Sports Medicine and Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Movement Sciences and Health, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA.
Biomechanics and Sports Medicine Laboratory, Department of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020 Oct;54:102454. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102454. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
This study assessed ankle kinematics, surface electromyography, and center-of-pressure (COP) progression relative to the medial border of the foot during a side-cutting task in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI). Thirty participants (CAI = 15; Controls = 15) performed a side-cutting task on a force platform while 3-dimentional ankle kinematics, COP position, and surface electromyography from the tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, fibularis longus, fibularis brevis, vastus medialis, and semitendinosus were recorded on the testing leg. Ankle kinematics, root-mean-square muscle activity and COP position relative to the medial boarder of the foot were compared between CAI and healthy controls (p < 0.05). Significantly greater ankle internal rotation from 35-54% of the stance phase (p = 0.032) was found for the CAI group compared to controls. Furthermore, significantly greater tibialis anterior muscle activity from 86-94% of the stance phase (p = 0.022) and a more medial COP position from 81-100% (p < 0.05) and of the stance phase was also observed in the CAI group. Less lateral COP progression and increased tibialis anterior activation in the CAI group could reflect a protective movement strategy during anticipated side-cutting to avoid recurrent injury. However, greater ankle internal rotation during mid-stance highlights a potential 'giving way' mechanism in individuals with CAI.
本研究评估了慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)患者和无 CAI 患者在进行侧跨步任务时踝关节运动学、表面肌电图和压力中心(COP)相对于足内侧缘的进展情况。30 名参与者(CAI=15;对照组=15)在力台上进行侧跨步任务,同时记录测试腿的三维踝关节运动学、COP 位置和胫骨前肌、内侧腓肠肌、腓骨长肌、腓骨短肌、股四头肌内侧和半腱肌的表面肌电图。CAI 和健康对照组之间比较了踝关节运动学、均方根肌肉活动和 COP 相对于足内侧缘的位置(p<0.05)。与对照组相比,CAI 组在 35-54%的站立阶段观察到明显更大的踝关节内旋(p=0.032)。此外,CAI 组在 86-94%的站立阶段观察到明显更大的胫骨前肌活动(p=0.022)和 81-100%的站立阶段更靠内侧的 COP 位置(p<0.05)。CAI 组在侧跨步期间,较小的外侧 COP 进展和增加的胫骨前肌激活可能反映了一种保护运动策略,以避免复发性损伤。然而,在中期站立时更大的踝关节内旋突出了 CAI 患者潜在的“让步”机制。