• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻足球运动员递增式跑步场地测试与跑步机测试的比较

A Comparison of Incremental Running Field and Treadmill Tests in Young Soccer Players.

作者信息

Köklü Yusuf, Alemdaroğlu Utku, Demirhan Ramazan, Arslan Yunus

机构信息

Pamukkale University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2020 Jul 21;73:193-201. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0143. eCollection 2020 Jul.

DOI:10.2478/hukin-2019-0143
PMID:32774550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7386147/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the incremental running tests performed by young soccer players on a treadmill (Tr) and in the field (FT: 100 m change of direction and FT: 100 m circle). Nineteen players (average age 17.4 ± 1.1 years; body height 172.0 ± 5.7 cm; body mass 68.9 ± 6.7 kg) volunteered to perform incremental Tr , FT and FT running tests. In all three tests, players ran for 3 min at 8, 10, 12 and 14 km∙h and were given a 1 min rest interval between subsequent stages. Blood lactate concentrations (La) were measured at 1 min rest intervals and the heart rate (HR) responses of players were recorded during the tests. After a 5 min recovery period, the second part of the test started; players ran at 15 km∙h with velocity increments of 1 km∙h every 1 min until exhaustion. This part was performed to determine maximum HR, maximum La and the players' final velocities. The results showed that players had significantly lower La (F = 6.93, p = 0.07, η = 0.46, 95%CI = -1.91/-0.34, 95%CI = -1.59/-0.05) and HR (F = 9.08, p = 0.02, η = 0.53, 95%CI = -6.98/-1.68, 95%CI = -7.19/1.08) responses in the Tr test than in the FT and FT tests at 14 km∙h. It was also found that players completed the Tr test (F = 58.22, p = 0.00, η = 0.87) at higher final running velocities than the FT (95%CI = 1.67/2.78) and FT (95%CI = 1.69/2.85) tests. In conclusion, when coaches or sports scientists plan to train at higher running velocities or according to the final velocity in the test, it is advisable to carry out testing in the circumstances under which training will be carried out (in the field or on a treadmill).

摘要

本研究的目的是比较年轻足球运动员在跑步机(Tr)上和在室外场地(FT:100米变向跑和FT:100米圆周跑)进行的递增跑测试。19名运动员(平均年龄17.4±1.1岁;身高172.0±5.7厘米;体重68.9±6.7千克)自愿参加递增Tr、FT和FT跑测试。在所有三项测试中,运动员以8、10、12和14千米/小时的速度跑3分钟,随后各阶段之间有1分钟的休息间隔。在1分钟休息间隔时测量血乳酸浓度(La),并在测试期间记录运动员的心率(HR)反应。经过5分钟的恢复期后,测试的第二部分开始;运动员以15千米/小时的速度跑步,每1分钟速度增加1千米/小时,直至精疲力竭。进行这部分测试是为了确定最大心率、最大血乳酸浓度和运动员的最终速度。结果表明,在14千米/小时时,与FT和FT测试相比,运动员在Tr测试中的血乳酸浓度(F = 6.93,p = 0.07,η = 0.46,95%CI = -1.91/-0.34,95%CI = -1.59/-0.05)和心率(F = 9.08,p = 0.02,η = 0.53,95%CI = -6.98/-1.68,95%CI = -7.19/1.08)反应显著更低。还发现,与FT(95%CI = 1.67/2.78)和FT(95%CI = 1.69/2.85)测试相比,运动员在Tr测试中以更高的最终跑步速度完成测试(F = 58.22,p = 0.00,η = 0.87)。总之,当教练或运动科学家计划以更高的跑步速度进行训练或根据测试中的最终速度进行训练时,建议在训练将进行的环境(室外场地或跑步机上)进行测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/7386147/a5261f082951/hukin-73-193-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/7386147/131eae7a4455/hukin-73-193-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/7386147/f8536f27c105/hukin-73-193-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/7386147/a5261f082951/hukin-73-193-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/7386147/131eae7a4455/hukin-73-193-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/7386147/f8536f27c105/hukin-73-193-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e4/7386147/a5261f082951/hukin-73-193-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Incremental Running Field and Treadmill Tests in Young Soccer Players.年轻足球运动员递增式跑步场地测试与跑步机测试的比较
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Jul 21;73:193-201. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0143. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Comparison of physiological responses to an incremental running test on treadmill, natural grass, and synthetic turf in young soccer players.年轻足球运动员在跑步机、天然草坪和人造草坪上进行递增式跑步测试时的生理反应比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 May;23(3):939-45. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a07b6e.
3
Can heart rate values obtained from laboratory and field lactate tests be used interchangeably to prescribe exercise intensity for soccer players?从实验室和现场乳酸测试获得的心率值能否互换使用,以规定足球运动员的运动强度?
Adv Ther. 2007 Jul-Aug;24(4):890-902. doi: 10.1007/BF02849982.
4
Running velocities and heart rates at fixed blood lactate concentrations in elite soccer players.精英足球运动员在固定血乳酸浓度下的跑步速度和心率。
Adv Ther. 2005 Nov-Dec;22(6):613-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02849955.
5
The Hoff circuit test is more specific than an incremental treadmill test to assess endurance with the ball in youth soccer players.在评估青少年足球运动员控球耐力方面,霍夫循环测试比递增式跑步机测试更具特异性。
Biol Sport. 2016 Sep;33(3):263-8. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1201913. Epub 2016 May 11.
6
Running velocities and heart rates at fixed blood lactate concentrations in young soccer players.年轻足球运动员在固定血乳酸浓度下的跑步速度和心率
Adv Ther. 2006 May-Jun;23(3):395-403. doi: 10.1007/BF02850160.
7
Effect of ramp slope on different methods to determine lactate threshold in semi-professional soccer players.斜坡斜率对不同方法在半职业足球运动员中确定乳酸阈的影响。
Res Sports Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;27(3):326-338. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2018.1523790. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
8
Differences in Player Position Running Velocity at Lactate Thresholds Among Male Professional German Soccer Players.德国男性职业足球运动员在乳酸阈值时球员位置的跑步速度差异
Front Physiol. 2019 Jul 9;10:886. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00886. eCollection 2019.
9
Comparison of the 45-second/15-second intermittent running field test and the continuous treadmill test.45 秒/15 秒间歇跑步测试与连续跑步机测试的比较。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012 Sep;7(3):277-84. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.7.3.277.
10
The Yo-Yo IE2 test: physiological response for untrained men versus trained soccer players.溜溜球间歇耐力测试2:未经训练的男性与训练有素的足球运动员的生理反应。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jan;47(1):100-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000377.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities.比较在相似强度下使用非机动和传统电动跑步机跑步的生理反应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 8;12(1):11626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13741-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Soccer Players: Is Test Specificity the Issue?-A Review.评估足球运动员的心肺适能:测试特异性是问题所在吗?——一篇综述
Sports Med Open. 2018 Jun 19;4(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0134-3.
2
Determination of Aerobic Performance in Youth Soccer Players: Effect of Direct And Indirect Methods.青少年足球运动员有氧能力的测定:直接法与间接法的效果
J Hum Kinet. 2017 Mar 11;56:109-118. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0028. eCollection 2017 Feb.
3
Evaluation of the Match External Load in Soccer: Methods Comparison.
足球比赛外部负荷的评估:方法比较
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Apr;12(4):490-495. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0160. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
4
Physical Demands of Top-Class Soccer Friendly Matches in Relation to a Playing Position Using Global Positioning System Technology.运用全球定位系统技术,顶级足球友谊赛对不同比赛位置的体能要求
J Hum Kinet. 2015 Oct 14;47:179-88. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0073. eCollection 2015 Sep 29.
5
Reliability of the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test in Semiprofessional Soccer Players.30-15间歇体能测试在半职业足球运动员中的可靠性
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Mar;11(2):172-5. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0056. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
6
Acceleration and sprint profiles of a professional elite football team in match play.职业精英足球队在比赛中的加速和冲刺概况。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(2):101-10. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.933879. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
7
A pilot study comparing two field tests with the treadmill run test in soccer players.一项比较两种现场测试与足球运动员跑步机测试的初步研究。
J Sports Sci Med. 2005 Jun 1;4(2):105-12.
8
Metabolic demands of match performance in young soccer players.年轻足球运动员比赛表现的代谢需求。
J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Mar 1;11(1):170-9. eCollection 2012.
9
Relationships between field performance tests in high-level soccer players.高水平足球运动员场地表现测试之间的关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Apr;28(4):942-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1f861.
10
Comparison between three different endurance tests in professional soccer players.三种不同耐力测试在职业足球运动员中的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jan;27(1):31-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824e1711.