• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管二尖瓣修复术治疗慢性肝病患者:来自全国住院患者样本的研究结果。

Transcatheter mitral valve repair in patients with chronic liver disease: Insights from the national inpatient sample.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

Guthrie Clinic/Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 1;97(2):344-352. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29173. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.29173
PMID:32770731
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate contemporary national trends of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) and co-existing chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR).

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to assess trends in patients undergoing TMVR between January 2012 and December 2017. Propensity match analysis was done to compare it to subjects without underlying CLD. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of 15,270 patients undergoing TMVR, 569 (3.7%) had coexisting CLD. Patients with CLD had a higher proportion of males (61.3 vs 52.6%; p < .01), congestive heart failure (6.9 vs 1.0%; p < .01), renal failure (42.2 vs 36.7%; p < .01), and peripheral vascular disease (19.3 vs 12.5%; p < .01). After propensity matching subjects with CLD had significantly higher hospital mortality (19.8 vs 4.6%; p < .01), acute kidney injury (46.1 vs 37.8%; p < .01), cardiogenic shock (25.4 vs 12.1%; p < .01), mechanical ventilation (26.3 vs 14.0; p < .01), pneumothorax (6.6 vs <2%.; p < .01), length of stay (5 vs 9 days), and average cost of hospitalization (209,573 vs 250,587 $; p < .01). Over the years, in-hospital mortality in patients receiving TMVR has improved in both patients with (from 33.3 in 2013 to 22.2% in 2017) and without CLD (from 2.7 in 2011 to 1.6% in 2017).

CONCLUSION

Patients with MR undergoing TMVR, with coexisting CLD bear substantially higher comorbidities, complication rates, and inpatient mortality compared with those without CLD. A favorable temporal trend of in-hospital mortality among these subjects is noteworthy.

摘要

目的

评估经导管二尖瓣修复术(TMVR)治疗合并慢性肝病(CLD)的二尖瓣反流(MR)患者的发病率、死亡率和医疗保健利用的当代全国趋势。

方法

使用国家住院患者样本(NIS)评估 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月间接受 TMVR 的患者的趋势。进行倾向匹配分析以将其与无潜在 CLD 的患者进行比较。使用 logistic 回归分析确定住院死亡率的预测因素。

结果

在 15270 例接受 TMVR 的患者中,569 例(3.7%)合并 CLD。CLD 患者中男性比例更高(61.3%比 52.6%;p<.01),充血性心力衰竭(6.9%比 1.0%;p<.01),肾衰竭(42.2%比 36.7%;p<.01)和外周血管疾病(19.3%比 12.5%;p<.01)。在倾向匹配后,CLD 患者的住院死亡率显著更高(19.8%比 4.6%;p<.01),急性肾损伤(46.1%比 37.8%;p<.01),心源性休克(25.4%比 12.1%;p<.01),机械通气(26.3%比 14.0%;p<.01),气胸(6.6%比 <2%;p<.01),住院时间(5 比 9 天)和住院费用(209573 比 250587 美元;p<.01)。近年来,接受 TMVR 的患者的住院死亡率在合并 CLD 的患者中(从 2013 年的 33.3%到 2017 年的 22.2%)和无 CLD 的患者中(从 2011 年的 2.7%到 2017 年的 1.6%)均有所改善。

结论

与无 CLD 的患者相比,接受 TMVR 治疗的 MR 合并 CLD 的患者的合并症、并发症发生率和住院死亡率明显更高。值得注意的是,这些患者的住院死亡率呈有利的时间趋势。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter mitral valve repair in patients with chronic liver disease: Insights from the national inpatient sample.经导管二尖瓣修复术治疗慢性肝病患者:来自全国住院患者样本的研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 1;97(2):344-352. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29173. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
2
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair with Mitraclip in patients with pulmonary hypertension: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.在全国住院患者样本中观察到肺动脉高压患者经导管二尖瓣修复术(Mitraclip)的住院治疗结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):E30-E36. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27997. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
3
Impact of age and comorbidities on the effect of transcatheter versus surgical mitral valve repair on inpatient outcomes.年龄和合并症对经导管与外科二尖瓣修复术治疗住院结局影响的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):1195-1201. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28479. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
4
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair in patients with and without end stage renal disease: A national propensity match study.经导管二尖瓣修复术治疗终末期肾病患者与非终末期肾病患者的院内转归:一项全国倾向匹配研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 1;98(2):343-351. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29517. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients with Mitral insufficiency.二尖瓣反流患者经导管二尖瓣修复术与经导管二尖瓣置换术的比较
Arch Med Res. 2023 Feb;54(2):145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2022.12.009. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
Thirty-day readmissions after transcatheter versus surgical mitral valve repair in high-risk patients with mitral regurgitation: Analysis of the 2014-2015 Nationwide readmissions databases.经导管与外科二尖瓣修复术治疗高危二尖瓣反流患者后的30天再入院情况:对2014 - 2015年全国再入院数据库的分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 1;96(3):664-674. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28647. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
7
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Medical Therapy for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.经导管二尖瓣置换术与药物治疗继发性二尖瓣反流:倾向评分匹配比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jun;16(6):e013045. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013045. Epub 2023 May 16.
8
In-hospital outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with chronic kidney disease: An analysis from the 2010-2016 National inpatient sample.经导管缘对缘二尖瓣修复术治疗慢性肾脏病患者的院内转归:2010-2016 年全国住院患者样本分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):1177-1184. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29712. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with normal left atrial pressure undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair.经导管二尖瓣修复术治疗左心房压正常患者的特征和结局。
Heart. 2020 Jun;106(12):898-903. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316133. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Cardiogenic Shock and Mitral Regurgitation: A Patient-Level, Multicenter Analysis.心源性休克合并二尖瓣反流的经导管二尖瓣修复术:一项患者水平的多中心分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 11;14(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.037. Epub 2020 Oct 14.