• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房插管患者口腔黏膜压力性损伤发展的风险预测模型:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Risk prediction models for the development of oral-mucosal pressure injuries in intubated patients in intensive care units: A prospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.

Department of Nursing, Pukyong National University, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

J Tissue Viability. 2020 Nov;29(4):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2020.06.002
PMID:32800513
Abstract

PURPOSE

Oral-mucosal pressure injury (PI) is the most commonly encountered medical device-related PIs. This study was performed to identify risk factors and construct a risk prediction model for oral-mucosal PI development in intubated patients in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

The study design was prospective, observational with medical record review. The inclusion criteria stipulated that 1) participants should be > 18 years of age, 2) there should be ETT use with holding methods including adhesive tape, gauze tying, and commercial devices. Data of 194 patient-days were analysed. The identification and validation of risk model development was performed using SPSS and the SciKit learn platform.

RESULTS

The risk prediction logistic models were composed of three factors (bite-block/airway, commercial ETT holder, and corticosteroid use) for lower oral-mucosal PI development and four factors (commercial ETT holder, vasopressor use, haematocrit, and serum albumin level) for upper oral-mucosal PI development among 10 significant input variables. The sensitivity and specificity for lower oral-mucosal PI development were 85.2% and 76.0%, respectively, and those for upper oral-mucosal PI development were 60.0% and 89.1%, respectively. Based on the results of the machine learning, the upper oral-mucosal PI development model had an accuracy of 79%, F1 score of 88%, precision of 86%, and recall of 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of lower oral-mucosal PIs is affected by immobility-related factors and corticosteroid use, and that of upper oral-mucosal PIs by undernutrition-related factors and ETT holder use. The high sensitivities of the two logit models comprise important minimum data for positively predicting oral-mucosal PIs.

摘要

目的

口腔黏膜压力性损伤(PI)是最常见的与医疗器械相关的 PI。本研究旨在确定 ICU 插管患者口腔黏膜 PI 发生的危险因素,并构建风险预测模型。

方法

研究设计为前瞻性、观察性病历回顾。纳入标准规定:1)参与者年龄应大于 18 岁,2)应使用 ETT 并采用胶带、纱布捆绑和商业设备等固定方法。共分析了 194 个患者日的数据。使用 SPSS 和 SciKit learn 平台对风险模型的识别和验证进行了分析。

结果

低口腔黏膜 PI 发展的风险预测逻辑模型由三个因素(咬块/气道、商业 ETT 固定器和皮质类固醇使用)组成,而上口腔黏膜 PI 发展的风险预测逻辑模型由 10 个重要输入变量中的四个因素(商业 ETT 固定器、血管加压素使用、红细胞压积和血清白蛋白水平)组成。低口腔黏膜 PI 发展的敏感性和特异性分别为 85.2%和 76.0%,而上口腔黏膜 PI 发展的敏感性和特异性分别为 60.0%和 89.1%。基于机器学习的结果,上口腔黏膜 PI 发展模型的准确性为 79%,F1 得分为 88%,精度为 86%,召回率为 91%。

结论

低口腔黏膜 PI 的发生与固定相关因素和皮质类固醇使用有关,而上口腔黏膜 PI 的发生与营养不良相关因素和 ETT 固定器使用有关。两种逻辑模型的高敏感性包含了对口腔黏膜 PI 进行阳性预测的重要最小数据。

相似文献

1
Risk prediction models for the development of oral-mucosal pressure injuries in intubated patients in intensive care units: A prospective observational study.重症监护病房插管患者口腔黏膜压力性损伤发展的风险预测模型:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2020 Nov;29(4):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
2
Oral mucosa pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients: A preliminary observational study of incidence and risk factors.重症监护病房患者的口腔黏膜压疮:一项关于发病率和危险因素的初步观察性研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2019 Feb;28(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
3
Development and validation of a nomogram for oral mucosal membrane pressure injuries in ICU patients: A prospective cohort study.开发和验证 ICU 患者口腔黏膜压力性损伤的列线图:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Oct;33(10):4112-4123. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17296. Epub 2024 May 26.
4
Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?哪种气管插管位置能将与器械相关的压疮风险降到最低:口腔中央还是角落?
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):268-276. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13267. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
5
Under (less) pressure - Facial pressure ulcer development in ventilated ICU patients: A prospective comparative study comparing two types of endotracheal tube fixations.在(较小)压力下 - 通气 ICU 患者面部压疮的发展:两种气管内导管固定方法的前瞻性比较研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Jun;58:102804. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102804. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
6
The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial.胶带与气管内导管固定器对危重症成人的影响:气管内导管固定(ETTS)随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2019 May 7;23(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2440-7.
7
Characteristics and risk factors of nasal mucosal pressure injury in intensive care units.重症监护病房鼻黏膜压力性损伤的特征及危险因素
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):346-356. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16193. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
Medical device-related pressure injuries in intensive care patients: A prospective and descriptive study.重症监护患者与医疗器械相关的压力性损伤:一项前瞻性描述性研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2024 May;33(2):275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
9
[Sinusitis in long-term intubated, intensive care patients: nasal versus oral intubation].[长期气管插管的重症监护患者的鼻窦炎:经鼻插管与经口插管]
Anaesthesist. 1991 Feb;40(2):100-4.
10
Inter-rater reliability of descriptors for the classification of mucosal pressure injury: A prospective cross-sectional study.黏膜压力性损伤分类描述符的观察者间可靠性:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Mar;36(2):179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.12.004. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of Braden scale combined with hemoglobin and hematocrit for oral mucosal pressure injury risk in ICU patients.Braden量表联合血红蛋白和血细胞比容对ICU患者口腔黏膜压力性损伤风险的预测价值
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4744-4753. doi: 10.62347/XJAM4799. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of an explainable machine learning model for predicting device-related pressure injuries in clinical settings.开发一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测临床环境中与设备相关的压力性损伤。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 9;25(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03090-9.
3
Innovative Tracheal Tube Design Enhances Oral Health in Intubated Patients.
创新气管导管设计改善插管患者的口腔健康。
Int Wound J. 2025 Jul;22(7):e70701. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70701.
4
Incidence of, and factors associated with, oral mucous membrane medical device-related pressure injury in critically ill patients with orotracheal intubation: a prospective cohort study.经口气管插管重症患者口腔黏膜医疗器械相关压力性损伤的发生率及相关因素:一项前瞻性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e098114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098114.
5
Pressure Injury Prediction in Intensive Care Units Using Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.使用人工智能预测重症监护病房中的压力性损伤:一项范围综述。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(4):126. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15040126.
6
Nomogram model for predicting pressure injury in COPD patients using SII: a Chinese clinical study.使用全身炎症反应指数(SII)预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者压力性损伤的列线图模型:一项中国临床研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 14;12:1564099. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1564099. eCollection 2025.
7
Development and Evaluation of an ICU Nurse Training Program on Oral Mucosal Pressure Injury Prevention and Management Using the ADDIE Model.使用ADDIE模型开发和评估重症监护病房护士预防和管理口腔黏膜压力性损伤培训项目
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Feb 7;18:363-372. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S499606. eCollection 2025.
8
Characteristics of oral mucosal pressure injuries in children with orotracheal intubation in intensive care units: An observational study.重症监护病房中经口气管插管儿童口腔黏膜压力性损伤的特征:一项观察性研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13174. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13174. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
9
Implementable Prediction of Pressure Injuries in Hospitalized Adults: Model Development and Validation.住院成人压力性损伤的可实施预测:模型开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 8;12:e51842. doi: 10.2196/51842.
10
Systematic Review for Risks of Pressure Injury and Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法对压力性损伤风险和预测模型的系统评价。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;13(17):2739. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172739.