPSS 21.0版(SPSS,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)统计软件。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
假设是与术后下胫腓联合螺钉技术相比,单束技术将获得更好的功能结局。
本研究方案已在研究注册库(researchregistry5793)注册。