Zhai You, Wu Lihua, Zheng Yunliang, Wu Minglan, Huang Yujie, Huang Qian, Shentu Jianzhong, Zhao Qingwei, Liu Jian
Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Drug Evaluation and Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Aug 4;14:3131-3142. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S258173. eCollection 2020.
This study compares the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between a new generic and a branded reference formulation of amitriptyline hydrochloride tablets, and assesses the bioequivalence of the two products in healthy Chinese volunteers to obtain sufficient evidence for the marketing approval of the generic drug.
A randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03646526) was conducted under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers (24 subjects/condition). Eligible subjects randomly received a single 25 mg dose of either the test or the reference formulation, followed by a 3-week washout period. Blood samples were collected until 144 h following administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters were acquired based on the concentration-time profiles, including the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC, AUC), the peak plasma concentration (C), the time to achieve C (T), and the elimination half-life (t). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of amitriptyline were acquired for bioequivalence analysis, and values of these parameters for nortriptyline were used for comparison of therapeutic outcomes. Safety assessments included laboratory tests, physical examination, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events (AEs).
The values of t and T for amitriptyline were not significantly different between the test and reference products under both fasting and fed conditions (P > 0.05). The GMRs of C, AUC, and AUC between the two products, and corresponding 90% CIs, were all within the range of 80% to 125% under both fasting and fed conditions. The test and reference products were well tolerated and did not elicit serious adverse events.
This study demonstrated that the generic and reference products were well tolerated by the subjects and bioequivalent, according to the rate and extent of the drug absorption.
本研究比较了盐酸阿米替林片新通用制剂与品牌参比制剂之间的药代动力学和安全性特征,并评估了这两种产品在健康中国志愿者中的生物等效性,以获取该通用药物上市批准的充分证据。
在健康中国志愿者(每种条件24名受试者)中,于空腹和进食条件下进行了一项随机、开放标签、两周期交叉研究(clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03646526)。符合条件的受试者随机接受单次25mg剂量的试验制剂或参比制剂,随后有3周的洗脱期。给药后直至144小时采集血样。根据浓度-时间曲线获取药代动力学参数,包括血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC、AUC)、血浆峰浓度(C)、达到C的时间(T)以及消除半衰期(t)。获取阿米替林的几何平均比值(GMR)和相应的90%置信区间(CI)用于生物等效性分析,并使用去甲替林这些参数的值来比较治疗结果。安全性评估包括实验室检查、体格检查、生命体征以及不良事件(AE)的发生率。
在空腹和进食条件下,试验产品与参比产品的阿米替林t和T值均无显著差异(P>0.05)。两种产品之间C、AUC和AUC的GMR以及相应的90%CI在空腹和进食条件下均在80%至125%范围内。试验产品和参比产品耐受性良好,未引发严重不良事件。
本研究表明,根据药物吸收的速率和程度,通用产品和参比产品受试者耐受性良好且生物等效。