• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高难度选择与平行计划:医学生选修策略与住院医师匹配结果之间的关系。

High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes.

作者信息

Courneya Carol Ann, Cheung Winson, McMillan M Janette

机构信息

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e4-e12. doi: 10.36834/cmej.53018. eCollection 2020 Jul.

DOI:10.36834/cmej.53018
PMID:32802222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7378142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical students are anxious about not getting a preferred residency position. We described elective patterns of two recent cohorts and examined associated match outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the final-year electives of all students who participated in the residency match (first iteration) at one school for 2017 and 2018. We categorized elective patterns and associated them with aggregated match outcomes. We examined high-demand/low-supply (HDLS) disciplines separately.

RESULTS

We described three elective patterns: High Dive, Parallel Plan(s), and No Clear Pattern. Many students had High Dive and Parallel Plans patterns; only a few showed No Clear Pattern. Match rates for High Dive and Parallel Plan patterns were high but many students matched to Family and Internal Medicine. When we separated out HDLS predominance, the match rate remained high but a significant number matched to disciplines in which they did not have a majority of electives. Most High Dive and Parallel Plan students who went unmatched did so with HDLS discipline electives.

CONCLUSION

Many students chose High Dive and Parallel Plan strategies to both high-capacity and HDLS disciplines. Match rates were high for both patterns but students also matched to non-primary disciplines. Back-up planning may reside in the entire application, and not just electives selection.

摘要

背景

医学生担心无法获得理想的住院医师职位。我们描述了最近两届学生的选修模式,并研究了相关的匹配结果。

方法

我们对2017年和2018年在一所学校参加住院医师匹配(首轮)的所有学生的最后一年选修课进行了回顾性研究。我们对选修模式进行了分类,并将其与汇总的匹配结果相关联。我们分别研究了高需求/低供应(HDLS)学科。

结果

我们描述了三种选修模式:“高风险型”、“平行计划型”和“无明确模式型”。许多学生采用“高风险型”和“平行计划型”模式;只有少数学生表现为“无明确模式型”。“高风险型”和“平行计划型”模式的匹配率很高,但许多学生匹配到了家庭医学和内科专业。当我们区分出HDLS优势学科时,匹配率仍然很高,但有相当一部分学生匹配到了他们选修课程中占比不多的学科。大多数未匹配成功的“高风险型”和“平行计划型”学生是因为选择了HDLS学科的选修课。

结论

许多学生对高容量学科和HDLS学科都采用了“高风险型”和“平行计划型”策略。两种模式的匹配率都很高,但学生也匹配到了非主要学科。后备计划可能存在于整个申请过程中,而不仅仅是选修课的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/7378142/2f338f86cab3/CMEJ-11-e004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/7378142/17d84c4a9fe1/CMEJ-11-e004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/7378142/2f338f86cab3/CMEJ-11-e004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/7378142/17d84c4a9fe1/CMEJ-11-e004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/7378142/2f338f86cab3/CMEJ-11-e004-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
High dives and parallel plans: Relationships between medical student elective strategies and residency match outcomes.高难度选择与平行计划:医学生选修策略与住院医师匹配结果之间的关系。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e4-e12. doi: 10.36834/cmej.53018. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Fundamental trends within falling match rates: Insights from the past decade of Canadian residency matching data.匹配率下降的基本趋势:来自加拿大住院医师匹配数据过去十年的见解。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e31-e42. doi: 10.36834/cmej.69289. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Ensuring the Health, Safety and Preparedness of U.S. Medical Students Participating in Global Health Electives Overseas.确保参加海外全球健康选修课程的美国医学生的健康、安全与防范能力。
J Community Health. 2016 Apr;41(2):442-50. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0169-7.
4
An analysis of free-choice electives in an undergraduate medical degree.本科医学学位中自由选择选修课的分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0955-7.
5
Medical students' preparation for the transition to postgraduate training through final year elective rotations.医学生通过最后一年的选修轮转课程为过渡到研究生培训做准备。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;34(5):Doc65. doi: 10.3205/zma001142. eCollection 2017.
6
Medical students from German-speaking countries on abroad electives in Africa: destinations, motivations, trends and ethical dilemmas.德语国家医学生在非洲海外实习:目的地、动机、趋势和伦理困境。
Hum Resour Health. 2022 Jan 17;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00707-2.
7
German-speaking medical students on international electives: an analysis of popular elective destinations and disciplines.德语国家医学生国际实习项目:热门实习目的地和学科分析。
Global Health. 2021 Aug 16;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00742-z.
8
Post-CaRMS match survey for fourth year medical students.针对四年级医学生的加拿大住院医师匹配服务(CaRMS)后调查。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e101-e110. doi: 10.36834/cmej.69330. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Do audition electives impact match success?选修听力课程会影响匹配成功率吗?
Med Educ Online. 2016 Jun 13;21:31325. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31325. eCollection 2016.
10
Virtual Med-Peds: Description of the First Virtual Med-Peds Student Elective During COVID-19.虚拟医学-儿科学:COVID-19期间首个虚拟医学-儿科学学生选修课的描述
Cureus. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):e11971. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11971.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in ophthalmology applicants going unmatched in the Canadian Resident Matching Service.眼科申请人在加拿大住院医师匹配服务中未匹配的趋势。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):62-67. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77287. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
A Canadian survey of residency applicants' and interviewers' perceptions of the 2021 CaRMS R1 virtual interviews.一项针对住院医师申请人和面试官对 2021 年 CaRMS R1 虚拟面试看法的加拿大调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 30;23(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04397-9.
3
"We regret to inform you that you did not match": Reflections on how to improve the match experience.

本文引用的文献

1
The unmatched.无与伦比的。
Can Med Educ J. 2018 May 31;9(2):e89-e92. eCollection 2018 May.
2
Unmatched U.S. Allopathic Seniors in the 2015 Main Residency Match: A Study of Applicant Behavior, Interview Selection, and Match Outcome.2015年美国全科医学高年级学生未匹配到主要住院医师岗位情况:申请人行为、面试选拔及匹配结果研究
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):991-997. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001501.
3
Orthopaedic Surgery Residency: Perspectives of Applicants and Program Directors on Medical Student Away Rotations.骨科住院医师培训:医学生轮转实习期间申请人与项目主任的观点
“我们很遗憾地通知您,您未匹配成功”:关于如何改善匹配体验的思考
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e129-e132. doi: 10.36834/cmej.69322. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Post-CaRMS match survey for fourth year medical students.针对四年级医学生的加拿大住院医师匹配服务(CaRMS)后调查。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e101-e110. doi: 10.36834/cmej.69330. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
Fundamental trends within falling match rates: Insights from the past decade of Canadian residency matching data.匹配率下降的基本趋势:来自加拿大住院医师匹配数据过去十年的见解。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e31-e42. doi: 10.36834/cmej.69289. eCollection 2020 Jul.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Jan;25(1):61-68. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00099.
4
Residency Placement Fever: Is It Time for a Reevaluation?住院医师匹配热潮:是时候重新评估了吗?
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):923-926. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001468.
5
Going "Fourth" From Medical School: Fourth-Year Medical Students' Perspectives on the Fourth Year of Medical School.从医学院毕业:四年级医学生对医学院四年级的看法。
Acad Med. 2015 Oct;90(10):1386-93. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000802.
6
Seeking a better (residency) match.寻求更理想的(住院医师培训)匹配。
CMAJ. 2014 Sep 16;186(13):979-80. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4843. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
7
Students' perspectives on the fourth year of medical school: a mixed-methods analysis.医学生对四年级学习生活的看法:混合方法研究。
Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):602-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000183.
8
The 'preresidency syndrome': an incipient epidemic of educational disruption.“住院医师岗前综合征”:一种初现端倪的教育中断流行病。
J Med Educ. 1985 Mar;60(3):201-2.
9
Fourth-year medical student rotations and the "pre-residency syndrome".医学四年级学生轮转实习与“住院医师岗前综合征”
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jul;74(1):130-2.