Suppr超能文献

如果强化基于栖息地偏好而非物种识别,那么物种共存会更容易。

Species coexist more easily if reinforcement is based on habitat preferences than on species recognition.

作者信息

Kyogoku Daisuke, Kokko Hanna

机构信息

Department of Science and Technology, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Japan.

Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

J Anim Ecol. 2020 Nov;89(11):2605-2616. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13321. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

Abstract

Maladaptive hybridization selects for prezygotic isolation, a process known as reinforcement. Reinforcement reduces gene flow and contributes to the final stage of speciation. Ecologically, however, coexistence of the incipient species is difficult if they initially use identical resources. Habitat segregation offers an alternative to species discrimination as a way to reduce gene flow: production of unfit hybrids is reduced if mate encounters become rare due to differing habitat choice. Using a modelling approach, we show that hybridization avoidance alone can select for habitat specialization, even if neither of the species is intrinsically better at using a specific niche. While habitat segregation and species discrimination both reduce the risk of producing unfit hybrids, these two isolation mechanisms differ from each other with respect to their effects on resource competition. Our model shows that, as a consequence of such differences, reinforcement evolves much more easily if hybridization is avoided based on habitat segregation than if the mechanism involves species recognition (mate choice traits). We also examine the outcomes when both isolation mechanisms evolve jointly. The establishment of one isolation mechanism a priori weakens selection for the other. However, an asymmetry persists here too. The net effect of habitat segregation on species discrimination was typically facilitative, but not vice versa. This asymmetry arises because habitat segregation, by enhancing coexistence, secures time for the subsequent evolution of species discrimination in a mate choice context (still relevant if habitat use is not perfectly segregated). Species discrimination does not have such a stabilizing effect on coexistence. Our results emphasize the importance of habitat segregation in reinforcement and offer a way to interpret findings where closely related taxa show similar performance on different resources or in different habitats. Studies of ecological generalization and specialization should therefore take into account that niche differences can be initiated and/or maintained by hybridization avoidance.

摘要

适应性不良的杂交会选择合子前隔离,这一过程被称为强化。强化会减少基因流动,并有助于物种形成的最后阶段。然而,从生态学角度来看,如果初始物种最初使用相同的资源,那么它们很难共存。栖息地隔离提供了一种替代物种识别的方式来减少基因流动:如果由于栖息地选择不同而导致交配相遇变得稀少,那么不适应的杂种的产生就会减少。通过建模方法,我们表明,仅避免杂交就可以选择栖息地特化,即使这两个物种在利用特定生态位方面都没有内在优势。虽然栖息地隔离和物种识别都降低了产生不适应杂种的风险,但这两种隔离机制在对资源竞争的影响方面彼此不同。我们的模型表明,由于这些差异,如果基于栖息地隔离来避免杂交,那么强化比如果该机制涉及物种识别(择偶特征)更容易进化。我们还研究了两种隔离机制共同进化时的结果。一种隔离机制的先验建立会削弱对另一种隔离机制的选择。然而,这里也存在不对称性。栖息地隔离对物种识别的净效应通常是促进性的,但反之则不然。这种不对称性的出现是因为栖息地隔离通过增强共存,为择偶背景下物种识别的后续进化确保了时间(如果栖息地利用没有完全隔离,这仍然是相关的)。物种识别对共存没有这样的稳定作用。我们的结果强调了栖息地隔离在强化中的重要性,并提供了一种方法来解释相关分类群在不同资源或不同栖息地表现出相似性能的研究结果。因此,对生态泛化和特化的研究应该考虑到生态位差异可以通过避免杂交来启动和/或维持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验