INSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, INSERM U1116, Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, F-CRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Department of cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heart Fail Rev. 2021 Jan;26(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-10004-6.
Treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with currently available therapies reduces morbidity and mortality. However, implementation of these therapies is a problem with only few patients achieving guideline-recommended maximal doses of therapy. In an effort to improve guideline adherence and uptitration, several trials have investigated a biomarker-guided strategy (using natriuretic peptide targets in specific), but although conceptually promising, these trials failed to show a consistent beneficial effect on outcomes. In this review, we discuss different methodological issues that may explain the failure of these trials and offer potential solutions. Moreover, alternative approaches to increase heart failure guideline adherence are evaluated.
目前可用的治疗心力衰竭射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的方法可降低发病率和死亡率。然而,这些治疗方法的实施存在问题,只有少数患者达到了指南推荐的最大治疗剂量。为了提高指南的依从性和剂量调整,几项试验研究了一种基于生物标志物的策略(使用特定的利钠肽靶标),但尽管从概念上讲很有前景,但这些试验未能显示对结局有一致的有益影响。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了可能解释这些试验失败的不同方法学问题,并提出了潜在的解决方案。此外,还评估了增加心力衰竭指南依从性的替代方法。