Zimmer Margaret A, Kaiser Kendra E, Blaszczak Joanna R, Zipper Samuel C, Hammond John C, Fritz Ken M, Costigan Katie H, Hosen Jacob, Godsey Sarah E, Allen George H, Kampf Stephanie, Burrows Ryan M, Krabbenhoft Corey A, Dodds Walter, Hale Rebecca, Olden Julian D, Shanafield Margaret, DelVecchia Amanda G, Ward Adam S, Mims Meryl C, Datry Thibault, Bogan Michael T, Boersma Kate S, Busch Michelle H, Jones C Nathan, Burgin Amy J, Allen Daniel C
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho.
WIREs Water. 2020 Apr 27;7(3). doi: 10.1002/wat2.1436.
Streamflow observations can be used to understand, predict, and contextualize hydrologic, ecological, and biogeochemical processes and conditions in streams. Stream gages are point measurements along rivers where streamflow is measured, and are often used to infer upstream watershed-scale processes. When stream gages read zero, this may indicate that the stream has fully dried; however, zero-flow readings can also be caused by a wide range of other factors. Our ability to identify whether or not a zero-flow gage reading indicates a dry fluvial system has far reaching environmental implications. Incorrect identification and interpretation by the data user can lead to hydrologic, ecological, and/or biogeochemical predictions from models and analyses. Here, we describe several causes of zero-flow gage readings: frozen surface water, flow reversals, instrument error, and natural or human-driven upstream source losses or bypass flow. For these examples, we discuss the implications of zero-flow interpretations. We also highlight additional methodss for determining flow presence, including direct observations, statistical methods, and hydrologic models, which can be applied to interpret causes of zero-flow gage readings and implications for reach- and watershed-scale dynamics. Such efforts are necessary to improve our ability to understand and predict surface flow activation, cessation, and connectivity across river networks. Developing this integrated understanding of the wide range of possible meanings of zero-flows will only attain greater importance in a more variable and changing hydrologic climate.
流量观测可用于理解、预测和情境化溪流中的水文、生态和生物地球化学过程及状况。溪流测量站是沿河流进行流量测量的点测量站点,常用于推断上游流域尺度的过程。当溪流测量站读数为零时,这可能表明溪流已完全干涸;然而,零流量读数也可能由多种其他因素导致。我们识别零流量测量站读数是否表明河流系统干涸的能力具有深远的环境影响。数据使用者的错误识别和解释可能导致模型和分析得出的水文、生态和/或生物地球化学预测出现偏差。在此,我们描述了零流量测量站读数的几个原因:地表水冻结、水流逆转、仪器误差以及自然或人为导致的上游水源损失或旁通水流。对于这些例子,我们讨论了零流量解释的影响。我们还强调了确定水流是否存在的其他方法,包括直接观测、统计方法和水文模型,这些方法可用于解释零流量测量站读数的原因及其对河段和流域尺度动态的影响。此类努力对于提高我们理解和预测地表水流激活、停止以及河流网络连通性的能力至关重要。在更加多变和不断变化的水文气候中,对零流量的各种可能含义形成这种综合理解将变得愈发重要。