University of Kansas, School of Pharmacy, Lawrence, Kansas.
Purdue University, College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7648. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7648.
To evaluate a clinical documentation rubric for pharmacotherapy problem-based learning (PBL) courses using inter-rater reliability (IRR) among different evaluators. A rubric was adapted for use in grading student pharmacists' clinical documentation in pharmacotherapy PBL courses. Multiple faculty evaluators used the rubric to assess student pharmacists' clinical documentation. The mean rubric score given by the evaluators and the standard deviation were calculated. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the rubric. Three hundred seventeen clinical documentation submissions were scored twice by multiple evaluators using the rubric. The mean initial evaluation score was 9.1 (SD=0.9) and the mean second evaluation score was 9.1 (SD=0.9), with no significant difference found between the two. The overall ICC was 0.7 across multiple graders, indicating good IRR. The clinical documentation rubric demonstrated overall good IRR between multiple evaluators when used in pharmacotherapy PBL courses. The rubric will undergo additional evaluation and continuous quality improvement to ensure that student pharmacists are provided with the formative feedback they need.
评估临床文档药物治疗基于问题学习(PBL)课程的评分标准,以不同评估者之间的评分者间信度(IRR)为指标。我们对评分标准进行了调整,以用于评估药剂学生在药物治疗 PBL 课程中的临床文档。多位教师评估者使用该评分标准来评估药剂学生的临床文档。计算了评估者给出的平均评分标准分数和标准差。计算了组内相关系数(ICC),以确定评分标准的评分者间信度(IRR)。使用评分标准对 317 份临床文档提交进行了两次评分,由多位评估者完成。初始评估得分的平均值为 9.1(SD=0.9),第二次评估得分的平均值为 9.1(SD=0.9),两者之间无显著差异。多位评分者的总体 ICC 为 0.7,表明 IRR 良好。在药物治疗 PBL 课程中使用该评分标准时,多个评估者之间的临床文档评分标准总体上具有良好的 IRR。该评分标准将进行进一步评估和持续质量改进,以确保为药剂学生提供他们所需的形成性反馈。