• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的心力衰竭药物治疗的处方模式和 ASIAN-HF 注册研究的结果:一项队列研究。

Prescribing patterns of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy and outcomes in the ASIAN-HF registry: a cohort study.

机构信息

National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.

National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1008-e1018. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30306-1.

DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30306-1
PMID:30103979
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), β blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are of proven benefit and are recommended by guidelines for management of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to examine the first prospective multinational data from Asia on prescribing patterns of guideline-directed medical therapies and analyse its effect on outcomes.

METHODS

In the prospective multinational ASIAN-HF registry (with enrolment from 46 centres in 11 countries in Asia), we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older, with symptomatic heart failure (stage C, with at least one episode of decompensated heart failure in the past 6 months that resulted in admission to hospital or was treated in an outpatient clinic) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤40% on baseline echocardiography, consistent with 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines). We excluded patients with heart failure caused by severe valvular heart disease, life-threatening comorbidity with a life expectancy of less than 1 year, who were unable or unwilling to give consent, or who had concurrent participation in a clinical trial. Patients were followed up for 3 years for the outcomes of death and cause-specific admittance to hospital. Primary outcomes were uptake of guideline-directed medical therapies (as proportions) by therapeutic class, achieved doses as proportions of guideline-recommended doses, and their association with 1-year composite outcome of all-cause death or admittance to hospital because of heart failure. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01633398.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2015, we enrolled 5276 patients with HFrEF (mean age 59·6 years [SD 13·2], 77% men, body-mass index 24·9 kg/m [5·1], 33% New York Heart Association class III or IV). Follow-up data were available for 4544 (90%) of 5061 eligible patients taking medication for heart failure, with median follow-up of 417 days (IQR 214-735). ACE inhibitors or ARBs were prescribed to 3868 (77%) of 5005 patients, β blockers to 3975 (79%) of 5061, and MRAs to 2998 (58%) of 5205, with substantial regional variation. Guideline-recommended dose was achieved in only 17% of cases for ACE inhibitors or ARB, 13% for β blockers, and 29% for MRAs. Country (all three drug classes), increasing body-mass index (ACE inhibitors or ARBs and MRAs), and in-patient recruitment (ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers) were associated with attainment of guideline-recommended dose (all p<0·05). When adjusted for indication bias, increasing drug doses, from low dose (1-<25% of guideline-recommended dose) upwards were associated with lower hazards of a 1-year composite outcome for ACE inhibitors or ARBs and β blockers compared with non-users. The lowest adjusted hazards were in the group that attained guideline-recommended doses above 50% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·54, 95% CI 0·50-0·58 for ACE inhibitors or ARBs [50-99·9%]; HR 0·47, 0·46-0·50 for β blockers, and HR 0·77, 0·72-0·81 for MRAs [≥100%]).

INTERPRETATION

Guideline-directed medical therapies at recommended doses are underutilised in patients with HFrEF. Improved uptake and uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapies are needed for better patient outcomes.

FUNDING

National Medical Research Council (Singapore), A*STAR Biomedical Research Council ATTRaCT program, Boston Scientific Investigator Sponsored Research program, and Bayer.

摘要

背景

血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)、β受体阻滞剂和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)已被证明具有益处,并且被心力衰竭和射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者管理指南推荐。我们旨在研究亚洲首个来自亚洲的前瞻性多国数据,了解指南指导的药物治疗方案的处方模式,并分析其对结局的影响。

方法

在这项前瞻性多国亚洲心力衰竭注册研究(在亚洲 11 个国家的 46 个中心进行招募)中,我们招募了年龄在 18 岁及以上、有症状性心力衰竭(C 期,过去 6 个月至少有一次失代偿性心力衰竭发作,导致住院或在门诊治疗)和左心室收缩功能障碍(基线超声心动图射血分数≤40%,符合 2016 年欧洲心脏病学会指南)的患者。我们排除了因严重瓣膜性心脏病、有预期寿命不到 1 年的危及生命的合并症、无法或不愿同意、或同时参加临床试验而导致的心力衰竭患者。患者在 3 年内接受死亡和因心力衰竭特定原因住院的结局随访。主要结局是按治疗类别报告指南指导的药物治疗的使用率(作为比例)、达到指南推荐剂量的比例以及它们与所有原因死亡或因心力衰竭住院的 1 年复合结局的相关性。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01633398。

结果

在 2012 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间,我们招募了 5276 例 HFrEF 患者(平均年龄 59.6 岁[标准差 13.2],77%为男性,体重指数 24.9kg/m[5.1],33%为纽约心脏协会心功能分级 III 或 IV 级)。我们获得了 5061 名有心力衰竭用药记录的合格患者中 4544 名(90%)的随访数据,中位随访时间为 417 天(IQR 214-735)。5005 例患者中有 3868 例(77%)使用 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB,5061 例中有 3975 例(79%)使用β受体阻滞剂,5205 例中有 2998 例(58%)使用 MRA,存在显著的区域差异。ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 的推荐剂量仅在 17%的病例中达到,β受体阻滞剂为 13%,MRA 为 29%。国家(所有三种药物类别)、体重指数增加(ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 和 MRA)和住院招募(ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 和β受体阻滞剂)与达到指南推荐剂量相关(所有 p<0.05)。在调整适应证偏倚后,与未使用者相比,从低剂量(ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 和 MRA 的 1-<25%推荐剂量)增加药物剂量与 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 和β受体阻滞剂的 1 年复合结局风险降低相关。最低的调整风险是达到指南推荐剂量 50%以上的组(ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 的危险比[HR]为 0.54,95%CI 为 0.50-0.58[50-99.9%];β受体阻滞剂为 0.47,0.46-0.50;MRA 为 0.77,0.72-0.81[≥100%])。

解释

在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中,指南指导的药物治疗方案在推荐剂量下的使用率较低。需要提高和增加指南指导的药物治疗方案的使用率,以改善患者的结局。

资金

新加坡国家医学研究委员会、A*STAR 生物医学研究理事会 ATTRaCT 计划、波士顿科学公司研究者发起的研究计划和拜耳公司。

相似文献

1
Prescribing patterns of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy and outcomes in the ASIAN-HF registry: a cohort study.基于证据的心力衰竭药物治疗的处方模式和 ASIAN-HF 注册研究的结果:一项队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1008-e1018. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30306-1.
2
The treatment gap in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: a systematic review of evidence-based prescribing in practice.慢性收缩性心力衰竭患者的治疗差距:对实践中循证用药的系统评价。
Heart Fail Rev. 2016 Nov;21(6):675-697. doi: 10.1007/s10741-016-9575-2.
3
Physicians' guideline adherence is associated with better prognosis in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the QUALIFY international registry.医生的指南遵循与射血分数降低的心力衰竭门诊患者的更好预后相关:QUALIFY 国际注册研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1414-1423. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.887. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
4
Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study.比较男性和女性心力衰竭药物的最佳剂量:一项前瞻性、观察性、队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1254-1263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-1. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
5
Contemporary Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Comorbid Diabetes Mellitus and HFrEF: The CHAMP-HF Registry.合并糖尿病与射血分数降低心衰(HFrEF)患者的当代治疗模式与临床结局:CHAMP-HF 注册研究。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;8(6):469-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.12.015. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Impact of Individual Patient Profiles on Adherence to Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: VCOR-HF Study.个体患者特征对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者遵医嘱治疗的影响:VCOR-HF 研究。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Dec;29(12):1782-1789. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
General practitioners' adherence to chronic heart failure guidelines regarding medication: the GP-HF study.全科医生对慢性心力衰竭药物治疗指南的遵循情况:全科医生-心力衰竭研究
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 May;105(5):441-50. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0939-8. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
8
Gap between guidelines and clinical practice in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Results from TSOC-HFrEF registry.射血分数降低的心力衰竭指南与临床实践之间的差距:来自 TSOC-HFrEF 注册研究的结果。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2017 Dec;80(12):750-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
9
Pharmacotherapy Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Health Resource Utilization Among Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction at a U.S. Academic Medical Center.美国一家学术医疗中心射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的药物治疗模式、治疗结果及卫生资源利用情况
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Feb;36(2):174-86. doi: 10.1002/phar.1701. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Adherence to Treatment Guidelines in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction in a Latin-American Country: Observational Study of the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).在拉丁美洲国家,射血分数降低的门诊心力衰竭患者对治疗指南的依从性:哥伦比亚心力衰竭注册研究(RECOLFACA)的观察性研究。
Cardiology. 2024;149(3):228-236. doi: 10.1159/000535916. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
In-hospital Utilization and Dose Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies among Acute Heart Failure Yemeni Patients.也门急性心力衰竭患者指南指导下药物治疗的院内使用情况及剂量优化
Heart Views. 2025 Jan-Mar;26(1):7-18. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_152_24. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Early Initiation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Improves Outcomes in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients without Significant Risk of Nephrotoxicity.早期启动指南导向的药物治疗可改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的预后,且这些患者无显著肾毒性风险。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2025 Jul;41(4):510-520. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202507_41(4).20250324A.
3
Comprehensive Introduction to ASIAN-HF Registry.
亚洲心力衰竭注册研究综合介绍
JACC Asia. 2025 Sep;5(9):1206-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.05.020. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
4
Care That Fits: Optimizing Value-Based Care for Acute Kidney Injury Survivors.量身定制的护理:优化急性肾损伤幸存者的价值导向型护理
Adv Kidney Dis Health. 2025 Mar;32(2):133-143. doi: 10.1053/j.akdh.2024.10.010.
5
Assessing the application of American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.评估美国心脏协会(AHA)指南在射血分数降低的心力衰竭管理中的应用。
Egypt Heart J. 2025 Mar 10;77(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s43044-025-00629-z.
6
A STRONG call for intensive oral heart failure therapy in acute heart failure patients.对急性心力衰竭患者进行强化口服心力衰竭治疗的强烈呼吁。
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 May;30(3):537-543. doi: 10.1007/s10741-025-10486-2. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
7
Initiation and sequencing of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum.射血分数范围内心力衰竭的指南指导药物治疗的启动与序贯治疗
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 May;30(3):515-523. doi: 10.1007/s10741-025-10481-7. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
8
Heart Failure Beyond the Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Patients' Perspectives on Daily Life and Challenges.心力衰竭诊断之外:关于患者对日常生活及挑战看法的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 29;13(23):7278. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237278.
9
Current and Future of Heart Failure Care in Asia.亚洲心力衰竭护理的现状与未来。
Int J Heart Fail. 2024 Oct 25;6(4):141-148. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2024.0033. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Use of Guideline-Recommended Heart Failure Drugs in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高、中、低收入国家中指南推荐的心力衰竭药物的使用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Glob Heart. 2024 Sep 12;19(1):74. doi: 10.5334/gh.1355. eCollection 2024.