Srnec R, PĚnČÍk J, StaŇkovÁ L, NeČasovÁ A, Krbec M, NeČas A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(3):210-214.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Tendon injuries continue to be a highly topical issue. Research and clinical activities in this area aim to achieve an optimal repair of the damaged tendon. Such suture is characterised by maximum tensile strength, resistance to gapping at the repair site, preservation of smooth surface, prevention of adhesions and facilitation of fast rehabilitation and active tendon movement. The suture as such is required to show mechanical resistance in particular. Considered optimal is the use of core suture of the tendon in combination with epitendinous suture. The group of researchers has for several years already been exploring new materials. They can contribute to better balance between adequate mechanical strength of the suture and biological support of healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was carried out as an ex vivo experiment on porcine tendon models. A tendon segment was obtained from slaughtered animals and a total rupture of the tendon was imitated by sharp cutting of its central portion. Subsequently, the tendon was repaired by Adelaide suture using coated braided polyester (Ethibond) and two types of new polyamide 6 based (PA6) sutures. The first suture was designed as an unabsorbable polyester core (PES silk) surrounded by absorbable PA6 nanofibres. The second suture was created by braiding a PES silk yarn and two viscose yarns with PA6 nanofibres into a composite surgical suture. As a part of the study also examined was the tensile strength of suture with the use of other stitches, effect of the shape of the needle s point on the tensile strength of the suture and the effect of secured mattress peritendinous suture. The tensile strength of the suture was tested until failure and the achieved maximum load was monitored. RESULTS The PES core yarn with PA6 nanofibre braiding showed lower tensile strength (28.5 ± 5.2 N) than the yarn braided from one PES yarn and two viscose yarns with PA6 nanofibres (45.7 ± 6.7 N). Both newly developed sutures, however, fail to achieve the tensile strength of Ethibond (100.3 ± 19.1 N). In case of Ethibond suture using various types of stitches, the lowest tensile strength was observed in McLarney 4-strand core suture (68.8 ± 18.7 N). A higher tensile strength was achieved by Adelaide 4-strand core suture (83.6 ± 11.2 N). The highest tensile strength was seen in 6-strand core Savage suture (147.4 ± 22.7 N). When the effect of the type of needle was tested, a statistically significant difference between the taper point needle (72.0 ± 7.0 N) and reverse cutting needle (63.3 ± 9.6 N) was observed. In case of McLarney suture the epitendinous stitch increased the tensile strength by 46.2% and in case of Adelaide suture by 48.3%. CONCLUSIONS For tendon core suture, the use of sutures with multiple longitudinal segments seems more appropriate. The epitendinous suture can considerably reinforce the basic load-bearing core suture. Also observed was not an insignificant effect of the needle profile on the resulting tensile strength of the suture. In materials developed by us, more suitable seems to be the design of braiding of absorbable nanofibers with a load-bearing non-absorbable yarn. While the mechanical tensile strength of new materials is lower, the benefits are expected in the form of biological support of healing. Moreover, the nanofibers can be used as a carrier of biological and therapeutic substances. Further improvement of mechanical properties of the newly developed biomaterial can be foreseen if the material of the load-bearing non-absorbable yarn is changed or the load-bearing yarn and nanofibres ratio modified. This pilot study shall use the findings for further development and modification of new materials in basic research and shall also verify the biological aspects and the course of healing in in vivo studies. Key words: tendon, suture, pig, biomaterials, nanofibres, mechanical testing, healing, polyester, Adelaide.
研究目的 肌腱损伤仍然是一个备受关注的热门问题。该领域的研究和临床活动旨在实现受损肌腱的最佳修复。这种缝合的特点是具有最大的拉伸强度、在修复部位抗缝隙形成、保持光滑表面、防止粘连并促进快速康复和肌腱的主动运动。这种缝合尤其需要具备机械抗性。肌腱的核心缝合与腱周缝合相结合被认为是最佳的。该研究团队多年来一直在探索新材料。它们有助于在缝合线足够的机械强度和愈合的生物支持之间实现更好的平衡。 材料与方法 本研究作为对猪肌腱模型的体外实验进行。从屠宰动物获取一段肌腱,通过锐性切割其中心部分模拟肌腱的完全断裂。随后,使用涂覆编织聚酯(Ethibond)和两种新型聚酰胺6基(PA6)缝合线通过阿德莱德缝合法修复肌腱。第一种缝合线设计为不可吸收的聚酯芯(PES丝)被可吸收的PA6纳米纤维包围。第二种缝合线是通过将一根PES丝线和两根粘胶线与PA6纳米纤维编织成复合手术缝合线制成。作为研究的一部分,还检查了使用其他缝合方式时缝合线的拉伸强度、针尖形状对缝合线拉伸强度的影响以及固定褥式腱周缝合的效果。测试缝合线的拉伸强度直至失效,并监测达到的最大负荷。 结果 带有PA6纳米纤维编织的PES芯线的拉伸强度(28.5±5.2 N)低于由一根PES线和两根与PA6纳米纤维的粘胶线编织而成的线(45.7±6.7 N)。然而,两种新开发的缝合线均未达到Ethibond的拉伸强度(100.3±19.1 N)。对于使用各种类型缝合方式的Ethibond缝合线,在麦克拉尼4股芯线缝合中观察到最低的拉伸强度(68.8±18.7 N)。阿德莱德4股芯线缝合获得了更高的拉伸强度(83.6±11.2 N)。在6股芯线萨维奇缝合中观察到最高的拉伸强度(147.4±22.7 N)。当测试针的类型的影响时,观察到锥形针尖针(72.0±7.0 N)和反切针(63.3±9.6 N)之间存在统计学上的显著差异。在麦克拉尼缝合中,腱周缝合使拉伸强度提高了46.2%,在阿德莱德缝合中提高了48.3%。 结论 对于肌腱核心缝合,使用具有多个纵向段的缝合线似乎更合适。腱周缝合可以显著增强基本的承重核心缝合。还观察到针的外形对缝合线最终拉伸强度有不可忽视的影响。在我们开发的材料中,可吸收纳米纤维与承重不可吸收纱线的编织设计似乎更合适。虽然新材料的机械拉伸强度较低,但预计在愈合的生物支持方面会有好处。此外,纳米纤维可作为生物和治疗物质的载体。如果改变承重不可吸收纱线的材料或调整承重纱线与纳米纤维的比例,可以预见新开发的生物材料的机械性能会进一步提高。这项初步研究应将这些发现用于基础研究中新材料的进一步开发和改进,并且还应在体内研究中验证生物学方面和愈合过程。关键词:肌腱;缝合线;猪;生物材料;纳米纤维;力学测试;愈合;聚酯;阿德莱德