Headache Group-Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States . Dr. Summ is now with the Department of Neurology and Research Center of Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany . Dr. Andreou is now with the Headache Research-Wolfson CARD, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom . Dr. Akerman is now with the Department of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Headache Group, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pain. 2021 Feb 1;162(2):591-599. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002032.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, are used routinely in the treatment of primary headache disorders. Indomethacin is unique in its use in the diagnosis and treatment of hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania. The mechanism of this specific action is not fully understood, although an interaction with nitric oxide (NO) signaling pathways has been suggested. Trigeminovascular neurons were activated by dural electrical stimulation, systemic administration of an NO donor, or local microiontophoresis of L-glutamate. Using electrophysiological techniques, we subsequently recorded the activation of trigeminovascular neurons and their responses to intravenous indomethacin, naproxen, and ibuprofen. Administration of indomethacin (5 mg·kg-1), ibuprofen (30 mg·kg-1), or naproxen (30 mg·kg-1) inhibited dural-evoked firing within the trigeminocervical complex with different temporal profiles. Similarly, both indomethacin and naproxen inhibited L-glutamate-evoked cell firing suggesting a common action. By contrast, only indomethacin was able to inhibit NO-induced firing. The differences in profile of effect of indomethacin may be fundamental to its ability to treat paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua. The data implicate NO-related signaling as a potential therapeutic approach to these disorders.
非甾体抗炎药(环氧化酶抑制剂)常用于原发性头痛疾病的治疗。吲哚美辛在治疗连续性偏头痛和阵发性偏头痛方面具有独特的作用。虽然有人提出其作用机制可能与一氧化氮(NO)信号通路有关,但这一具体作用机制尚未完全阐明。电刺激硬脑膜、全身给予一氧化氮供体或局部微电泳谷氨酸均可激活三叉神经血管神经元。随后,我们使用电生理学技术记录了三叉神经血管神经元的激活及其对静脉内给予吲哚美辛、萘普生和布洛芬的反应。给予吲哚美辛(5mg·kg-1)、布洛芬(30mg·kg-1)或萘普生(30mg·kg-1)可抑制三叉颈复合体中硬脑膜诱发的放电,其时间过程不同。同样,吲哚美辛和萘普生均可抑制 L-谷氨酸诱发的细胞放电,提示存在共同作用。相比之下,只有吲哚美辛能够抑制一氧化氮诱导的放电。吲哚美辛作用模式的差异可能是其治疗阵发性偏头痛和连续性偏头痛的基础。这些数据表明,NO 相关信号可能是治疗这些疾病的一种潜在方法。