Moehl Keelin, Wright Rollin M, Shega Joseph, Malec Monica, Kelley Fitzgerald G, Robbins-Welty Gregg, Zoberi Kimberly, Tait Raymond, Perera Subashan, Deverts Denise, Horvath Zsuzsa, Weiner Debra K
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pain Med. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2117-2122. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa187.
Pain management in persons with mild to moderate dementia poses unique challenges because of altered pain modulation and the tendency of some individuals to perseverate. We aimed to test the impact of an e-learning module about pain in communicative people with dementia on third-year medical students who had or had not completed an experiential geriatrics course.
Analysis of pre- to postlearning changes and comparison of the same across the student group.
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Saint Louis University School of Medicine.
One hundred four University of Pittsburgh and 57 Saint Louis University medical students.
University of Pittsburgh students were randomized to view either the pain and dementia module or a control module on pain during a five-day geriatrics course. Saint Louis University students were asked to complete either of the two modules without the context of a geriatrics course. A 10-item multiple choice knowledge test and three-item attitudes and confidence questionnaires were administered before viewing the module and up to seven days later.
Knowledge increase was significantly greater among students who viewed the dementia module while participating in the geriatrics course than among students who viewed the module without engaging in the course (P < 0.001). The modules did not improve attitudes in any group, while student confidence improved in all groups.
Medical students exposed to e-learning or experiential learning demonstrated improved confidence in evaluating and managing pain in patients with dementia. Those exposed to both educational methods also significantly improved their knowledge.
由于疼痛调节改变以及一些个体存在持续重复行为的倾向,对轻度至中度痴呆患者进行疼痛管理面临着独特的挑战。我们旨在测试一个关于痴呆症患者疼痛的电子学习模块对已完成或未完成老年医学体验课程的三年级医学生的影响。
分析学习前后的变化,并对学生群体中的变化进行比较。
匹兹堡大学医学院和圣路易斯大学医学院。
104名匹兹堡大学和57名圣路易斯大学的医学生。
匹兹堡大学的学生在为期五天的老年医学课程中被随机分配观看疼痛与痴呆模块或疼痛控制模块。圣路易斯大学的学生被要求在没有老年医学课程背景的情况下完成两个模块中的任意一个。在观看模块前以及观看后长达七天的时间里,进行一次包含10道选择题的知识测试以及一份包含三道题的态度和信心问卷。
在参加老年医学课程时观看痴呆模块的学生,其知识增长显著高于未参加课程而观看该模块的学生(P < 0.001)。这些模块在任何一组中都没有改善态度,而所有组的学生信心都有所提高。
接触电子学习或体验式学习的医学生在评估和管理痴呆患者疼痛方面表现出更高的信心。同时接触这两种教育方法的学生在知识方面也有显著提高。