Oxford Vaccine Group and Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Glob Public Health. 2021 Mar;16(3):340-353. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1805786. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
Travel restrictions have become a common disease control measure during the 2019 Coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19). Measures have ranged from quarantines when entering a country to outright travel bans. Yet more widespread travel restrictions in the form of country vaccine entry requirements have been in place for a long time for another disease - yellow fever. We track the historical underpinnings and policy developments that have led to stringent vaccine entry requirements today. We also discuss the political issues raised by health measures imposed on borders and discuss the reasons behind some clear regional differences. Almost no European countries currently have vaccine entry requirements, while at the other end of the spectrum, the majority of countries in the African region do, making vaccine entry requirements a global south phenomenon. We argue that vaccine entry requirements should be reassessed in the future as an underused public health tool, likely to become increasingly common. Vaccine entry requirements have proved effective in controlling the international spread of yellow fever but more can be done to ensure better use of this measure. Caution is needed due to the close links between public health and politics, evident since the first travel restriction in quarantines.
旅行限制已成为 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的常见疾病控制措施。这些措施范围从进入一个国家时的隔离到全面旅行禁令。然而,由于另一种疾病——黄热病,以国家疫苗入境要求的形式实施了更广泛的旅行限制已经有很长时间了。我们追踪了导致今天严格疫苗入境要求的历史背景和政策发展。我们还讨论了对边境实施卫生措施所引发的政治问题,并探讨了一些明显的区域差异背后的原因。目前几乎没有欧洲国家有疫苗入境要求,而在另一端,非洲地区的大多数国家都有疫苗入境要求,这使得疫苗入境要求成为一种全球南方现象。我们认为,疫苗入境要求作为一种未充分利用的公共卫生工具,今后应重新评估,可能会越来越普遍。疫苗入境要求已被证明能有效控制黄热病的国际传播,但在确保更好地利用这一措施方面还有更多工作要做。由于公共卫生和政治之间的密切联系,自第一次旅行限制(隔离)以来,这种联系就已经很明显,因此需要谨慎行事。