Stone P H, Raabe D S, Jaffe A S, Gustafson N, Muller J E, Turi Z G, Rutherford J D, Poole W K, Passamani E, Willerson J T
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Mar;11(3):453-63. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)91517-3.
To determine the relative prognostic significance of location (anterior or inferior) and type (Q wave or non-Q wave) of infarction, the hospital course and follow-up outcome (mean duration 30.8 months) of 471 patients with a first infarction were analyzed. Analyses were performed grouping the patients according to infarct location (anterior, n = 253; inferior, n = 218), infarct type (Q wave, n = 323; non-Q wave, n = 148), and both location and type (inferior non-Q wave, n = 85; inferior Q wave, n = 133; anterior non-Q wave, n = 63; and anterior Q wave, n = 190). Patients with anterior infarction had a substantially worse in-hospital and follow-up clinical course compared with those with inferior infarction, evidenced by a larger infarct size (21.2 versus 14.9 g Eq/m2 creatine kinase, MB fraction [MB CK], p less than 0.001), lower admission left ventricular ejection fraction (38.1 versus 55.3%, p less than 0.001) and higher incidence of heart failure (40.7 versus 14.7%, p less than 0.001), serious ventricular ectopic activity (70.2 versus 58.9%, p less than 0.05), in-hospital death (11.9 versus 2.8%, p less than 0.001) and total cumulative cardiac mortality (27 versus 11%, p less than 0.001). Patients with Q wave infarction similarly experienced a worse in-hospital course compared with patients with non-Q wave infarction, evidenced by a larger infarct size (20.7 versus 12.7 MB CK g Eq/m2, p less than 0.001), lower admission left ventricular ejection fraction (43.7 versus 50.6%, p less than 0.001), and a higher incidence of heart failure (31.9 versus 21.6%, p less than 0.05) and in-hospital death (9.3 versus 4.1% p less than 0.05). However, there was no increased rate of reinfarction or mortality in hospital survivors with non-Q wave infarction compared with those with Q wave infarction, and total cardiac mortality was similar (16 versus 21%, p = NS). To evaluate the role of infarct location and type independent of infarct size, patients were grouped according to quartile of infarct size, and outcome was reanalyzed within each group. Patients with anterior infarction demonstrated a lower left ventricular ejection fraction on admission and after 10 days than did patients with inferior infarction, even after adjustment for infarct size, as well as a higher incidence of congestive heart failure and cumulative cardiac mortality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
为了确定梗死部位(前壁或下壁)和类型(Q波或非Q波)的相对预后意义,分析了471例首次发生心肌梗死患者的住院病程及随访结果(平均时长30.8个月)。根据梗死部位(前壁,n = 253;下壁,n = 218)、梗死类型(Q波,n = 323;非Q波,n = 148)以及部位和类型两者(下壁非Q波,n = 85;下壁Q波,n = 133;前壁非Q波,n = 63;前壁Q波,n = 190)对患者进行分组分析。与下壁梗死患者相比,前壁梗死患者的住院及随访临床病程明显更差,表现为梗死面积更大(肌酸激酶MB同工酶[MB CK],21.2比14.9 g Eq/m2,p<0.001)、入院时左心室射血分数更低(38.1%比55.3%,p<0.001)、心力衰竭发生率更高(40.7%比14.7%,p<0.001)、严重室性异位活动发生率更高(70.2%比58.9%,p<0.05)、住院死亡率更高(11.9%比2.8%,p<0.001)以及总累积心脏死亡率更高(27%比11%,p<0.001)。与非Q波梗死患者相比,Q波梗死患者同样经历了更差的住院病程,表现为梗死面积更大(20.7比12.7 MB CK g Eq/m2,p<0.001)、入院时左心室射血分数更低(43.7%比50.6%,p<0.001)、心力衰竭发生率更高(31.9%比21.6%,p<0.05)以及住院死亡率更高(9.3%比4.1%,p<0.05)。然而,与Q波梗死患者相比,非Q波梗死的住院存活者再梗死率或死亡率并未增加,且总心脏死亡率相似(16%比21%,p无显著性差异)。为了评估独立于梗死面积的梗死部位和类型的作用,根据梗死面积四分位数对患者进行分组,并在每组内重新分析结果。即使在调整梗死面积后,前壁梗死患者入院时及10天后的左心室射血分数仍低于下壁梗死患者,且充血性心力衰竭发生率及累积心脏死亡率更高。(摘要截选至400词)