Hautz Wolf E, Sauter Thomas C, Exadakytlos Aristomenis K, Krummrey Gert, Schauber Stefan, Müller Martin
Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland | 0041764693998.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Aug 11;150:w20331. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20331. eCollection 2020 Aug 10.
While COVID-19 significantly overburdens emergency rooms (ERs) and hospitals in affected areas, ERs elsewhere report a marked decrease in patient numbers. This study aimed to investigate the assumption that patients with urgent problems currently avoid the ER.
Electronic health records from the ER of a large Swiss university hospital were extracted for three periods: first, the awareness phase (ap) from the publication of the national government’s initiative “How to protect ourselves” on 1 March 2020 to the lockdown of the country on 16 March; second, the mitigation phase (mp) from 16–30 March; finally, patients presenting in March 2019 were used as a control group. We compared parameters including a critical illness as the discharge diagnosis (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis and ER death) using logistic and linear regression, as well as 15-day bootstrapped means and 95% confidence intervals for the control group.
In the three periods, a total of 7143 patients were treated. We found a 24.9% (42.5%) significant decline in the number of patients presenting during the ap (mp). Patients presenting during the mp were more likely to be critically ill. There was an increase of 233% and 367% (ap and mp, respectively) of ER deaths (none related to COVID-19) compared with the control period. Apart from polytrauma (increase of 5% in the mp), all other critical illnesses as discharge diagnosis showed a lower incidence in descriptive analysis. Significantly more patients died in the ER in both the ap and mp.
Barriers to seeking emergency care during COVID-19 pandemic may lead to higher morbidity and mortality. Healthcare authorities and hospitals must ensure low barriers to treatment and business as usual for all patients.
虽然新冠疫情给受影响地区的急诊室和医院带来了巨大负担,但其他地区的急诊室报告称患者数量显著减少。本研究旨在调查当前有紧急问题的患者避开急诊室这一假设。
提取了瑞士一家大型大学医院急诊室三个时期的电子健康记录:第一,从2020年3月1日国家政府发布“如何保护自己”倡议到3月16日国家封锁的认知阶段(ap);第二,3月16日至30日的缓解阶段(mp);最后,将2019年3月就诊的患者作为对照组。我们使用逻辑回归和线性回归比较了包括出院诊断为危重病(如心肌梗死、中风、败血症和急诊室死亡)在内的参数,以及对照组的15天自抽样均值和95%置信区间。
在这三个时期,共治疗了7143名患者。我们发现,在认知阶段(缓解阶段)就诊的患者数量显著下降了24.9%(42.5%)。在缓解阶段就诊的患者更有可能患有危重病。与对照期相比,急诊室死亡人数在认知阶段和缓解阶段分别增加了233%和367%(均与新冠疫情无关)。除了多发伤(缓解阶段增加了5%),在描述性分析中,所有其他出院诊断为危重病的发病率均较低。在认知阶段和缓解阶段,急诊室死亡的患者明显更多。
新冠疫情期间寻求紧急护理的障碍可能导致更高的发病率和死亡率。卫生当局和医院必须确保所有患者的治疗障碍较低且一切照常。