Calhoun Aaron W, Pian-Smith May, Shah Anjan, Levine Adam, Gaba David, DeMaria Samuel, Goldberg Andrew, Meyer Elaine C
From the Department of Pediatrics (A.C.), University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY; Department of Anesthesia (M.P.-S.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Anesthesia (A.S., A.L., S.D., A.G.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Anesthesia (D.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; and Department of Psychiatry and Center for Bioethics (E.M.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Simul Healthc. 2020 Aug;15(4):282-288. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000440.
Many techniques and modifications commonly used by the simulation community have been identified as deceptive. Deception is an important issue addressed by both the newly adopted Healthcare Simulationist Code of Ethics and the American Psychological Association Code of Conduct. Some view these approaches as essential whereas others question their necessity as well as their untoward psychological effects. In an attempt to offer guidance to simulation-based healthcare educators, we explore educational practices commonly identified as deceptive along with their potential benefits and detriments. We then address important decision points and high-risk situations that should be avoided to uphold ethical boundaries and psychological safety among learners. These are subsequently analyzed in light of the Code of Ethics and used to formulate guidelines for educators that are intended to ensure that deception, when necessary, is implemented in as psychologically safe a manner as possible.
模拟领域常用的许多技术和改进方法已被认定具有欺骗性。欺骗是新通过的《医疗模拟伦理准则》和《美国心理协会行为准则》都涉及的一个重要问题。一些人认为这些方法至关重要,而另一些人则质疑其必要性以及不良的心理影响。为了给基于模拟的医疗教育工作者提供指导,我们探讨了通常被认定具有欺骗性的教育实践及其潜在的益处和危害。然后,我们阐述了为维护学习者的道德界限和心理安全应避免的重要决策点和高风险情况。随后根据《伦理准则》对这些内容进行分析,并用于为教育工作者制定指导方针,旨在确保在必要时以尽可能心理安全的方式实施欺骗行为。