Kötter Thomas, Rose Silvia Isabelle, Götz Katja, Steinhäuser Jost
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland; Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland; Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Sep;155:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
The primary goal of medical education and training is to develop clinical competencies. Competency-based curricula exist for both medical education which - once the current reform is implemented - will be geared more towards primary care, and specialty training for General Practice. The "Allgemeinarztbarometer" is a German-language instrument to assess primary care competencies during specialty training and has so far been mainly used as a self-assessment tool. The aim of this study was (i) to test the application of the "Allgemeinarztbarometer" in the context of medical education as an external assessment tool (in its "Allgemeinarztbarometer A [ABA]" version) and (ii) to evaluate its basic psychometric properties.
Physicians involved in teaching were asked to assess medical students after a two-week internship in General Practice during their fifth year of study using the ABA (9-item external assessment version). After data processing and displaying basic distributions, we conducted exploratory factor analysis, followed by confirmatory factor analysis. The detected factor structure was then tested for internal consistency.
A total of 150 completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. One item showed a high number of missing values (response option "Not assessable"). Exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-factor structure ("Patient-oriented skills" and "General Practice decision-making"). Three items were not unambiguously assignable and hence erased. Confirmatory factor analysis validated the identified factor structure. The two factors showed a Cronbach's α of 0.73 and 0.84 (moderate to very good internal consistency).
Our study provides a first analysis of the ABA in the context of medical education. The detected two-dimensional structure shows a high goodness-of-fit when giving up three items still used in this survey. The analysis of missing data showed a high number of "I can't say" answers when assessing the development of strategies against burnout.
The ABA (6-item version) seems to be a suitable tool for the external assessment of General Practice competencies in the context of medical education. Further studies are needed to evaluate both the completeness of the assessment and the external assessability of certain items in the context of medical education.
医学教育与培训的主要目标是培养临床能力。基于能力的课程体系既存在于医学教育中(一旦当前改革实施,将更侧重于初级保健),也存在于全科医学的专科培训中。“全科医生晴雨表”是一种用于评估专科培训期间初级保健能力的德语工具,迄今为止主要用作自我评估工具。本研究的目的是:(i)在医学教育背景下测试“全科医生晴雨表”作为外部评估工具(其“全科医生晴雨表A [ABA]”版本)的应用,以及(ii)评估其基本心理测量特性。
参与教学的医生被要求在医学生五年级为期两周的全科实习后,使用ABA(9项外部评估版本)对他们进行评估。在数据处理并展示基本分布后,我们进行了探索性因素分析,随后进行验证性因素分析。然后对检测到的因素结构进行内部一致性测试。
分析共纳入150份完整问卷。有一项显示缺失值数量较多(回答选项“无法评估”)。探索性因素分析表明存在双因素结构(“以患者为导向的技能”和“全科医学决策”)。有三项无法明确归属,因此予以删除。验证性因素分析验证了所确定的因素结构。这两个因素的克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.73和0.84(内部一致性从中度到非常好)。
我们的研究首次在医学教育背景下对ABA进行了分析。当放弃本调查中仍使用的三项内容时,检测到的二维结构显示出较高的拟合优度。对缺失数据的分析表明,在评估应对职业倦怠策略的发展时,有大量“我说不准”的回答。
ABA(6项版本)似乎是医学教育背景下全科医学能力外部评估的合适工具。需要进一步研究以评估评估的完整性以及医学教育背景下某些项目的外部可评估性。