TIMI Study Group, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.D.B., Y.G., E.B., D.A.M.).
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.D.S., A.D.D.).
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;14(2):e007034. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007034. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
In patients stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (HF), initiation of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril decreased the risk of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF without increasing the risk of adverse events. It is unknown whether potentially high-risk subpopulations have a similar risk-benefit profile.
PIONEER-HF (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide] in Patients Stabilized From an Acute HF Episode) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (n=440) versus enalapril (n=441) in patients stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated HF. The composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF was adjudicated. Safety outcomes included worsening renal function, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalemia. We evaluated heterogeneity in the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on these efficacy and safety outcomes in selected subgroups of clinical concern: patients with baseline systolic blood pressure ≤118 mm Hg (median; n=448), baseline NT-proBNP >2701 pg/mL (median; n=395), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/minute per 1.73 m (n=455), ≥1 additional hospitalization for HF within the prior year (n=343), admission to the ICU during the index hospitalization (n=96), inotrope use during the index hospitalization (n=68), and severe congestion (n=219).
The relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF with sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril was consistent across all high-risk subgroups ( interaction=non-significant [NS] for each). The risks of worsening renal function, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalemia with sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril were also consistent in each high- versus low-risk subgroup ( interaction=NS for each).
In high-risk subpopulations admitted for acute decompensated HF, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan after initial stabilization conferred a consistent reduction in cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF and was well tolerated.
在因急性失代偿性心力衰竭(HF)住院稳定的患者中,与依那普利相比,起始使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦可降低心血管死亡或因 HF 再住院的风险,而不增加不良事件的风险。目前尚不清楚高危亚人群是否具有类似的风险获益特征。
PIONEER-HF(比较急性 HF 发作住院稳定患者中沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利对 NT-proBNP[N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽]的影响)是一项多中心、随机、双盲试验,在因急性失代偿性 HF 住院稳定的患者中,比较沙库巴曲缬沙坦(n=440)与依那普利(n=441)的起始治疗。心血管死亡或因 HF 再住院的复合终点是裁定的。安全性结局包括肾功能恶化、症状性低血压和高钾血症。我们评估了沙库巴曲缬沙坦对以下选定临床关注亚组的疗效和安全性结局的影响的异质性:基线收缩压≤118mmHg(中位数;n=448)、基线 NT-proBNP>2701pg/mL(中位数;n=395)、估算肾小球滤过率<60mL/min/1.73m(n=455)、前 1 年因 HF 有≥1 次额外住院(n=343)、指数住院期间入住 ICU(n=96)、指数住院期间使用正性肌力药物(n=68)和严重充血(n=219)。
与依那普利相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦降低心血管死亡或因 HF 再住院的相对风险在所有高危亚组中均一致(各交互作用均无统计学意义[NS])。沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利相比,肾功能恶化、症状性低血压和高钾血症的风险在各高危与低危亚组中也一致(各交互作用均无统计学意义[NS])。
在因急性失代偿性 HF 住院的高危亚人群中,初始稳定后使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗可一致降低心血管死亡或因 HF 再住院的风险,且耐受性良好。