Suppr超能文献

一项系统评价评估切口负压伤口治疗对瘢痕形成的影响。

A systematic review evaluating the influence of incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on scarring.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Hand Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2021 Jan;29(1):8-19. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12858. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

Abstract

Pathological scars can result in functional impairment, disfigurement, a psychological burden, itch, and even chronic pain. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the influence of incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (iNPWT) on scarring. PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for preclinical and clinical comparative studies that investigated the influence of iNPWT on scarring-related outcomes. Individual studies were assessed using the OHAT Risk of Bias Rating Tool for Human and Animal studies. The body of evidence was rated using OHAT methodology. Six preclinical studies and nine clinical studies (377 patients) were identified. Preclinical studies suggested that iNPWT reduced lateral tension on incisions, increased wound strength, and reduced scar width upon histological assessment. Two clinical studies reported improved patient-reported scar satisfaction as measured with the PSAS (1 year after surgery), POSAS, and a VAS (both 42, 90, and 180 days after surgery). Five clinical studies reported improved observer-reported scar satisfaction as measured with the VSS, SBSES, OSAS, MSS, VAS, and POSAS (7, 15, 30, 42, 90, 180, and 365 days after surgery). Three clinical studies did not detect significant differences at any point in time (POSAS, VAS, and NRS). Because of imprecision concerns, a moderate level of evidence was identified using OHAT methodology. Preclinical as well as clinical evidence indicates a beneficial influence of iNPWT on scarring. Moderate level evidence indicates that iNPWT decreases scar width and improves patient and observer-reported scar satisfaction.

摘要

病理性瘢痕可导致功能障碍、毁容、心理负担、瘙痒,甚至慢性疼痛。我们进行了一项系统评价,以调查切口负压伤口治疗(iNPWT)对瘢痕形成的影响。检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 中的临床前和临床对照研究,以调查 iNPWT 对瘢痕相关结局的影响。使用 OHAT 人类和动物研究风险偏倚评估工具评估个别研究。使用 OHAT 方法学对证据体进行评级。确定了 6 项临床前研究和 9 项临床研究(377 例患者)。临床前研究表明,iNPWT 减少了切口的侧向张力,增加了伤口强度,并减少了组织学评估时的瘢痕宽度。两项临床研究报告称,患者报告的瘢痕满意度(手术后 1 年用 PSAS、POSAS 和 VAS 评估)得到改善。5 项临床研究报告称,观察者报告的瘢痕满意度(手术后 7、15、30、42、90、180 和 365 天用 VSS、SBSES、OSAS、MSS、VAS 和 POSAS 评估)得到改善。3 项临床研究在任何时间点均未发现差异(POSAS、VAS 和 NRS)。由于存在不精确性问题,使用 OHAT 方法学确定了中等水平的证据。临床前和临床证据表明 iNPWT 对瘢痕形成有有益的影响。中度证据表明 iNPWT 可减少瘢痕宽度并改善患者和观察者报告的瘢痕满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ce8/7891404/edfcb3845309/WRR-29-8-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验