Suppr超能文献

药物治疗为基础的学习课程中临床文档评分标准的评定者间信度。

Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Documentation Rubric Within Pharmacotherapy Problem-Based Learning Courses.

机构信息

University of Kansas, School of Pharmacy, Lawrence, Kansas.

Purdue University, College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, Indiana.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7648. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7648.

Abstract

To evaluate a clinical documentation rubric for pharmacotherapy problem-based learning (PBL) courses using inter-rater reliability (IRR) among different evaluators. A rubric was adapted for use in grading student pharmacists' clinical documentation in pharmacotherapy PBL courses. Multiple faculty evaluators used the rubric to assess student pharmacists' clinical documentation. The mean rubric score given by the evaluators and the standard deviation were calculated. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the rubric. Three hundred seventeen clinical documentation submissions were scored twice by multiple evaluators using the rubric. The mean initial evaluation score was 9.1 (SD=0.9) and the mean second evaluation score was 9.1 (SD=0.9), with no significant difference found between the two. The overall ICC was 0.7 across multiple graders, indicating good IRR. The clinical documentation rubric demonstrated overall good IRR between multiple evaluators when used in pharmacotherapy PBL courses. The rubric will undergo additional evaluation and continuous quality improvement to ensure that student pharmacists are provided with the formative feedback they need.

摘要

评估临床文档药物治疗基于问题学习(PBL)课程的评分标准,以不同评估者之间的评分者间信度(IRR)为指标。我们对评分标准进行了调整,以用于评估药剂学生在药物治疗 PBL 课程中的临床文档。多位教师评估者使用该评分标准来评估药剂学生的临床文档。计算了评估者给出的平均评分标准分数和标准差。计算了组内相关系数(ICC),以确定评分标准的评分者间信度(IRR)。使用评分标准对 317 份临床文档提交进行了两次评分,由多位评估者完成。初始评估得分的平均值为 9.1(SD=0.9),第二次评估得分的平均值为 9.1(SD=0.9),两者之间无显著差异。多位评分者的总体 ICC 为 0.7,表明 IRR 良好。在药物治疗 PBL 课程中使用该评分标准时,多个评估者之间的临床文档评分标准总体上具有良好的 IRR。该评分标准将进行进一步评估和持续质量改进,以确保为药剂学生提供他们所需的形成性反馈。

相似文献

2
Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Nov;82(9):6725. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6725.
3
Evaluation of a Rubric to Assess Pharmacy Student Performance in a Telehealth Simulation Exercise.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Nov;86(8):ajpe8778. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8778. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Inter-Rater Reliability of Web-Based Calibrated Peer Review within a Pharmacy Curriculum.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Apr;84(4):7583. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7583.
5
Inter-rater reliability of a reflective rubric to assess pharmacy students' reflective thinking.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):989-995. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
6
Inter-rater reliability and generalizability of patient note scores using a scoring rubric based on the USMLE Step-2 CS format.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Oct;21(4):761-73. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9664-3. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Striving for interrater reliability with a patient counseling assessment rubric: Lessons learned.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Jun;12(6):603-613. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
A rubric to assess critical literature evaluation skills.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):63. doi: 10.5688/aj710463.
10
Developing Validity Evidence for the Written Pediatric History and Physical Exam Evaluation Rubric.
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Jan-Feb;17(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

2
Building a Hospital Pharmacist Workforce by a Diversified and Position-Oriented Learning System.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jun 24;17:2989-2997. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S467540. eCollection 2024.
4
Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Apr 23;9(2):91. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9020091.

本文引用的文献

2
Assessment of pharmacy students' patient care skills using case scenarios with a SOAP note grading rubric and standardized patient feedback.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 May;11(5):513-521. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 May 3.
3
Systems Thinking for Transitions of Care: Reliability Testing for a Standardized Rubric.
Clin Nurse Spec. 2019 May/Jun;33(3):128-135. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000443.
4
Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Nov;82(9):6725. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6725.
5
Assessment of SOAP note evaluation tools in colleges and schools of pharmacy.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):576-584. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
6
Comparison of electronic versus paper rubrics to assess patient counseling experiences in a skills-based lab course.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):1117-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
7
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
A standardized patient counseling rubric for a pharmaceutical care and communications course.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Sep 12;77(7):152. doi: 10.5688/ajpe777152.
9
Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial.
Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.
10
A standardized rubric to evaluate student presentations.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Nov 10;74(9):171. doi: 10.5688/aj7409171.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验