Yalici-Armagan Basak, Elcin Gonca
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14132. doi: 10.1111/dth.14132. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newer microfocused ultrasound (MFU) device on the lower face laxity. Subjects who underwent MFU therapy for skin tightening were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome measure was overall improvement in skin laxity of the lower face that was evaluated by improvement on jawline irregularities, marionette line, and submental laxity. Assessments were obtained from two blinded dermatologists paired pre- and post-treatment photographs with Investigator-Global-Aesthetic-Improvement-Scale (IGAIS) and from subjects with Subject-GAIS (SGAIS). A total of 24 subjects were evaluated on a median of 4.3 months after 1 session MFU application. According to IGAIS, 5 subjects (20.9%) demonstrated improvement and 15 subjects (62.5%) had no change. Four subjects (16.7%) were scored as worsening. According to SGAIS, 11 subjects (45.9%) reported an improvement whereas 9 subjects (37.5%) reported no change. There was a statistically significant difference between the improvement rate assessed by the investigators and the subjects, where investigators scored lower (P = .006). No serious adverse effects were observed. The relatively high improvement rate observed by the subjects' self assessments compared to investigators evaluation from the photographs suggested that we need to find new evaluation methods other than photography which may reflect what subjects feel but we cannot see.
评估一种新型微聚焦超声(MFU)设备对面部下半部分皮肤松弛的疗效和安全性。纳入接受MFU治疗以紧致皮肤的受试者进行研究。主要结局指标是通过下颌轮廓不规则度、木偶纹和颏下皮肤松弛度的改善情况来评估面部下半部分皮肤松弛的总体改善情况。评估由两名不知情的皮肤科医生根据治疗前后配对的照片,采用研究者整体美学改善量表(IGAIS)进行,同时也收集受试者的自我整体美学改善量表(SGAIS)评分。共对24名受试者在单次MFU治疗后中位4.3个月时进行了评估。根据IGAIS,5名受试者(20.9%)有改善,15名受试者(62.5%)无变化。4名受试者(16.7%)评分变差。根据SGAIS,11名受试者(45.9%)报告有改善,而9名受试者(37.5%)报告无变化。研究者评估的改善率与受试者评估的改善率之间存在统计学显著差异,研究者的评分更低(P = 0.006)。未观察到严重不良反应。与研究者根据照片进行的评估相比,受试者自我评估观察到的较高改善率表明,我们需要找到除摄影之外的新评估方法,这些方法可能反映受试者的感受而我们无法从照片中看到。