Tagliabue Fulvio, Burati Morena, Chiarelli Marco, Fumagalli Luca, Guttadauro Angelo, Arborio Elisa, De Simone Matilde, Cioffi Ugo
Department of Robotic and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale A. Manzoni, ASST Lecco, Lecco 23900, Italy.
Department of Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Istituti Clinici Zucchi, Monza 20900, Italy.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jun 27;12(6):287-297. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i6.287.
Several studies have shown the safety, feasibility and oncologic adequacy of robotic right hemicolectomy (RRH). Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) is considered technically challenging. Robotic surgery has been introduced to overcome this technical limitation, but it is related to high costs. To maximize the benefits of such surgery, only selected patients are candidates for this technique. In addition, due to progressive aging of the population, an increasing number of minimally invasive procedures are performed on elderly patients with severe comorbidities, who are usually more prone to post-operative complications.
To investigate the outcomes of RRH LRH with regard to age and comorbidities.
We retrospectively analyzed 123 minimally invasive procedures (68 LRHs 55 RRHs) for right colon cancer or endoscopically unresectable adenoma performed in our Center from January 2014 until September 2019. The surgical procedures were performed according to standardized techniques. The primary clinical outcome of the study was the length of hospital stay (LOS) measured in days. Secondary outcomes were time to first flatus (TFF) and time to first stool evacuation. The robotic technique was considered the exposure and the laparoscopic technique was considered the control. Routine demographic variables were obtained, including age at time of surgery and gender. Body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status were registered. The age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) was calculated; the tumor-node-metastasis system, intra-operative variables and post-operative complications were recorded. Post-operative follow-up was 180 d.
LOS, TFF, and time to first stool were significantly shorter in the robotic group: Median 6 [interquartile range (IQR) 5-8] 7 (IQR 6-10.5) d, = 0.028; median 2 (IQR 1-3) 3 (IQR 2-4) d, < 0.001; median 4 (IQR 3-5) 5 (IQR 4-6.5) d, = 0.005, respectively. Following multivariable analysis, the robotic technique was confirmed to be predictive of significantly shorter hospitalization and faster restoration of bowel function; in addition the dichotomous variables of age over 75 years and ACCI more than 7 were significant predictors of hospital stay. No outcomes were significantly associated with Clavien-Dindo grading. Sub-group analysis demonstrated that patients aged over 75 years had a longer LOS (median 6 -IQR 5-8- 7 -IQR 6-12- d, = 0.013) and later TFF (median 2 -IQR 1-3- 3 -IQR 2-4- d, = 0.008), while patients with ACCI more than 7 were only associated with a prolonged hospital stay (median 7 -IQR 5-8- 7 -IQR 6-14.5- d, = 0.036).
RRH is related to shorter LOS when compared with the laparoscopic approach, but older age and several comorbidities tend to reduce its benefits.
多项研究已证实机器人辅助右半结肠切除术(RRH)的安全性、可行性及肿瘤学疗效。腹腔镜右半结肠切除术(LRH)在技术上具有挑战性。引入机器人手术是为了克服这一技术限制,但它成本高昂。为使此类手术的益处最大化,仅特定患者适合该技术。此外,由于人口老龄化加剧,越来越多的老年重症合并症患者接受微创手术,这类患者通常更易出现术后并发症。
探讨RRH和LRH在年龄及合并症方面的手术效果。
我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2019年9月在本中心进行的123例针对右结肠癌或内镜下不可切除腺瘤的微创手术(68例LRH和55例RRH)。手术按照标准化技术进行。本研究的主要临床结局是以天数衡量的住院时间(LOS)。次要结局为首次排气时间(TFF)和首次排便时间。将机器人技术组视为暴露组,腹腔镜技术组视为对照组。获取常规人口统计学变量,包括手术时的年龄和性别。记录体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级。计算年龄调整后的Charlson合并症指数(ACCI);记录肿瘤-淋巴结-转移系统、术中变量及术后并发症。术后随访180天。
机器人手术组的LOS、TFF和首次排便时间显著更短:中位数分别为6天[四分位间距(IQR)5 - 8天]对比LRH组的7天(IQR 6 - 10.5天),P = 0.028;中位数2天(IQR 1 - 3天)对比3天(IQR 2 - 4天),P < 0.001;中位数4天(IQR 3 - 5天)对比5天(IQR 4 - 6.5天),P = 0.005。多变量分析后,证实机器人技术可显著预测住院时间更短及肠功能恢复更快;此外,年龄超过75岁和ACCI大于7的二分变量是住院时间的显著预测因素。无结局与Clavien-Dindo分级显著相关。亚组分析表明,年龄超过75岁的患者LOS更长(中位数6天 - IQR为5 - 8天对比7天 - IQR为6 - 12天,P = 0.013)且TFF更晚(中位数2天 - IQR为1 - 3天对比3天 - IQR为2 - 4天,P = 0.008),而ACCI大于7的患者仅与住院时间延长相关(中位数7天 - IQR为5 - 8天对比7天 - IQR为6 - 14.5天,P = 0.036)。
与腹腔镜手术相比,RRH的住院时间更短,但高龄和多种合并症往往会降低其优势。