Liang Mei, Curtin Laurie S, Signer Mona M, Savoia Maria C
M. Liang is director of research, National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC.L.S. Curtin is chief policy officer, National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC.M.M. Signer is president and chief executive officer, National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC.M.C. Savoia is dean for medical education, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):991-997. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001501.
The application and interview behaviors of unmatched U.S. allopathic medical school senior students (U.S. seniors) participating in the 2015 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Main Residency Match were studied in conjunction with their United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores and ranking preferences to understand their effects on Match outcome.
USMLE Step 1 score and preferred specialty information were reviewed for U.S. seniors who responded to the 2015 NRMP Applicant Survey. Unmatched U.S. seniors were categorized as "strong," "solid," "marginal," or "weak" based on the perceived competitiveness of their Step 1 scores compared with U.S. seniors who matched in the same preferred specialty. The numbers of applications sent, interviews obtained, and programs ranked also were examined by Match outcome.
Strong unmatched U.S. seniors submitted significantly more applications to achieve and attend approximately the same number of interviews as strong matched U.S. seniors. Strong unmatched seniors ranked fewer programs than their matched counterparts. As a group, unmatched U.S. seniors were less likely than their matched counterparts to rank a mix of competitive and less competitive programs and more likely to rank programs based on their perceived likelihood of matching. A small number of unmatched U.S. seniors would have matched if they had ranked programs that ranked them.
U.S. seniors' Match outcomes may be affected by applicant characteristics that negatively influence their selection for interviews, and their difficulties may be exacerbated by disadvantageous ranking behaviors.
研究未匹配的美国opathic医学院高年级学生(美国高年级学生)在2015年全国住院医师匹配计划(NRMP)主住院医师匹配中的申请和面试行为,以及他们的美国医学执照考试(USMLE)第一步成绩和排名偏好,以了解它们对匹配结果的影响。
回顾了对2015年NRMP申请人调查做出回应的美国高年级学生的USMLE第一步成绩和首选专业信息。根据未匹配的美国高年级学生与在相同首选专业中匹配的美国高年级学生相比,其第一步成绩的竞争力,将他们分为“强”、“稳固”、“边缘”或“弱”四类。还按匹配结果检查了发送的申请数量、获得的面试数量和排名的项目。
未匹配的强美国高年级学生提交了更多的申请,以获得与匹配的强美国高年级学生大致相同数量的面试并参加面试。未匹配的强高年级学生排名的项目比匹配的同龄人少。总体而言,未匹配的美国高年级学生比匹配的同龄人更不可能对竞争激烈和竞争不那么激烈的项目进行混合排名,而更有可能根据他们认为的匹配可能性来排名项目。如果少数未匹配的美国高年级学生对给他们排名的项目进行排名,他们就会匹配。
美国高年级学生的匹配结果可能受到对他们面试选择产生负面影响的申请人特征的影响,而他们的困难可能会因不利的排名行为而加剧。