Suppr超能文献

减少血液透析患者的静脉穿刺:一项质量改进研究。

Reducing Phlebotomy in Hemodialysis Patients: A Quality Improvement Study.

作者信息

McCoy Ian E, Shieh Lisa, Fatehi Pedram

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.

Division of Hospital Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.

出版信息

Kidney Med. 2020 Jun 15;2(4):432-436. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.05.006. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Hospitalized patients receiving hemodialysis frequently have routine, daily laboratory studies drawn by peripheral venipuncture-a painful process that damages peripheral veins that may be needed for future dialysis access. Some of these peripheral venipunctures are likely preventable by drawing blood samples off the hemodialysis machine circuit. We describe an initiative to allow and encourage blood to be drawn "with dialysis."

STUDY DESIGN

Quality improvement study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Non-critically ill adult patients treated with hemodialysis at Stanford Health Care between September 2018 and September 2019.

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES

We modified the electronic health record to allow providers to order laboratory studies with the frequency "with dialysis." Use of the "with dialysis" frequency was promoted through educational efforts aimed at primary medical teams, nephrology consult staff, and nephrology advanced practice providers.

OUTCOMES

We tracked the number of "with dialysis" blood draws and the number of eligible patients per week during the first year of implementation.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

The number of "with dialysis" blood draws and eligible patients per week were measured over time. Cost savings were estimated by multiplying the difference in cost between peripheral venipuncture and "with dialysis" blood draw by the number of "with dialysis" blood draws performed.

RESULTS

Uptake during the first year of implementation was an average of 6.3 "with dialysis" draws per 100 eligible patients per week. Estimated savings exceeded $7,000 in the first year of the program.

LIMITATIONS

Our single-center study may not be generalizable to other institutions, especially those without dialysis ordering and laboratory ordering housed within the same electronic system. We were unable to track additional outcomes, including the number of peripheral venipunctures and delays in laboratory results.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevention of unnecessary peripheral venipuncture in hospitalized patients receiving hemodialysis is a promising and valuable quality improvement target, which may be aided by the electronic health record. Future work is needed to increase recognition and use of "with dialysis"blood work options.

摘要

原理与目的

接受血液透析的住院患者经常需要通过外周静脉穿刺进行常规的每日实验室检查,这是一个痛苦的过程,会损害外周静脉,而这些静脉可能是未来进行透析通路所需的。通过从血液透析机回路中采集血样,一些外周静脉穿刺可能是可以避免的。我们描述了一项允许并鼓励在“透析时”采血的倡议。

研究设计

质量改进研究。

研究地点与参与者

2018年9月至2019年9月期间在斯坦福医疗保健中心接受血液透析治疗的非危重症成年患者。

质量改进活动

我们修改了电子健康记录,允许医护人员以“透析时”的频率开具实验室检查医嘱。通过针对初级医疗团队、肾脏科会诊人员和肾脏科高级执业医护人员的教育活动,推广使用“透析时”的频率。

结果

我们追踪了实施第一年中每周“透析时”采血的次数以及符合条件的患者数量。

分析方法

随着时间的推移,测量每周“透析时”采血的次数和符合条件的患者数量。通过将外周静脉穿刺与“透析时”采血的成本差异乘以“透析时”采血的次数来估算成本节约情况。

结果

在实施的第一年,平均每100名符合条件的患者每周有6.3次“透析时”采血。该项目第一年估计节省超过7000美元。

局限性

我们的单中心研究可能无法推广到其他机构,尤其是那些在同一电子系统中没有透析医嘱和实验室医嘱功能的机构。我们无法追踪其他结果,包括外周静脉穿刺的次数和实验室结果的延迟情况。

结论

预防接受血液透析的住院患者不必要的外周静脉穿刺是一个有前景且有价值的质量改进目标,电子健康记录可能对此有所帮助。未来需要开展工作,以提高对“透析时”血液检查选项的认识和使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbff/7406848/5f8d5b55721d/fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验