TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;8(10):834-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan according to dose level achieved in the PIONEER-HF (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode) trial.
In patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), in-hospital initiation and continuation of sacubitril/valsartan as compared with enalapril is well tolerated, achieves a greater reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF through 8 weeks. However, not all patients achieve the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan, and its efficacy and safety in such patients are of interest.
PIONEER-HF was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in 881 patients stabilized during hospitalization for ADHF. Blinded study medication was administered for 8 weeks, with initial dosing selected based on the systolic blood pressure at randomization and titrated toward a target of sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg twice daily, or enalapril 10 mg twice daily, with an algorithm based on systolic blood pressure and the investigator's assessment of tolerability.
At 4 weeks, 199 (55%) patients allocated to sacubitril/valsartan and 211 (60%) patients allocated to enalapril were dispensed the target dose. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 treatment groups within each dose level. There was no heterogeneity across dose levels in the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the reduction in NT-proBNP (p = 0.69), the reduction in cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure (p = 0.42), or the pre-specified adverse events of special interest through 8 weeks.
In hemodynamically stabilized patients with ADHF, the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan are generally consistent across dose levels. (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode [PIONEER-HF]; NCT02554890).
本研究旨在评估依那普利相比,达格列净在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HF)患者中的疗效和安全性。
在因急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)住院的患者中,与依那普利相比,住院期间起始并持续应用沙库巴曲缬沙坦可更好耐受,降低 N 末端 B 型利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平,降低 HF 再住院或心血管死亡风险,持续 8 周。然而,并非所有患者均能达到沙库巴曲缬沙坦的目标剂量,因此该药物在这类患者中的疗效和安全性值得关注。
PIONEER-HF 是一项沙库巴曲缬沙坦对比依那普利治疗 ADHF 患者的随机、双盲、阳性对照试验,共纳入 881 例患者。患者随机分组后,接受盲法研究药物治疗 8 周,起始剂量根据随机时的收缩压选择,并滴定至沙库巴曲缬沙坦 97/103mg,每日 2 次,或依那普利 10mg,每日 2 次的目标剂量。滴定方案基于收缩压和研究者对耐受性的评估。
4 周时,沙库巴曲缬沙坦组 199 例(55%)和依那普利组 211 例(60%)患者达到目标剂量。两组中,每个剂量水平内的患者基线特征相似。不同剂量水平下,沙库巴曲缬沙坦对 NT-proBNP 降低的影响(p=0.69)、心血管死亡或 HF 再住院的降低(p=0.42)以及 8 周内特定不良事件的发生率无差异。
在血流动力学稳定的 ADHF 患者中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦的疗效和安全性与剂量水平相关。