• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of suture-button and screw fixation in the treatment of ankle syndesmotic injuries: Cohort study protocol.缝线纽扣与螺钉固定治疗踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的比较:队列研究方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21679. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021679.
2
Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years.随机对照试验比较缝合扣与单枚 3.5mm 踝关节联合螺钉治疗踝关节联合损伤:2 年随访结果相似。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):770-775. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1818175. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
3
Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries.下胫腓联合损伤中缝线纽扣与螺钉固定技术复位准确性的评估
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Dec;37(12):1317-1325. doi: 10.1177/1071100716661221. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
4
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.缝线纽扣与下胫腓螺钉治疗下胫腓联合损伤的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7.
5
Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device.采用新型无结缝线纽扣装置治疗急性下胫腓联合韧带断裂患者的并发症发生率更低,更快恢复运动。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):3156-3164. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4820-3. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
6
Chronic Syndesmotic Injury: Revision and Fixation With a Suture Button and a Quadricortical Screw.慢性下胫腓联合损伤:缝合纽扣和四皮质螺钉修复与固定。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2021 Aug;14(4):334-343. doi: 10.1177/1938640020916128. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
7
Better outcome for suture button compared with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.缝合纽扣固定比单一联合钉固定治疗踝关节联合损伤的效果更好:一项随机对照试验的五年结果。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):212-219. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0692.R2.
8
Technical aspects of the syndesmotic screw and their effect on functional outcome following acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.下胫腓联合螺钉的技术要点及其对急性下胫腓联合损伤后功能预后的影响。
Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):775-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
9
A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较TightRope和下胫腓联合螺钉固定在下胫腓联合复位准确性及维持方面的效果,采用双侧计算机断层扫描进行评估。
Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
10
Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution.下胫腓螺钉的转归——寻求合理的解决方案
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.062. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison the treatment of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament anatomical repair and syndesmosis screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries in ankle fracture.比较解剖修复前下胫腓联合韧带与联合钉固定治疗踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤。
BMC Surg. 2023 Apr 10;23(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01982-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Kinematic Analysis of Combined Suture-Button and Suture Anchor Augment Constructs for Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries.踝关节联合缝钉-纽扣和缝线锚钉增强结构的运动学分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Apr;41(4):463-472. doi: 10.1177/1071100719898181. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
2
Dynamic fixation is superior in terms of clinical outcomes to static fixation in managing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.在治疗下胫腓联合损伤时,动态固定在临床结果方面优于静态固定。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jan;28(1):270-280. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05659-0. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
3
Randomized Trial Comparing Suture Button with Single Syndesmotic Screw for Syndesmosis Injury.随机对照试验比较缝合纽扣与单一联合螺钉治疗踝关节联合损伤。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jan 3;100(1):2-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01011.
4
Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device.采用新型无结缝线纽扣装置治疗急性下胫腓联合韧带断裂患者的并发症发生率更低,更快恢复运动。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):3156-3164. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4820-3. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Current Ankle Syndesmosis Repair Techniques.三种当前踝关节下胫腓联合修复技术的生物力学比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Feb;38(2):200-207. doi: 10.1177/1071100716666278. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
6
A Comparison of Screw Fixation and Suture-Button Fixation in a Syndesmosis Injury in an Ankle Fracture.踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤中螺钉固定与缝线纽扣固定的比较
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;55(5):985-90. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
Comparison of screw fixation with elastic fixation methods in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries in ankle fractures.踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤治疗中螺钉固定与弹性固定方法的比较
Injury. 2015 Jul;46 Suppl 2:S19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.027. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
8
A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较TightRope和下胫腓联合螺钉固定在下胫腓联合复位准确性及维持方面的效果,采用双侧计算机断层扫描进行评估。
Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
9
Epidemiology of syndesmosis injuries in intercollegiate football: incidence and risk factors from National Collegiate Athletic Association injury surveillance system data from 2004-2005 to 2008-2009.大学生足球比赛中踝关节联合损伤的流行病学:2004-2005 至 2008-2009 年美国大学生体育协会损伤监测系统数据的发生率和危险因素。
Clin J Sport Med. 2013 Jul;23(4):278-82. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31827ee829.
10
Dynamic versus static external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: an up-to-date meta-analysis.动态与静态外固定治疗不稳定桡骨远端骨折:最新荟萃分析。
Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):1006-13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.11.018. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

缝线纽扣与螺钉固定治疗踝关节下胫腓联合损伤的比较:队列研究方案

Comparison of suture-button and screw fixation in the treatment of ankle syndesmotic injuries: Cohort study protocol.

作者信息

Liu Xiaoning, Jin Guang, Piao Chengdong, Zhong Zhuan, Chang Fei, Huang Bingzhe

机构信息

Orthopaedic Medical Center, The 2nd Hospital of Jilin University.

Department of Orthopaedic, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 7;99(32):e21679. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021679.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000021679
PMID:32769937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7592993/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Syndesmotic injuries account for a significant number of ankle injuries. There is no consensus regarding the recommended method of treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate: METHODS:: This study was performed and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. The records of 200 patients with ankle fractures who had undergone surgical treatment in our clinics between January 2014 and January 2018 were retrospectively investigated. This retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board in the 2nd Hospital of Jilin University. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale and the Foot Function Index. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale score, complications, range of movement of ankle, reoperations, and radiologic outcomes. For statistical comparison of the clinical and radiologic findings between the 2 groups, we used SPSS, version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL), statistical software. P Values of < .05 were considered statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The hypothesis was that the SB technique would achieve better functional outcomes as compared to the syndesmotic screw technique after surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5793).

摘要

背景

下胫腓联合损伤占踝关节损伤的很大比例。关于推荐的治疗方法尚无共识。本研究的目的是评估:

方法

本研究按照《加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范》清单进行实施和报告。回顾性调查了2014年1月至2018年1月期间在我们诊所接受手术治疗的200例踝关节骨折患者的记录。这项回顾性队列研究获得了吉林大学第二医院机构审查委员会的批准。主要结局指标是美国矫形足踝协会踝-后足评分和足部功能指数。次要结局指标包括视觉模拟量表评分、并发症、踝关节活动范围、再次手术以及影像学结局。为了对两组之间的临床和影像学结果进行统计学比较,我们使用了SPSS 21.0版(SPSS,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)统计软件。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结论

假设是与术后下胫腓联合螺钉技术相比,单束技术将获得更好的功能结局。

试验注册

本研究方案已在研究注册库(researchregistry5793)注册。