Patel J J, Gartell P C, Guyer P B, Herbert A, Taylor I
University Surgical Unit, University of Southampton.
J R Soc Med. 1988 Jan;81(1):10-2. doi: 10.1177/014107688808100106.
A prospective randomized controlled trial of 116 patients with breast masses was conducted to compare the accuracy of 'blind' aspiration cytology performed in the clinic with aspiration cytology using ultrasound localization. The unsatisfactory aspiration cytology rate was significantly reduced by ultrasound localization (P = 0.028). This was mainly due to an improvement in the unsatisfactory rate for tumours less than 3 cm in diameter (P = 0.036). The results were influenced by the number of needle manoeuvres performed, less than 10 needle manoeuvres being associated with a 54% unsatisfactory aspiration rate compared with 25% when greater than 10 manoeuvres were performed (P = less than 0.02). One experienced aspirator in the clinic had results comparable to those achieved with ultrasound localization. It is concluded that experience and technique are the most important factors in obtaining a satisfactory aspirate from breast masses. Routine ultrasound localization prior to aspiration confers some benefit. Consideration should be given to the use of the ultrasound-assisted technique following a previous unsatisfactory aspiration, particularly if the tumour is less than 3 cm in diameter.
对116例乳腺肿块患者进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,以比较临床进行的“盲法”穿刺细胞学检查与超声定位下穿刺细胞学检查的准确性。超声定位显著降低了不满意穿刺细胞学检查率(P = 0.028)。这主要是由于直径小于3 cm的肿瘤不满意率有所改善(P = 0.036)。结果受穿刺操作次数的影响,穿刺操作次数少于10次时不满意穿刺率为54%,而操作次数大于10次时为25%(P<0.02)。临床一位经验丰富的穿刺者的结果与超声定位的结果相当。得出的结论是,经验和技术是从乳腺肿块获得满意穿刺样本的最重要因素。穿刺前常规超声定位有一定益处。对于先前穿刺不满意的情况,应考虑使用超声辅助技术,尤其是当肿瘤直径小于3 cm时。