Suppr超能文献

实时连续血糖监测在 1 型糖尿病中的作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Diabetology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.

University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Diabetol. 2021 Apr;58(4):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01589-3. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

Abstract

AIMS

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) represented a major breakthrough in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to assess the effect of continues glucose monitoring (CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM), on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present analysis includes randomized clinical trials comparing CGM or FGM with SMBG, with a duration of at least 12 weeks, identified in Medline or clinicaltrials.gov. The principal endpoint was HbA1c at the end of the trial. A secondary endpoint was severe hypoglycemia. Mean and 95% confidence intervals for HbA1c and Mantel-Haenzel odds ratio [MH-OR] for severe hypoglycemia were calculated, using random effect models. A sensitivity analysis was performed using fixed effect models. In addition, the following secondary endpoints were explored, using the same methods: time in range, health-related quality of life, and treatment satisfaction. Separate analyses were performed for trials comparing CGM with SMBG, and those comparing CGM + CSII and SMBG + MDI and CGM-regulated insulin infusion system (CRIS) and CSII + SMBG.

RESULTS

CGM was associated with a significantly lower HbA1c at endpoint in comparison with SMBG (- 0.24 [- 0.34, - 0.13]%); CGM was associated with a significantly lower risk of severe hypoglycemia than SMBG. Treatment satisfaction and quality of life were not measured, or not reported, in the majority of studies. FGM showed a significant reduction in the incidence of mild hypoglycemia and an increased treatment satisfaction, but no significant results are shown in HbA1c. CGM + CSII in comparison with SMBG + MDI was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c. Only two trials with a duration of at least 12 weeks compared a CRIS with SMBG + CSII; HbA1c between the two treatment arms was not statistically significant (difference in means: - 0.23 [- 0.91; 0.46]%; p = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

GCM compared to SMBG has showed a reduction in HbA1c and severe hypoglycemia in patient with type 1 diabetes. The comparison between CGM + CSII and SMBG + MDI showed a large reduction in HbA1c; it is conceivable that the effects of CSII + CGM on glycemic control additives. The only comparison available between FGM and SMBG was conducted in patients in good control.

摘要

目的

自我血糖监测(SMBG)在 1 型糖尿病治疗中是一项重大突破。本荟萃分析的目的是评估连续血糖监测(CGM)和瞬感血糖监测(FGM)对 1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。

材料和方法

本分析纳入了在 Medline 或 clinicaltrials.gov 中检索到的比较 CGM 或 FGM 与 SMBG、持续时间至少 12 周的随机临床试验。主要终点是试验结束时的 HbA1c。次要终点是严重低血糖。使用随机效应模型计算 HbA1c 的均数和 95%置信区间(95%CI)和严重低血糖的 Mantel-Haenzel 比值比(MH-OR)。使用固定效应模型进行了敏感性分析。此外,使用相同的方法探索了以下次要终点:达标时间、健康相关生活质量和治疗满意度。分别对 CGM 与 SMBG 比较的试验和 CGM+CSII 与 SMBG+MDI 比较的试验以及 CGM 调节胰岛素输注系统(CRIS)与 CSII+SMBG 比较的试验进行了分析。

结果

与 SMBG 相比,CGM 治疗终点时的 HbA1c 显著降低(-0.24[-0.34,-0.13]%);CGM 与 SMBG 相比,严重低血糖的风险显著降低。大多数研究未测量或未报告治疗满意度和生活质量。FGM 显示轻度低血糖发生率降低和治疗满意度增加,但 HbA1c 未显示显著结果。CGM+CSII 与 SMBG+MDI 比较,HbA1c 显著降低。只有两项持续时间至少 12 周的试验比较了 CRIS 与 SMBG+CSII;两种治疗组之间的 HbA1c 无统计学意义(均数差异:-0.23[-0.91;0.46]%;p=0.52)。

结论

与 SMBG 相比,CGM 可降低 1 型糖尿病患者的 HbA1c 和严重低血糖。CGM+CSII 与 SMBG+MDI 比较显示 HbA1c 显著降低;可以想象 CSII+CGM 对血糖控制的附加作用。FGM 与 SMBG 之间唯一可用的比较是在血糖控制良好的患者中进行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验