• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的德尔塔检查规则制定方法。

Evidence-based approach to setting delta check rules.

机构信息

Metabolic Laboratory, Genetics and Molecular Pathology Directorate, SA Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital Site, Adelaide, Australia.

Engineering Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Jan;58(1):49-59. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2020.1800585. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1080/10408363.2020.1800585
PMID:32795201
Abstract

Delta checks are a post-analytical verification tool that compare the difference in sequential laboratory results belonging to the same patient against a predefined limit. This unique quality tool highlights a potential error at the individual patient level. A difference in sequential laboratory results that exceeds the predefined limit is considered likely to contain an error that requires further investigation that can be time and resource intensive. This may cause a delay in the provision of the result to the healthcare provider or entail recollection of the patient sample. Delta checks have been used primarily to detect sample misidentification (sample mix-up, wrong blood in tube), and recent advancements in laboratory medicine, including the adoption of protocolized procedures, information technology and automation in the total testing process, have significantly reduced the prevalence of such errors. As such, delta check rules need to be selected carefully to balance the clinical risk of these errors and the need to maintain operational efficiency. Historically, delta check rules have been set by professional opinion based on reference change values (biological variation) or the published literature. Delta check rules implemented in this manner may not inform laboratory practitioners of their real-world performance. This review discusses several evidence-based approaches to the optimal setting of delta check rules that directly inform the laboratory practitioner of the error detection capabilities of the selected rules. Subsequent verification of workflow for the selected delta check rules is also discussed. This review is intended to provide practical assistance to laboratories in setting evidence-based delta check rules that best suits their local operational and clinical needs.

摘要

Delta 检查是一种分析后验证工具,用于比较属于同一患者的连续实验室结果之间的差异与预设限制。这种独特的质量工具突出了个体患者层面的潜在错误。如果连续实验室结果的差异超过预设限制,则认为可能包含需要进一步调查的错误,这可能既耗时又耗费资源。这可能会导致结果延迟提供给医疗保健提供者,或者需要召回患者样本。Delta 检查主要用于检测样本错误识别(样本混淆、管内错误血液),而最近实验室医学的进展,包括在整个测试过程中采用标准化程序、信息技术和自动化,大大降低了此类错误的发生率。因此,需要仔细选择 Delta 检查规则,以平衡这些错误的临床风险和保持运营效率的需求。从历史上看,Delta 检查规则是根据参考变化值(生物学变异)或已发表的文献由专业意见设定的。以这种方式实施的 Delta 检查规则可能无法告知实验室人员其实践性能。本综述讨论了几种基于证据的方法,以最佳设置 Delta 检查规则,直接告知实验室人员所选规则的错误检测能力。还讨论了对所选 Delta 检查规则的工作流程进行后续验证。本综述旨在为实验室提供实用的帮助,以便根据其当地的运营和临床需求制定基于证据的 Delta 检查规则。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based approach to setting delta check rules.基于证据的德尔塔检查规则制定方法。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Jan;58(1):49-59. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2020.1800585. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
2
Delta checks.德尔塔检查。
Adv Clin Chem. 2023;115:175-203. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
3
Relationship between biological variation and delta check rules performance.生物学变异与 delta 检验规则性能的关系。
Clin Biochem. 2020 Jun;80:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
4
An approach to optimize delta checks in test panels - The effect of the number of rules included.一种优化测试面板中 delta 检查的方法——包含规则数量的影响。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2020 May;57(3):215-222. doi: 10.1177/0004563220904749. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
An approach to selecting auto-verification limits and validating their error detection performance independently for pre-analytical and analytical errors.一种针对分析前和分析误差独立选择自动验证限值并验证其错误检测性能的方法。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Sep;508:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.026. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
Optimized Delta Check Rules for Detecting Misidentified Specimens in Children.优化的 Delta 检查规则,用于检测儿童中被错误识别的样本。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Apr 15;153(5):605-612. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz201.
7
Optimization and Validation of Limit Check Error-Detection Performance Using a Laboratory-Specific Data-Simulation Approach: A Prerequisite for an Evidence-Based Practice.采用实验室特定数据模拟方法优化和验证限检错误检测性能:循证实践的前提。
J Appl Lab Med. 2022 Mar 2;7(2):467-479. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfab144.
8
Designing and evaluating autoverification rules for thyroid function profiles and sex hormone tests.设计并评估甲状腺功能指标和性激素检测的自动验证规则。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2018 Mar;55(2):254-263. doi: 10.1177/0004563217712291. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
9
Simulations of delta check rule performance to detect specimen mislabeling using historical laboratory data.使用历史实验室数据模拟德尔塔检验规则性能,以检测标本标签错误。
Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Oct 9;412(21-22):1973-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
10
Delta Checks in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室中的德尔塔检查。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Mar;56(2):75-97. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2018.1540536. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
National recommendations of the Working Group for Post-analytics of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine: implementation of autovalidation procedures.克罗地亚医学生物化学与检验医学学会分析后工作组的国家建议:自动验证程序的实施
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2025 Feb 15;35(1):010503. doi: 10.11613/BM.2025.010503.
2
An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification Limits.客观方法推导自动验证限的临床性能。
Ann Lab Med. 2022 Sep 1;42(5):597-601. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.5.597.