Zheng Ting, Ye Peng, Wu Weilan, Hu Bin, Chen Lifei, Zheng Xiaochun, Lin Mingxue
Department of Anaesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jul;8(14):861. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3805.
Despite the many advantages real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar anesthesia has over traditional lumbar anesthesia, it seemingly involves a much higher dose of ropivacaine. This study aimed to determine the minimum local anesthetic dose (MLAD) and the 95% confidence interval of ropivacaine at different concentrations in real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar anesthesia for lower extremity surgery.
A total of 60 patients who were consecutively scheduled for selective lower extremity surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, which each received different concentrations of ropivacaine at different initial dosages when Dixon's up-and-down sequential method was applied. The high ropivacaine group and the low ropivacaine group received 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine, respectively. The patients' baseline characteristics, the MLAD, and the 95% confidence interval were assessed. The highest level of sensory block, time to reach the T10 sensory block, duration for sensory blocks higher than T10, highest plane for sensory block, and onset time and duration for motor block were recorded. Comparisons were also made between the patients' vital signs and adverse reactions.
The minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) and 95% confidence interval in the high ropivacaine group and the low ropivacaine group were 17.176 (16.276 to 18.124) and 20.192 (19.256 to 21.174) mg, respectively. Moreover, motor block maintenance was greatly reduced in the 0.5% ropivacaine compared to the 0.75% ropivacaine group (P=0.0309).
In real-time ultrasound-guided intraspinal anesthesia for lower extremity surgery, both 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine provide satisfactory anesthesia. Our results suggest that shortened motor block duration can hold benefits for patients including earlier mobilization and a quicker rehabilitation process.
尽管实时超声引导下的腰麻比传统腰麻有许多优势,但它似乎需要更高剂量的罗哌卡因。本研究旨在确定实时超声引导下下肢手术腰麻中不同浓度罗哌卡因的最低局部麻醉剂量(MLAD)及95%置信区间。
共纳入60例择期行下肢手术的患者。采用Dixon上下序贯法时,将患者随机分为两组,每组接受不同初始剂量的不同浓度罗哌卡因。高浓度罗哌卡因组和低浓度罗哌卡因组分别接受0.75%和0.5%的罗哌卡因。评估患者的基线特征、MLAD及95%置信区间。记录感觉阻滞的最高平面、达到T10感觉阻滞的时间、高于T10感觉阻滞的持续时间、感觉阻滞的最高平面以及运动阻滞的起效时间和持续时间。还对患者的生命体征和不良反应进行了比较。
高浓度罗哌卡因组和低浓度罗哌卡因组的最低局部麻醉剂量(MLAD)及95%置信区间分别为17.176(16.276至18.124)mg和20.192(19.256至21.174)mg。此外,与0.75%罗哌卡因组相比,0.5%罗哌卡因组的运动阻滞维持时间显著缩短(P = 0.0309)。
在实时超声引导下的下肢手术椎管内麻醉中,0.75%和0.5%的罗哌卡因均可提供满意的麻醉效果。我们的结果表明,缩短运动阻滞持续时间对患者有益,包括更早活动和更快的康复进程。