• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮血管内成形术和支架置入术后颈动脉狭窄患者再狭窄的长期影像学随访。

Long-term imaging follow-up to evaluate restenosis in patients with carotid stenosis after angioplasty and stenting.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;84(1):87-94. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000405.

DOI:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000405
PMID:32773586
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stent patency after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) correlates not only with stroke prevention but also with improvements in cognition and quality of life by positively influencing cerebral perfusion. The long-term outcomes of CAS after more than 5 years have still not been well described. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the stent patency and significant restenosis (SR) after CAS with more than 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2012, 118 patients with carotid stenosis who underwent 131 CAS procedures with regular annual imaging follow-up for more than 5 years were enrolled. We evaluated their demographic characteristics and the risk factors related to stent restenosis. Patients with SR (restenosis ≥ 50%) were compared with those with no significant restenosis (NSR, patency or restenosis < 50%) to identify the restenosis predictors and restenosis-free survival.

RESULTS

Of the 131 CAS procedures, 16.0% (21/131) had SR. A history of head and neck radiotherapy (HNRT) was a predictor for SR (HR, 6.352; 95% CI, 2.504-16.112; p < 0.001) and was associated with shorter restenosis-free survival (log-rank test p value < 0.001, median time of restenosis-free survival was 38 months). Left-sided stenting was an associated factor for SR (HR, 3.007; 95% CI, 1.068-8.467; p = 0.037) with a trend of less restenosis-free survival (log-rank test p value 0.067).

CONCLUSION

Both HNRT and left-sided carotid stenosis were predictors of SR after CAS in more than 5 years of long-term follow-up. Restenosis-free survival was significantly shorter in patients with prior HNRT than in patients without previous irradiation treatment. We suggest close follow-up and aggressive medical treatment for patients with prior HNRT and left-sided carotid stenosis undergoing CAS.

摘要

背景

颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)后的支架通畅率不仅与预防中风有关,而且通过积极影响脑灌注还可改善认知功能和生活质量。然而,超过 5 年的 CAS 长期结果仍未得到很好的描述。本回顾性研究旨在评估超过 5 年随访期的 CAS 后的支架通畅率和显著再狭窄(SR)。

方法

在 2006 年至 2012 年间,我们招募了 118 名颈动脉狭窄患者,他们接受了 131 例 CAS 手术,并进行了超过 5 年的定期年度影像学随访。我们评估了他们的人口统计学特征和与支架再狭窄相关的危险因素。将 SR(再狭窄≥50%)患者与无显著再狭窄(NSR,通畅或再狭窄<50%)患者进行比较,以确定再狭窄的预测因素和无再狭窄生存率。

结果

在 131 例 CAS 手术中,有 16.0%(21/131)发生了 SR。头颈部放疗(HNRT)史是 SR 的预测因素(HR,6.352;95%CI,2.504-16.112;p<0.001),并与较短的无再狭窄生存率相关(log-rank 检验 p 值<0.001,无再狭窄生存率的中位时间为 38 个月)。左侧支架置入是 SR 的相关因素(HR,3.007;95%CI,1.068-8.467;p=0.037),且无再狭窄生存率呈下降趋势(log-rank 检验 p 值 0.067)。

结论

在超过 5 年的长期随访中,HNRT 和左侧颈动脉狭窄均是 CAS 后 SR 的预测因素。与未接受过放疗的患者相比,有 HNRT 史的患者无再狭窄生存率显著缩短。对于接受过 HNRT 和左侧颈动脉狭窄的 CAS 患者,我们建议密切随访并积极进行药物治疗。

相似文献

1
Long-term imaging follow-up to evaluate restenosis in patients with carotid stenosis after angioplasty and stenting.经皮血管内成形术和支架置入术后颈动脉狭窄患者再狭窄的长期影像学随访。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;84(1):87-94. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000405.
2
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
3
Predictors of midterm high-grade restenosis after carotid revascularization in a multicenter national database.多中心国家数据库中颈动脉血运重建术后中期高级别再狭窄的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jun;71(6):1972-1981. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.100. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Risk factors for restenosis after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后再狭窄的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Nov;44(5):1010-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.07.039.
5
Carotid angioplasty and stenting in anatomically high-risk patients: Safe and durable except for radiation-induced stenosis.解剖学高危患者的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术:除放射性狭窄外安全且持久。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4):762-7; discussion 767-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.066.
6
Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions.既往颈动脉内膜切除术与新发病变后颈动脉支架置入术的长期比较结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1526602815581597. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
Safety and efficacy of carotid angioplasty/stenting in 100 consecutive high surgical risk patients: immediate and long-term follow-up.100例连续高手术风险患者行颈动脉血管成形术/支架置入术的安全性和有效性:即刻及长期随访
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 Oct-Nov;42(5):433-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574408318477. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
8
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
9
In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty-stenting: incidence and management.颈动脉血管成形术-支架置入术后支架内再狭窄:发生率及处理
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Feb;33(2):220-5; discussion 225-6. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.111880.
10
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.支架置入后颈动脉的双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Utility of PLR and Platelet-to-LDL Ratio for in-Stent Restenosis Following Carotid Artery Stenting.PLR和血小板与低密度脂蛋白比值对颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的预测效用
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025 Aug 27;21:671-684. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S534400. eCollection 2025.
2
Carotid Artery Stenting Intervention to Enhance Global Brain Blood Flow and Cognition in Carotid Artery Disease: Preliminary Findings from a Prospective Follow-Up MRI Study.颈动脉支架置入干预改善颈动脉疾病患者的全脑血流和认知功能:一项前瞻性随访MRI研究的初步结果
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 5;61(5):848. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050848.
3
Treatment of In-stent Restenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery Using Drug-eluting Balloons.
药物涂层球囊治疗颈内动脉支架内再狭窄。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Mar;34(1):147-154. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01343-6. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
Prevention of in-stent restenosis with drug-eluting balloons in patients with postirradiated carotid stenosis accepting percutaneous angioplasty and stenting.药物涂层球囊预防接受经皮血管成形术和支架置入术的放射性颈动脉狭窄患者的支架内再狭窄。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Dec 19;16(1):73-80. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019957.