Suppr超能文献

一份用于评估批判性文献评价技能的评分标准。

A rubric to assess critical literature evaluation skills.

作者信息

Blommel Matthew L, Abate Marie A

机构信息

West Virginia Center for Drug and Health Information, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):63. doi: 10.5688/aj710463.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and describe the use of a rubric for reinforcing critical literature evaluation skills and assessing journal article critiques presented by pharmacy students during journal club exercises.

DESIGN

A rubric was developed, tested, and revised as needed to guide students in presenting a published study critique during the second through fourth years of a first-professional doctor of pharmacy degree curriculum and to help faculty members assess student performance and provide formative feedback. Through each rubric iteration, the ease of use and clarity for both evaluators and students were determined with modifications made as indicated. Student feedback was obtained after using the rubric for journal article exercises, and interrater reliability of the rubric was determined.

ASSESSMENT

Student feedback regarding rubric use for preparing a clinical study critique was positive across years. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high for each rubric section. The rubric was modified a total of 5 times based upon student feedback and faculty discussions.

CONCLUSION

A properly designed and tested rubric can be a useful tool for evaluating student performance during a journal article presentation; however, a rubric can take considerable time to develop. A rubric can also be a valuable student learning aid for applying literature evaluation concepts to the critique of a published study.

摘要

目的

制定并描述一种评分标准的使用方法,该评分标准用于强化批判性文献评估技能,并评估药学专业学生在期刊俱乐部活动中对期刊文章的评论。

设计

制定了一个评分标准,根据需要进行测试和修订,以指导学生在药学专业第一阶段博士学位课程的第二至第四年对已发表的研究进行评论,并帮助教师评估学生的表现并提供形成性反馈。在每次评分标准迭代过程中,根据指示进行修改,确定其对评估者和学生的易用性和清晰度。在使用评分标准进行期刊文章练习后,收集学生反馈,并确定评分标准的评分者间信度。

评估

多年来,学生对使用评分标准准备临床研究评论的反馈都是积极的。每个评分标准部分的组内相关系数都很高。根据学生反馈和教师讨论,该评分标准总共修改了5次。

结论

一个经过合理设计和测试的评分标准可以成为评估学生在期刊文章展示中表现的有用工具;然而,制定一个评分标准可能需要花费大量时间。评分标准对于学生将文献评估概念应用于已发表研究的评论也可能是一个有价值的学习辅助工具。

相似文献

1
A rubric to assess critical literature evaluation skills.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):63. doi: 10.5688/aj710463.
2
A diabetes self-management education class taught by pharmacy students.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Feb 10;76(1):13. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76113.
3
Striving for interrater reliability with a patient counseling assessment rubric: Lessons learned.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Jun;12(6):603-613. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):130. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757130.
6
[Rubric Assessment for Pharmacotherapy in Spiral Curriculum: Development and Usefulness Evaluation].
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2020;140(12):1441-1454. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.20-00029.
7
Development and validation of the self-care counseling rubric (SCCR) to assess student self-care counseling skills.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Aug;11(8):774-781. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
8
Evaluation of a Rubric to Assess Pharmacy Student Performance in a Telehealth Simulation Exercise.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Nov;86(8):ajpe8778. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8778. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

4
Inter-Rater Reliability of Web-Based Calibrated Peer Review within a Pharmacy Curriculum.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Apr;84(4):7583. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7583.
6
Critical Appraisal of Biomedical Literature With a Succinct Journal Club Template: The ROOTs Format.
Hosp Pharm. 2017 Jul;52(7):488-495. doi: 10.1177/0018578717721104. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
7
Reliability of rubrics in the assessment of orthodontic oral presentation.
Saudi Dent J. 2017 Oct;29(4):135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
8
Teaching Student Pharmacists to Apply Drug Literature to Patient Cases.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Mar 25;81(2):34. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81234.
10
Medical Literature Evaluation Education at US Schools of Pharmacy.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Feb 25;80(1):5. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8015.

本文引用的文献

2
Journal club 101 for the new practitioner: evaluation of a clinical trial.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Sep 15;61(18):1885-7. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.18.1885.
3
Designing, conducting, and evaluating journal clubs in orthopaedic surgery.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug(413):146-57. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000081203.51121.25.
5
Critical appraisal in clinical practice: sometimes irrelevant, occasionally invalid.
J R Soc Med. 2001 Nov;94(11):573-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680109401105.
6
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012.
7
A checklist system for critical review of medical literature.
Med Educ. 1985 Sep;19(5):392-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01343.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验