Department of Interventional Therapy, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 21;26(27):3975-3988. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3975.
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) have shown promising local benefits for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). S-1, a composite preparation of a 5-fluorouracil prodrug, has proven to be a convenient oral chemotherapeutic agent with definite efficacy against advanced HCC.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE followed by HAIC with or without oral S-1 for treating advanced HCC.
In this single-center, open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 117 participants with advanced HCC were randomized to receive TACE followed by oxaliplatin-based HAIC either with (TACE/HAIC + S-1, = 56) or without (TACE/HAIC, = 61) oral S-1 between December 2013 and September 2017. Two participants were excluded from final analysis for withdrawing consent. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate and safety.
In total, 115 participants (100 males and 15 females; mean age, 57.7 years ± 11.9) were analyzed. The median PFS and OS were 5.0 mo (0.4-58.6 mo) (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.82 to 6.18) 4.4 mo (1.1-54.4 mo) (95%CI: 2.54 to 6.26; = 0.585) and 8.4 mo (0.4-58.6 mo) (95%CI: 6.88 to 9.92) 8.3 mo (1.4-54.4 m) (95%CI: 5.71 to 10.96; = 0.985) in the TACE/HAIC + S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 30.9% 18.4% and 72.7% 56.7% in the TACE/HAIC + S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events had a similar frequency in both treatment groups.
No improvements in tumor response rates, PFS or OS were observed with the addition of S-1 to TACE/HAIC in advanced HCC. Both treatment regimens had a similar safety profile.
经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)和肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)已显示出对晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的局部疗效。S-1 是一种 5-氟尿嘧啶前体药物的复合制剂,已被证明是一种方便的口服化疗药物,对晚期 HCC 具有明确疗效。
评估 TACE 联合或不联合口服 S-1 行 HAIC 治疗晚期 HCC 的疗效和安全性。
在这项单中心、开放标签、前瞻性、随机对照试验中,117 例晚期 HCC 患者于 2013 年 12 月至 2017 年 9 月被随机分为 TACE 联合奥沙利铂为基础的 HAIC 组(TACE/HAIC + S-1,n=56)或 TACE 联合 HAIC 组(TACE/HAIC,n=61),两组均口服 S-1。有 2 例患者因撤回同意而被排除在最终分析之外。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率、疾病控制率和安全性。
共分析了 115 例患者(100 例男性,15 例女性;平均年龄 57.7 岁±11.9 岁)。中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 5.0 个月(0.4-58.6 个月)(95%CI:3.82-6.18)和 4.4 个月(1.1-54.4 个月)(95%CI:2.54-6.26; = 0.585)和 8.4 个月(0.4-58.6 个月)(95%CI:6.88-9.92)和 8.3 个月(1.4-54.4 个月)(95%CI:5.71-10.96; = 0.985)在 TACE/HAIC + S-1 和 TACE/HAIC 组中,分别。TACE/HAIC + S-1 和 TACE/HAIC 组的客观缓解率和疾病控制率分别为 30.9%和 18.4%和 72.7%和 56.7%。两组治疗的 3/4 级不良事件发生率相似。
在晚期 HCC 中,S-1 联合 TACE/HAIC 并未提高肿瘤反应率、PFS 或 OS。两种治疗方案的安全性相似。