Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløwsvej 9, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Aug 8;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01227-5.
Deprescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can be considered in situations where the drug may no longer be necessary; however, this requires a careful discussion between patients and healthcare providers, often general practitioners (GPs). The aim of our study was to explore how GPs discuss PPI deprescribing with patients and compare that to how older patients would like to discuss this decision.
We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with GPs (n = 11) and patients aged ≥65 years who were taking PPIs (n = 4). Analysis of interviews was based on systematic text condensation.
We identified four main themes: (1) Reasons PPI deprescribing comes up, (2) Considering PPI deprescribing, (3) Discussion topics, and (4) Incorporating patient preferences into PPI deprescribing decisions. We found that PPI deprescribing often comes up during consultations for other problems or due to concern about medication burden in general. GPs discussed topics related to symptom control, such as the possibility of rebound symptoms, the need to taper PPIs, and what to do if symptoms returned. This aligned with what patients felt was important to discuss. Some GPs routinely incorporated patient preferences into decisions, whereas others did not.
When discussing PPI deprescribing, the GPs in our study generally focused on topics related to symptom control. There was variability in how and if patient preferences were discussed. Greater focus may be needed on developing mechanisms to elicit and incorporate patient preferences into PPI deprescribing decisions. Future research could also explore more systematic approaches to reassess ongoing PPI use in an effort to curb unnecessary long-term use of PPIs.
质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 的减用可以考虑在药物可能不再必要的情况下;然而,这需要患者和医疗保健提供者之间进行仔细的讨论,通常是全科医生 (GP)。我们研究的目的是探讨全科医生如何与患者讨论 PPI 的减用,并将其与老年患者希望如何讨论这一决定进行比较。
我们使用半结构式访谈对全科医生 (n=11) 和正在服用 PPI 的年龄≥65 岁的患者 (n=4) 进行了定性研究。访谈分析基于系统文本压缩。
我们确定了四个主要主题:(1) PPI 减用的原因,(2) 考虑 PPI 减用,(3) 讨论的话题,和 (4) 将患者偏好纳入 PPI 减用决策。我们发现,PPI 的减用通常是在为其他问题就诊时或由于对一般药物负担的担忧而提出的。全科医生讨论了与症状控制相关的话题,例如反弹症状的可能性、逐渐减少 PPI 的必要性以及如果症状再次出现该怎么办。这与患者认为重要的讨论内容一致。一些全科医生通常会将患者的偏好纳入决策中,而另一些则不会。
在讨论 PPI 的减用时,我们研究中的全科医生通常关注与症状控制相关的话题。讨论患者偏好的方式和是否讨论存在差异。可能需要更加关注开发机制,以引出并将患者偏好纳入 PPI 减用决策中。未来的研究还可以探索更系统的方法来重新评估正在进行的 PPI 使用情况,以努力遏制不必要的长期使用 PPI。