Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 1;10(8):523-527. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.143.
Building on Rinaldi and Bekker's scoping review of articles on the impact of populist radical right (PRR) politics on welfare and population health, this short article formulates three pointers towards a framework that might help structure future research into PRR, populist politics more generally, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other health issues. First, we discuss the centrality of welfare chauvinism to the PRR's impact on health, taking this as a cue for a broader reflection on the importance on distinguishing between the nativist and populist dimensions of PRR politics. Secondly, we turn our attention to the potential moderating effect of the PRR's welfare chauvinism on the welfare cuts proposed by their right-wing coalition partners, comments we see as pointing to the need to focus on nativist, populist, neoliberal and other threats to welfare policy more generally, rather than on the PRR only. Thirdly, we reflect on the paradoxical nature of welfare chauvinism - its negative consequences for the health of the 'own people' it proclaims to defend - as a starting point for a brief discussion of the need to consider carefully the not-so-straightforward relation between the PRR's political rhetoric, its (impact on) policy and institutions, and the outcomes of such policy.
基于里纳尔迪和贝克对民粹主义激进右翼(PRR)政治对福利和人口健康影响的综述文章,本文提出了三个要点,旨在构建一个框架,有助于对 PRR、民粹主义政治以及 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和其他健康问题进行未来研究。首先,我们讨论了福利沙文主义在 PRR 对健康影响中的核心地位,以此为线索,更广泛地反思区分 PRR 政治的本土主义和民粹主义维度的重要性。其次,我们将注意力转向 PRR 的福利沙文主义对其右翼联盟伙伴提出的福利削减的潜在调节作用,我们认为这表明需要更加关注本土主义、民粹主义、新自由主义和其他对福利政策的威胁,而不仅仅是 PRR。第三,我们反思了福利沙文主义的矛盾性质——它对其宣称要捍卫的“本国人”的健康造成的负面影响——作为一个起点,简要讨论了需要仔细考虑 PRR 的政治言论、其(对)政策和机构的影响以及这种政策的结果之间并非如此直接的关系的必要性。