• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实现腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的高质量标准:基于德尔菲共识的立场文件。

Achieving high quality standards in laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: A Delphi consensus-based position paper.

机构信息

General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

General Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;44(4):469-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.091.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.091
PMID:29422252
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the rate of laparoscopic colectomies for colon cancer using registries and population-based studies. To provide a position paper on mini-invasive (MIS) colon cancer surgery based on the opinion of experts leader in this field.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines for the rate of laparoscopy in colon cancer. Moreover, Delphi methodology was used to reach consensus among 35 international experts in four study rounds. Consensus was defined as an agreement ≥75.0%. Domains of interest included nosology, essential technical/oncological requirements, outcomes and MIS training.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies from 42 articles were reviewed. Although it is still sub-optimal, the rate of MIS for colon cancer increased over the years and it is currently >50% in Korea, Netherlands, UK and Australia. The remaining European countries are un-investigated and presented lower rates with highest variations, ranging 7-35%. Using Delphi methodology, a laparoscopic colectomy was defined as a "colon resection performed using key-hole surgery independently from the type of anastomosis". The panel defined also the oncological requirements recognized essential for the procedure and agreed that when performed by experienced surgeons, it should be marked as best practice in guidelines, given the principles of oncologic surgery be respected (R0 procedure, vessel ligation and mesocolon integrity).

CONCLUSION

The rate of MIS colectomies for cancer in Europe should be further investigated. A panel of leaders in this field defined laparoscopic colectomy as a best practice procedure when performed by an experienced surgeon respecting the standards of surgical oncology.

摘要

目的

通过注册和基于人群的研究调查结肠癌腹腔镜切除术的比例。根据该领域专家的意见,提供一份关于微创(MIS)结肠癌手术的立场文件。

方法

使用 PRISMA 指南对结肠癌腹腔镜手术的比例进行了系统的文献回顾。此外,还使用德尔菲法在四轮研究中达成了 35 名国际专家的共识。共识定义为≥75.0%的协议。关注的领域包括分类学、基本技术/肿瘤学要求、结果和 MIS 培训。

结果

从 42 篇文章中综述了 44 项研究。尽管仍然不理想,但近年来,MIS 治疗结肠癌的比例有所增加,目前在韩国、荷兰、英国和澳大利亚超过 50%。其余欧洲国家尚未进行调查,其比例较低,差异最大,范围为 7-35%。使用德尔菲法,腹腔镜结肠切除术被定义为“使用微创技术进行的结肠切除术,独立于吻合类型”。专家组还定义了被认为对该手术必不可少的肿瘤学要求,并一致认为,当由经验丰富的外科医生进行操作时,应将其标记为指南中的最佳实践,因为应尊重肿瘤外科的原则(R0 手术、血管结扎和结肠系膜完整性)。

结论

欧洲 MIS 结肠癌切除术的比例应进一步调查。该领域的专家小组将腹腔镜结肠切除术定义为经验丰富的外科医生在尊重手术肿瘤学标准的情况下实施的最佳实践程序。

相似文献

1
Achieving high quality standards in laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: A Delphi consensus-based position paper.实现腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的高质量标准:基于德尔菲共识的立场文件。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;44(4):469-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.091.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Standardizing the Definition of Each Colon Cancer Segment: Delphi Consensus on Clinical Decision-Making for Oncologic Outcomes.规范各结肠癌节段的定义:关于肿瘤学结局临床决策的德尔菲共识
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003739.
9
A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment.促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯治疗癌症相关性贫血(尤其是癌症治疗所致贫血)的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(13):1-202, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11130.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Role of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Disease.机器人手术在结直肠疾病中的当前作用
Visc Med. 2025 Apr 15:1-7. doi: 10.1159/000545418.
2
Total Minimally Invasive Curative Staged Resections After Induction Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Rectal Cancer.转移性直肠癌诱导系统治疗后的完全微创分步切除术。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Nov;7(11):e70051. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70051.
3
Chinese national clinical practice guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer.中国早期结直肠癌预防、诊断和治疗临床实践指南。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Sep 5;137(17):2017-2039. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003253. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
4
Conversion rate to open surgery during transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: a single-center experience.经肛全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌中转开腹率:单中心经验。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):943-947. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01844-0. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
5
Diverticulitis, surgery, evidence-based medicine, and the Steve Jobs' dots: a narrative review.憩室炎、手术、循证医学与史蒂夫·乔布斯的“点”:一篇叙述性综述
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Feb;50(1):81-91. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02362-1. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
The impact of preoperative nutritional screening, ERAS protocol, and mini-invasive surgery in surgical oncology: A multi-institutional SEM analysis of patients with digestive cancer.术前营养筛查、加速康复外科(ERAS)方案及微创手术在外科肿瘤学中的影响:一项针对消化道癌症患者的多机构结构方程模型分析
Front Nutr. 2023 Mar 16;10:1041153. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1041153. eCollection 2023.
7
Right colectomy from open to robotic - a single-center experience with functional outcomes in a learning-curve setting.开腹至机器人右半结肠切除术——学习曲线设定下的单中心经验与功能结局。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):2915-2927. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02576-8. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
8
The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology.意大利关于同时性结直肠原发癌和肝转移瘤微创同期切除术的共识:德尔菲法。
Updates Surg. 2021 Aug;73(4):1247-1265. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01100-9. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
9
[Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].[结肠和直肠微创肿瘤手术的证据]
Chirurg. 2021 Apr;92(4):334-343. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01320-6.
10
Early stage colon cancer: Current treatment standards, evolving paradigms, and future directions.早期结肠癌:当前治疗标准、不断演变的模式及未来方向。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Aug 15;12(8):808-832. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.808.