• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型固态钬激光碎石术与钬激光碎石术的粉尘性能比较。

Dusting Performance of a New Solid State Thulium Laser Compared to Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2021 Feb;35(2):221-225. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0525. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0525
PMID:32799650
Abstract

To examine the dusting performance of a novel solid state Thulium laser device compared to a standard holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) device. This study compares a Dornier Medilas H Solvo 35 with an evaluation model of a pulsed solid state thulium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Tm:YAG) laser (Dornier MedTech Laser GmbH, Wessling, Germany). The model consisted of a mold with irrigated water at 37°C. For 2-9 minutes, laser fibers were guided by an xy-plotter in spirals over BegoStones. Stone mass was measured before and after laser application. Comparisons to Ho:YAG and further Tm:YAG investigations were performed. Identical settings with similar pulse durations yielded a significant 14% advantage for Ho:YAG in slow fiber speeds and a tendency toward 15% higher efficiency of Tm:YAG in fast fiber speeds. Increased pulse duration in Tm:YAG led significantly to 32%-54% higher ablation rates in comparison to Tm:YAG in both setups. Ablated mass loss range is 102-1107 mg for slow fiber speeds and 22-528 mg for fast speeds. Mass loss is proportional to pulse energy, frequency, and pulse duration, whereas pulse energy defines the penetration depth into the model stones. Frequency characterizes the ablation homogeneity and possible working speeds. Tm:YAG is significantly more efficient when longer pulse durations are used. Identical settings revealed a strong connection to fiber movement speeds. In addition, the Tm:YAG device enables a broader range of settings with the possibility of minimal pulse energy of 100 mJ for low retropulsion and fine dusting with possible frequencies ≤200 Hz.

摘要

为了考察一种新型固态钬激光设备与标准掺钕钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)设备相比的撒粉性能。本研究比较了多尼尔 Medilas H Solvo 35 与脉冲固态掺铥钇铝石榴石(Tm:YAG)激光的评估模型(多尼尔医疗技术激光有限公司,德国魏斯灵)。模型由一个装有 37°C 水的模具组成。激光光纤在 xy 绘图仪的引导下,在 BegoStones 上以螺旋方式移动 2-9 分钟。在激光应用前后测量结石质量。对 Ho:YAG 进行了比较,并对进一步的 Tm:YAG 进行了研究。在相似的脉冲持续时间下,使用相同的设置,慢速光纤速度下 Ho:YAG 的优势明显提高了 14%,快速光纤速度下 Tm:YAG 的效率提高了 15%。在 Tm:YAG 中增加脉冲持续时间,与两种设置下的 Tm:YAG 相比,导致消融率分别显著提高了 32%-54%。慢速光纤速度下的消融质量损失范围为 102-1107mg,快速光纤速度下为 22-528mg。质量损失与脉冲能量、频率和脉冲持续时间成正比,而脉冲能量决定了模型结石的穿透深度。频率特征是消融的均匀性和可能的工作速度。当使用较长的脉冲持续时间时,Tm:YAG 的效率显著提高。相同的设置显示与光纤运动速度有很强的联系。此外,Tm:YAG 设备可以提供更广泛的设置范围,其最小脉冲能量为 100mJ,可用于低反冲和精细撒粉,可能的频率≤200Hz。

相似文献

1
Dusting Performance of a New Solid State Thulium Laser Compared to Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.新型固态钬激光碎石术与钬激光碎石术的粉尘性能比较。
J Endourol. 2021 Feb;35(2):221-225. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0525. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.激光碎石术中的后冲力——体外比较钬设备与新型脉冲固态铥激光的研究。
World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3651-3656. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03668-8. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
3
Temperature Assessment of a Novel Pulsed Thulium Solid-State Laser Compared with a Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser.新型脉冲铥固体激光器与钬:石榴石激光器温度评估的比较。
J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):853-859. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0803. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
4
Dusting Efficiency of a Novel Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser a Thulium Fiber Laser.新型脉冲掺铥钇铝石榴石激光与掺铥光纤激光的除尘效率
J Endourol. 2022 Feb;36(2):259-265. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0441. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
5
Gas Bubble Anatomy During Laser Lithotripsy: An Experimental Study of a Pulsed Solid-State Tm:YAG and Ho:YAG Device.激光碎石术中的气泡解剖结构:脉冲固态 Tm:YAG 和 Ho:YAG 设备的实验研究。
J Endourol. 2021 Jul;35(7):1051-1057. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0526. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
6
Stone Retropulsion with Ho: YAG and Tm: YAG Lasers: A Clinical Practice-Oriented Experimental Study.钬激光和铥激光碎石后推:一项以临床实践为导向的实验研究
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1145-1149. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0212.
7
Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.超脉冲铥光纤激光与钬:YAG 激光碎石术的临床前比较。
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02785-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
8
Comparison of Superpulse Thulium Fiber Laser Holmium Laser for Ablation of Renal Calculi in an Porcine Model.钬激光与超脉冲铥光纤激光碎石术治疗猪肾结石模型的比较。
J Endourol. 2023 Mar;37(3):335-340. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0445.
9
Pulsed Thulium:YAG laser - What is the lithotripsy ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones? Results from an in vitro PEARLS study.脉冲铥:钇铝石榴石激光 - 人类尿路结石碎石粉尘的碎石消融效率如何?来自体外 PEARLS 研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3723-3730. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04640-4. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
10
Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios.在真实场景中评估钬激光、铥光纤激光和铥钬激光治疗尿石症的实用性和性能。
World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2627-2636. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04487-9. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention and management of difficult ureteroscope withdrawal caused by ureteroscopic impaction: a narrative review.输尿管镜嵌顿导致输尿管镜取出困难的预防与处理:一篇叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Aug 30;14(8):2419-2427. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-208. Epub 2025 Aug 23.
2
Comparison of p-Tm:YAG, TFL and Ho:YAG's in vitro ablation rates on synthetic and human stones.p-Tm:YAG、TFL和Ho:YAG对合成结石和人体结石的体外消融率比较。
BJUI Compass. 2025 Aug 18;6(8):e70067. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70067. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Outcomes of holmium: YAG laser vs. Thulium fiber laser for ureteric stones during ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy - a prospective, randomized single-centre study.
输尿管镜碎石术中钬激光与铥光纤激光治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较——一项前瞻性、随机单中心研究
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 12;43(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05568-7.
4
Clinical efficacy and safety of the superpulse thulium fiber laser and holmium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized, positive control, blinded, single-center clinical study {1}.超脉冲铥光纤激光和钬激光用于输尿管镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效和安全性:一项随机、阳性对照、盲法、单中心临床研究 {1}。
Trials. 2024 Nov 25;25(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08362-9.
5
Thulium:YAG laser: a good compromise between holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser for endoscopic lithotripsy? A narrative review.钬:钇铝石榴石激光:内腔碎石术治疗中钬:钇石榴石激光和掺铥光纤激光之间的良好折衷?叙述性综述。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3437-3447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04679-3. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
6
Advances in lasers for the minimally invasive treatment of upper and lower urinary tract conditions: a systematic review.激光在上尿路和下尿路疾病微创治疗中的应用进展:系统评价。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3817-3827. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04669-5. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
7
Pulsed Thulium:YAG laser - What is the lithotripsy ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones? Results from an in vitro PEARLS study.脉冲铥:钇铝石榴石激光 - 人类尿路结石碎石粉尘的碎石消融效率如何?来自体外 PEARLS 研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3723-3730. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04640-4. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
8
Controversies in ureteroscopy: lasers, scopes, ureteral access sheaths, practice patterns and beyond.输尿管镜检查中的争议:激光、镜体、输尿管通路鞘、实践模式及其他
Front Surg. 2023 Sep 13;10:1274583. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1274583. eCollection 2023.
9
Flexible ureteroscopy for lower pole calculus: is it still a challenge?软性输尿管镜治疗下极结石:是否仍然具有挑战性?
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3345-3353. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04606-6. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
10
What to expect from the novel pulsed thulium:YAG laser? A systematic review of endourological applications.新型脉冲铥:钇铝石榴石激光的预期效果如何?腔内泌尿外科应用的系统评价。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3301-3308. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04580-z. Epub 2023 Sep 8.