IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Dec;23(16):1387-1394. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1805441. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
Considering that optimal contact area and pressure at the tendon-bone interface are associated with better footprint repair and outcomes, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of standard double-row, transosseous equivalent (TOE), and partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) techniques for the treatment of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon using 3D finite element models. Loading consisted, alternately, in a preloading of 10 N and 20 N of the sutures. The footprint coverage of the standard double-row, TOE, and PASTA techniques was estimated to represent 19%, 30%, and 35%, respectively, of the repair area. The average contact pressures followed an opposite trend, i.e., the largest was estimated for the standard double-row technique, whereas the lowest was estimated for the PASTA technique. Despite the present study advancing the computational modelling of rotator cuff repair, and the results being consistent with the literature, its findings must be evaluated cautiously, bearing in mind its limitations.
考虑到肌腱-骨界面的最佳接触面积和压力与更好的足印修复和结果相关,本研究旨在使用 3D 有限元模型比较标准双排、经骨等效(TOE)和部分关节上肩袖肌腱撕脱(PASTA)技术治疗全层肩袖撕裂的性能。加载方式为交替施加 10N 和 20N 的缝线预载。标准双排、TOE 和 PASTA 技术的足印覆盖率分别估计为修复区域的 19%、30%和 35%。平均接触压力则呈现相反的趋势,即标准双排技术的平均接触压力最大,而 PASTA 技术的平均接触压力最小。尽管本研究推进了肩袖修复的计算建模,并且结果与文献一致,但必须谨慎评估其发现,同时考虑到其局限性。