Departement of Political Science, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):591-593. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.157.
Rinaldi and Bekker ask whether populist radical right (PRR) parties have an influence on population health and health equity. The assumption is that this influence is negative, but mediated by political system characteristics. Starting from the authors' premise that the positions of PRR parties on welfare policies are a good proxy for health outcomes, we build on political science literature to suggest further avenues for research. The equivocal relationship between political parties and the ownership of specific healthcare, health insurance and public health issues invites studies that break down party positions relating to different health policy issues. As policy-makers use social representations of target populations to make policy decisions and anticipate the feedback these decisions might generate, it is worth studying how PRR parties influence societal, institutional and partisan perceptions of deserving and undeserving populations, even when they are not in government.
里纳尔迪和贝克问民粹主义激进右翼(PRR)政党是否对人口健康和健康公平产生影响。他们的假设是这种影响是负面的,但受到政治制度特征的调节。从作者的前提出发,即 PRR 政党在福利政策上的立场是健康结果的一个很好的代表,我们借鉴政治学文献,提出了进一步研究的途径。政党与特定医疗保健、医疗保险和公共卫生问题的所有权之间的不确定关系,邀请人们进行研究,将政党立场分解为与不同卫生政策问题相关的立场。由于政策制定者利用目标人群的社会代表性来做出政策决策,并预测这些决策可能产生的反馈,因此值得研究 PRR 政党如何影响社会、制度和党派对值得和不值得的人群的看法,即使它们不在政府中。