• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一线免疫抑制剂(FAST)治疗中霉酚酸酯与甲氨蝶呤作为激素节省治疗的 CD4 计数比较。

Comparison of CD4 Counts with Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Methotrexate from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial.

机构信息

F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2022 Jan 2;30(1):198-202. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2020.1774906. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1080/09273948.2020.1774906
PMID:32779952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7876156/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Sub-analysis of the FAST Trial comparing change in CD4 (∆CD4) from baseline through 12 months in uveitis patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to 1.5 g twice daily MMF or 25 mg weekly MTX. Individuals with CD4 counts at baseline, 6 months (or treatment failure prior), and 12 months (or treatment failure between 6 and 12 months) were included. The association between treatment and ∆CD4 (cells/μL) was analyzed using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in ∆CD4 between MMF and MTX at 6 months (-31.7 cells/μL for MMF compared to MTX; 95% CI: -358.2 to 294.8, = .85) and 12 months (-78.3 cells/μL for MMF compared to MTX; 95% CI: -468.0 to 311.3; = .69).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in ∆CD4 between MMF and MTX from baseline to 12 months, suggesting that MMF does not confer additional risk of CD4 lymphopenia in uveitic patients.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829295.

摘要

目的

对 FAST 试验的亚组分析比较了接受吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗的葡萄膜炎患者从基线到 12 个月时 CD4 变化(∆CD4)。

方法

患者被随机分配到 1.5g 每日两次 MMF 或 25mg 每周 MTX。纳入了基线、6 个月(或治疗失败前)和 12 个月(或 6 至 12 个月之间治疗失败)时 CD4 计数的个体。使用多变量线性回归分析治疗与 ∆CD4(细胞/μL)之间的关联。

结果

在 6 个月时,MMF 和 MTX 之间的 ∆CD4 没有显著差异(MMF 与 MTX 相比为-31.7 细胞/μL;95%CI:-358.2 至 294.8, = 0.85)和 12 个月时(MMF 与 MTX 相比为-78.3 细胞/μL;95%CI:-468.0 至 311.3; = 0.69)。

结论

从基线到 12 个月,MMF 和 MTX 之间的 ∆CD4 没有显著差异,这表明 MMF 不会给葡萄膜炎患者带来 CD4 淋巴细胞减少的额外风险。

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01829295。

相似文献

1
Comparison of CD4 Counts with Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Methotrexate from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial.一线免疫抑制剂(FAST)治疗中霉酚酸酯与甲氨蝶呤作为激素节省治疗的 CD4 计数比较。
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2022 Jan 2;30(1):198-202. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2020.1774906. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Outcomes in Patients With Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease From the First-Line Antimetabolites for Steroid-Sparing Treatment Uveitis Trial.一线抗代谢药物治疗葡萄膜炎试验中 Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada 病患者的结局。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov;267:100-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.06.004. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
3
Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.吗替麦考酚酯与甲氨蝶呤治疗葡萄膜炎患者的激素撤药作用:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 10;322(10):936-945. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12618.
4
Outcomes of Uveitic Macular Edema in the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-Sparing Treatment Uveitis Trial.《一线抗代谢药物作为类固醇保眼治疗葡萄膜炎试验中的葡萄膜炎性黄斑水肿结局》。
Ophthalmology. 2022 Jun;129(6):661-667. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Reduced Dose Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Noninfectious Uveitis: A Sub-Analysis from the First-Line Antimetabolites as Steroid Sparing Therapy (FAST) Trial.低剂量甲氨蝶呤和霉酚酸酯在非感染性葡萄膜炎中的应用:一线抗代谢药物作为类固醇节约疗法(FAST)试验的亚分析。
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2024 Aug;32(6):955-960. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2023.2165949. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
6
Risk of failing both methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial.一线抗代谢物作为类固醇替代治疗(FAST)葡萄膜炎试验中,甲氨蝶呤和霉酚酸酯均治疗失败的风险。
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2023 Jun 9;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12348-023-00350-5.
7
Comparison Between Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil Monotherapy for the Control of Noninfectious Ocular Inflammatory Diseases.甲氨蝶呤与吗替麦考酚酯单药治疗非感染性眼部炎症性疾病的疗效比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
8
A randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious uveitis.一项比较甲氨蝶呤和霉酚酸酯治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎的随机临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Oct;121(10):1863-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.023. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
9
Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and methotrexate usage in paediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A systematic literature review.霉酚酸酯、硫唑嘌呤和甲氨蝶呤在儿科抗 NMDAR 脑炎中的应用:系统文献回顾。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2019 Jan;23(1):7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Mycophenolate versus Methotrexate in Non-infectious Ocular Inflammatory Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.霉酚酸酯与甲氨蝶呤治疗非感染性眼部炎症性疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2023 Apr;31(3):613-620. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2034166. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Disseminated Complex Infection in a Patient Treated With Immunosuppressants.接受免疫抑制剂治疗患者的播散性复杂感染
ACG Case Rep J. 2023 Apr 19;10(4):e01033. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001033. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Non-biologic, steroid-sparing therapies for non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults.成人非感染性中间、后和全葡萄膜炎的非生物制剂、皮质类固醇保留疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 31;10(10):CD014831. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014831.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between lymphocyte subsets and cytomegalovirus infection status among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A pilot study.系统性红斑狼疮患者淋巴细胞亚群与巨细胞病毒感染状态的相关性:一项初步研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e16997. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016997.
2
Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.吗替麦考酚酯与甲氨蝶呤治疗葡萄膜炎患者的激素撤药作用:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 10;322(10):936-945. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12618.
3
The Abnormal CD4+T Lymphocyte Subset Distribution and Vbeta Repertoire in New-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis Can Be Modulated by Methotrexate Treament.初发类风湿关节炎患者异常 CD4+T 淋巴细胞亚群分布和 Vβ repertoire 可被甲氨蝶呤治疗所调节。
Cells. 2019 Aug 10;8(8):871. doi: 10.3390/cells8080871.
4
Genetic Variants Associated With Immunosuppressant Pharmacokinetics and Adverse Effects in the DeKAF Genomics Genome-wide Association Studies.与免疫抑制剂药代动力学和不良反应相关的遗传变异在 DeKAF 基因组全基因组关联研究中的分析。
Transplantation. 2019 Jun;103(6):1131-1139. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002625.
5
CD4:CD8 ratio comparison between cohorts of HIV-positive Asians and Caucasians upon commencement of antiretroviral therapy.开始抗逆转录病毒治疗时,HIV 阳性亚洲人和高加索人队列之间的 CD4:CD8 比值比较。
Antivir Ther. 2017;22(8):659-668. doi: 10.3851/IMP3155.
6
Pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with inflammatory or autoimmune diseases: Usefulness of lymphocyte subtyping.炎症性或自身免疫性疾病患者的肺孢子菌肺炎:淋巴细胞亚群分型的作用
Int J Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;57:108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
CD4 Count Recovery After Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Patients Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者开始抗逆转录病毒治疗后的CD4细胞计数恢复情况
Am J Med Sci. 2016 Sep;352(3):239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
8
Long-term study of the impact of methotrexate on serum cytokines and lymphocyte subsets in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: correlation with pharmacokinetic measures.长期研究甲氨蝶呤对活动期类风湿关节炎患者血清细胞因子和淋巴细胞亚群的影响:与药代动力学指标的相关性。
RMD Open. 2016 Jun 9;2(1):e000287. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000287. eCollection 2016.
9
Lymphopenia as a predictor of sarcoidosis in patients with uveitis.淋巴细胞减少作为葡萄膜炎患者结节病的预测指标。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;100(10):1393-6. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307455. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
10
Mycophenolic acid versus azathioprine as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients.霉酚酸与硫唑嘌呤作为肾移植受者的初始免疫抑制治疗比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 3;2015(12):CD007746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007746.pub2.