• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估白内障手术后早期和晚期术后访视时世界卫生组织结局标准的应用情况。

Evaluation of the World Health Organization outcome standards at the early and late post-operative visits following cataract surgery.

出版信息

Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;12(23):66-74. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v12i1.24906.

DOI:10.3126/nepjoph.v12i1.24906
PMID:32799241
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted to determine whether the World Health Organization (WHO) visual acuity standards are correlated between the early and late early post-operative periods following phacoemulsification (phaco) and small incision extracapsular cataract surgery (SICS). Secondary aims were to compare visual outcomes and complications following SICS and phaco.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study following phaco and SICS performed by one surgeon. Primary outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the early (≤72 hours) and late (≥21 days) post-operative visits. Secondary outcome measures included complications and astigmatism.

RESULTS

705 eyes were studied (509 phaco, 196 SICS). The correlation for UCVA between early and late follow-up examinations was higher for phaco (rs=0.58) compared to SICS (rs=0.45, p=0.04) while correlation for BCVA was similar (phaco,rs=0.52; SICS, rs=0.47; p=0.44). At the early post-operative visit, a higher proportion in the phaco group achieved ≥6/18 UCVA (81.5% phaco vs 64.8% SICS, p<0.0001) and BCVA (87.8% phaco vs 73.5% SICS, p<0.0001). At the late post-operative visit, a higher proportion following phaco also achieved ≥6/18 UCVA (93.9% phaco vs 85.2% SICS, p=0.0004) and BCVA (96.9% phaco vs 91.3% SICS, p=0.004). After exclusion of eyes with pre-existing ocular comorbidities, a similar proportion had ≥6/18 late UCVA (98.9% phaco vs 96.9% SICS, p=0.22) and BCVA (100% phaco vs 99.2% SICS, p=0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Early and late post-operative WHO visual acuity levels are correlated, but not equivalent, following both phaco and SICS. In eyes without comorbidities, similar final visual outcomes can be achieved after phaco and SICS.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在确定世界卫生组织(WHO)视力标准在白内障超声乳化术(phaco)和小切口囊外白内障摘除术(SICS)后的早期和晚期早期术后期间是否相关。次要目的是比较 SICS 和 phaco 术后的视力结果和并发症。

方法

对一位外科医生进行的 phaco 和 SICS 的回顾性队列研究。主要观察指标包括早期(≤72 小时)和晚期(≥21 天)随访时的未矫正视力(UCVA)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。次要观察指标包括并发症和散光。

结果

共研究了 705 只眼(509 只 phaco,196 只 SICS)。phaco 的早期和晚期随访检查之间的 UCVA 相关性高于 SICS(rs=0.58 与 rs=0.45,p=0.04),而 BCVA 的相关性相似(phaco,rs=0.52;SICS,rs=0.47;p=0.44)。在早期术后访视时,phaco 组中达到≥6/18 UCVA 的比例更高(81.5% phaco 与 64.8% SICS,p<0.0001)和 BCVA(87.8% phaco 与 73.5% SICS,p<0.0001)。在晚期术后访视时,phaco 组中达到≥6/18 UCVA 的比例也更高(93.9% phaco 与 85.2% SICS,p=0.0004)和 BCVA(96.9% phaco 与 91.3% SICS,p=0.004)。排除有预先存在的眼部合并症的眼睛后,晚期 UCVA 达到≥6/18 的比例相似(98.9% phaco 与 96.9% SICS,p=0.22)和 BCVA(100% phaco 与 99.2% SICS,p=0.27)。

结论

在 phaco 和 SICS 术后,早期和晚期术后 WHO 视力水平相关,但不等同。在没有合并症的眼睛中,phaco 和 SICS 后可以获得相似的最终视力结果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the World Health Organization outcome standards at the early and late post-operative visits following cataract surgery.评估白内障手术后早期和晚期术后访视时世界卫生组织结局标准的应用情况。
Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;12(23):66-74. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v12i1.24906.
2
Meta-analysis to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery and Phacoemulsification.比较手法小切口白内障手术与超声乳化白内障吸除术安全性和有效性的Meta分析
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;22(3):362-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.159763.
3
A prospective randomized clinical trial of phacoemulsification vs manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery in Nepal.尼泊尔白内障超声乳化术与手动无缝线小切口白内障囊外摘除术的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;143(1):32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.023. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
4
Validity of first post-operative day automated refraction following dense cataract extraction.白内障超声乳化吸出术后第一天自动验光的有效性
Clin Exp Optom. 2011 Mar;94(2):187-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00567.x. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
5
Controlled clinical trial comparing biaxial microincision with coaxial small incision for cataract surgery.比较双轴微切口与同轴小切口用于白内障手术的对照临床试验。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;22(5):739-50. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000100.
6
Visual Outcome of Phacoemulsification versus Small Incision Cataract Surgery in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome - A Pilot Study.假性剥脱综合征中行超声乳化白内障吸除术与小切口白内障手术的视力预后——一项初步研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):NC05-NC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22207.9311. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
7
[Clincal outcome in conversion from small incision sutureless to phacoemulsification cataract surgery].[小切口无缝线白内障手术转换为超声乳化白内障手术的临床结果]
Yan Ke Xue Bao. 2010 Aug;25(1):31-3. doi: 10.3969/g.issn.1000-4432.2010.01.008.
8
Phacoemulsification versus small incision cataract surgery in patients with uveitis.葡萄膜炎患者行超声乳化白内障吸除术与小切口白内障手术的对比
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct 18;8(5):965-70. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.05.20. eCollection 2015.
9
[Phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery: Anatomic and functional results].[超声乳化白内障吸除术与手法小切口白内障手术:解剖学和功能结果]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017 Jun;40(6):460-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 May 31.
10
Cataract surgery in aged patients: phacoemulsification or small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery.老年患者的白内障手术:超声乳化白内障吸除术或小切口白内障囊外摘除术。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4(5):513-8. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.05.11. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Manual small incision cataract surgery: An ergonomic solution to tackle cataract backlog and challenging situations.手法小切口白内障手术:解决白内障积压问题及应对复杂情况的一种人体工程学解决方案。
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):104529. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.104529.