• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与医疗法证检查就诊患者中的执法报告相关的因素。

Factors Associated With Law Enforcement Reporting in Patients Presenting for Medical Forensic Examinations.

机构信息

Texas A&M University College of Nursing, Bryan, USA.

The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):NP3269-NP3292. doi: 10.1177/0886260520948518. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1177/0886260520948518
PMID:32779504
Abstract

Law enforcement reporting following sexual assault is lower than for other violent crimes. Sexual assault nurse examiners (SANEs) provide care for patients in the acute period following sexual assault and are well-positioned to identify and address barriers to reporting. We examined data from medical forensic examination records documented by SANEs for a 5-year period (2011-2015). We examined 347 records of women 18 and older to identify factors associated with law enforcement reporting at the time of the exam using binomial logistic regression to construct odds ratios (OR). A total of 56.5% of patients in the sample reported to law enforcement. Patients who did not voluntarily consume alcohol were more likely to report than those who did (OR = 4.45; = .001). Patients who were not students were more likely to report than students (OR = 3.24; = .002). Patients who had a medical forensic exam within 32 hr of the assault were more likely to report than those having exams after 32 hr (OR = 2.68; = .007). Patients who had anogenital and/or bodily injuries were more likely to report than those who had no injuries (OR = 2.50; = .008). Patients who were penetrated (vaginally, orally, and/or anally) were more likely to report than those who were not penetrated (OR = 2.50; = .056). Knowing the assailant, having multiple assailants, and patient and assailant race/ethnicity were not associated with different likelihood of reporting to law enforcement. SANEs and others who work with victims of sexual assault can use data to understand and address barriers to reporting.

摘要

执法部门对性侵犯案件的报告率低于其他暴力犯罪。性侵犯护士检查师(SANEs)为性侵犯后急性发作期的患者提供护理,他们能够很好地识别和解决报告障碍。我们对性侵犯护士检查师在 5 年内(2011-2015 年)记录的医疗法医检查记录中的数据进行了研究。我们对 347 名 18 岁及以上女性的记录进行了检查,以确定在检查时与执法报告相关的因素,使用二项逻辑回归构建优势比(OR)。在样本中,共有 56.5%的患者向执法部门报案。与自愿饮酒的患者相比,不自愿饮酒的患者更有可能报案(OR=4.45;p=.001)。与学生相比,非学生更有可能报案(OR=3.24;p=.002)。与在性侵犯后 32 小时内接受法医检查的患者相比,在 32 小时内接受检查的患者更有可能报案(OR=2.68;p=.007)。与没有受伤的患者相比,有肛门生殖器和/或身体受伤的患者更有可能报案(OR=2.50;p=.008)。与未被穿透的患者相比,被穿透(阴道、口腔和/或肛门)的患者更有可能报案(OR=2.50;p=.056)。认识袭击者、有多个袭击者、患者和袭击者的种族/民族与向执法部门报案的可能性不同无关。性侵犯护士检查师和其他与性侵犯受害者合作的人可以使用这些数据来了解和解决报告障碍。

相似文献

1
Factors Associated With Law Enforcement Reporting in Patients Presenting for Medical Forensic Examinations.与医疗法证检查就诊患者中的执法报告相关的因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):NP3269-NP3292. doi: 10.1177/0886260520948518. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Forensic medical results and law enforcement actions following sexual assault: A comparison of child, adolescent and adult cases.性侵犯案件的法医鉴定结果和执法行动:儿童、青少年和成年案件的比较。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Jul;93:103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 May 7.
3
The problem of untested sexual assault kits: why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory?未检测的性侵犯工具包问题:为什么有些工具包从未提交给犯罪实验室?
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Jul;27(11):2259-75. doi: 10.1177/0886260511432155. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
4
Examining the Implementation of the National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations.审查国家性侵犯法医检查协议的实施情况。
J Forensic Nurs. 2022;18(2):67-77. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000369. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
Rape Myth Acceptance and Other Barriers to Formally Reporting Sexual Assault Among College Students With and Without Sexual Assault Histories.有无性侵犯史的大学生对强奸谬见的认同及正式报告性侵犯的其他障碍
J Interpers Violence. 2023 May;38(9-10):6773-6797. doi: 10.1177/08862605221137703. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
6
The Influence of Sexual Assault Resistance on Reporting Tendencies and Law Enforcement Response: Findings From the National Crime Victimization Survey.性侵犯抵抗对报告倾向和执法反应的影响:来自全国犯罪受害情况调查的发现。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):NP11176-NP11197. doi: 10.1177/0886260519877946. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
7
Beyond Forensic Evidence: Examining Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Exam Mechanisms that Influence Sexual Assault Case Outcomes.超越法医证据:审视影响性侵犯案件结果的性侵犯医疗取证机制。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP5693-NP5727. doi: 10.1177/0886260520961870. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
8
Rural Location and Relative Location: Adding Community Context to the Study of Sexual Assault Survivor Time Until Presentation for Medical Care.农村地区和相对位置:将社区背景纳入性侵犯幸存者医疗就诊时间研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jul;34(14):2897-2919. doi: 10.1177/0886260516663900. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Original research: Giving sexual assault survivors time to decide: an exploration of the use and effects of the nonreport option.原始研究:给予性侵犯幸存者时间做出决定:对非报告选项的使用和效果的探索。
Am J Nurs. 2014 Mar;114(3):26-35; quiz 36, 49. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444489.49091.10.
10
Defining the boundaries: how sexual assault nurse examiners (SANEs) balance patient care and law enforcement collaboration.界定界限:性侵犯护士检查员(SANE)如何平衡患者护理与执法合作。
J Forensic Nurs. 2011 Mar;7(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01091.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailoring care, advancing justice: predictors of forensic and legal engagement in survivors of sexual violence.量身定制护理,推进司法公正:性暴力幸存者法医和法律介入的预测因素
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Jun 23;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00697-1.
2
Forensic interventions carried out by nurses on older people in situations of violence: a comparative study.护士在暴力情况下对老年人实施的法医干预措施:一项比较研究。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025 May 9;59:e20240282. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0282en. eCollection 2025.
3
Risk factors associated with drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) compared with non-DFSA - a systematic review.
与非药物辅助性侵犯(DFSA)相比,药物辅助性侵犯(DFSA)的相关风险因素——一项系统综述。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1007/s12024-025-00953-5.
4
Genital lacerations following sexual assault and consensual sexual intercourse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.性侵犯和双方自愿性交后发生的生殖器撕裂伤:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Forensic Sci. 2025 Jan;70(1):161-169. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15666. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
5
The prevalence of genital injuries in post-pubertal females presenting for forensic examination after reported sexual violence: a systematic review.青春期后女性在报告性暴力后接受法医检查时生殖器损伤的患病率:一项系统综述
Int J Legal Med. 2024 May;138(3):997-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03117-8. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
6
Reasons for Not Reporting Among Sexual Assault Survivors Who Seek Medical Forensic Exams: A Qualitative Analysis.性侵幸存者寻求医学法医检查但未报告的原因:定性分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 May;39(9-10):1905-1925. doi: 10.1177/08862605231211926. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
7
Factors Related to Police Reporting in Sexual Assault Care Centers: Are We Underestimating the Role of Support Persons?性侵犯护理中心与警方报告相关的因素:我们是否低估了支持人员的作用?
Violence Against Women. 2024 Dec;30(15-16):3943-3969. doi: 10.1177/10778012231183659. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
8
Improving the Forensic Documentation of Injuries Through Alternate Light: A Researcher-Practitioner Partnership.通过备用光源提高损伤法医学文件记录质量:研究-实践伙伴关系。
J Forensic Nurs. 2023;19(1):30-40. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000389. Epub 2022 Apr 5.