• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于改善癌症患者及其家庭照顾者生活质量的心理社会干预措施的系统评价。

A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life of people with cancer and their family caregivers.

作者信息

Gabriel Israel, Creedy Debra, Coyne Elisabeth

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery Griffith University Logan Campus Queensland Australia.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2020 Jun 28;7(5):1299-1312. doi: 10.1002/nop2.543. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.543
PMID:32802350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7424465/
Abstract

AIMS

To review the characteristics and effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on quality of life of adult people with cancer and their family caregivers.

DESIGN

A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched from 2009-2019 using key terms. Included studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.

RESULTS

1909 studies were retrieved with 12 studies included, involving 3,390 patients/caregivers. Interventions aimed to improve communication, behaviour change and setting short-term goals. Duration of interventions varied from 4-17 weeks. Highest benefit was gained from telephone interventions. Interventions based on interpersonal counselling appeared more effective than other approaches. Studies predominantly focused on psychological, physical and social domains of quality of life. Spiritual well-being received relatively little attention. A paradigm shift is needed to develop psychosocial interventions that incorporate spiritual well-being. More research is needed in developing countries.

摘要

目的

回顾心理社会干预对成年癌症患者及其家庭照顾者生活质量的特点和效果。

设计

采用PRISMA指南进行系统评价。

方法

2009年至2019年期间,使用关键词检索了7个数据库。纳入的研究使用定量研究质量评估工具进行评估。

结果

共检索到1909项研究,其中12项研究被纳入,涉及3390名患者/照顾者。干预措施旨在改善沟通、行为改变和设定短期目标。干预持续时间从4周至17周不等。电话干预获得的益处最大。基于人际咨询的干预措施似乎比其他方法更有效。研究主要集中在生活质量的心理、身体和社会领域。精神健康相对受到较少关注。需要进行范式转变以开发纳入精神健康的心理社会干预措施。发展中国家需要更多的研究。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life of people with cancer and their family caregivers.一项关于改善癌症患者及其家庭照顾者生活质量的心理社会干预措施的系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2020 Jun 28;7(5):1299-1312. doi: 10.1002/nop2.543. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Telephone interventions, delivered by healthcare professionals, for providing education and psychosocial support for informal caregivers of adults with diagnosed illnesses.由医疗保健专业人员进行的电话干预,旨在为患有确诊疾病的成年人的非正式护理人员提供教育和心理社会支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012533.pub2.
3
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
4
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
5
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
6
Effectiveness of technology-based psychosocial interventions for improving health-related outcomes of family caregivers of stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于技术的心理社会干预对改善脑卒中幸存者家庭照顾者健康相关结局的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Nov;33(11):4207-4226. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17370. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Systematic review of psychosocial interventions for adult cancer patients and their family caregivers in Sub-Saharan Africa.对撒哈拉以南非洲地区成年癌症患者及其家属照顾者的心理社会干预的系统评价。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2199062. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2199062.
9
Personally tailored activities for improving psychosocial outcomes for people with dementia in community settings.为社区环境中患有痴呆症的人群改善心理社会状况而量身定制的活动。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 17;8(8):CD010515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010515.pub2.
10
Effectiveness of mHealth-based psychosocial interventions for breast cancer patients and their caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于移动健康的心理社会干预对乳腺癌患者及其照顾者的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Feb;31(2):184-197. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231187432. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Does palliative care improve the quality of life for cancer patients in three tertiary hospitals in South Africa?姑息治疗是否能提高南非三家三级医院癌症患者的生活质量?
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Aug 28;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01861-9.
2
Psychological distress, body image, and nutritional status during hospitalization for gynecological cancer surgery: a prospective observational study.妇科癌症手术住院期间的心理困扰、身体形象和营养状况:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 21;33(9):802. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09862-3.
3
Exploring the role of spirituality and the meaning of life of family caregivers: a qualitative study in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparative Study on Perceived Stress, Coping, Quality of Life, and Hopelessness between Cancer Patients and Survivors.癌症患者与幸存者之间感知压力、应对方式、生活质量及绝望感的比较研究
Indian J Palliat Care. 2019 Jul-Sep;25(3):414-420. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_1_19.
2
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
3
Psychobiological factors of resilience and depression in late life.
探索家庭照顾者的精神性和生命意义:德国的一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jun 27;24(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03398-x.
4
What can we learn from the evidence of psychosocial support for carers of people with cancer and how do we advance our efforts? A meta-review study.我们可以从针对癌症患者照料者的社会心理支持证据中学到什么,以及我们如何推进这方面的工作?一项元综述研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01802-8.
5
Psychosocial interventions and health-related quality of life in adults with incurable cancer: systematic review.心理社会干预与不可治愈癌症成人患者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Aug 26;15(5):572-585. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-005043.
6
Addressing the Psychological Needs of Cancer Survivors and their Caregivers: During Treatment and Beyond.关注癌症幸存者及其照顾者的心理需求:治疗期间及之后。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Apr 1;26(4):1101-1104. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.4.1101.
7
Feasibility and preliminary effects of a socio-spiritual intervention for adults with cancer and their family caregivers: a pilot randomised controlled trial.一项针对成年癌症患者及其家庭照料者的社会精神干预的可行性及初步效果:一项试点随机对照试验
Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 Feb 18;19:1851. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1851. eCollection 2025.
8
Network analysis of quality of life among young and middle-aged Korean cancer survivors.韩国中青年癌症幸存者生活质量的网络分析
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Mar 7;12:100684. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100684. eCollection 2025 Dec.
9
Support based on psychoeducation intervention to address quality of life and care burden among caregivers of patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial.基于心理教育干预以改善癌症患者照料者生活质量和照料负担的支持:一项随机对照试验
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 27;16:1430371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1430371. eCollection 2025.
10
Posttreatment health interventions for adult cancer survivors and their families: an integrated review.成人癌症幸存者及其家庭的治疗后健康干预措施:综合评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 8;32(11):712. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08909-1.
晚年的韧性和抑郁的心理生物学因素。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0424-7.
4
Effects of a psychosocial intervention on the quality of life of primary caregivers of women with breast cancer.心理社会干预对乳腺癌女性初级护理人员生活质量的影响。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Feb;38:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
5
A translational approach to design effective intervention tools for informal caregivers of dependent cancer patients.为依赖癌症患者的非正式照护者设计有效干预工具的转化方法。
Public Health. 2019 Mar;168:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.11.013. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.**对偶干预与癌症患者结局的关联:一项荟萃分析**。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):745-761. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4556-8. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
A randomized trial of interpersonal psychotherapy, problem solving therapy, and supportive therapy for major depressive disorder in women with breast cancer.一项针对乳腺癌女性中重度抑郁障碍的人际心理治疗、问题解决治疗和支持性心理治疗的随机试验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):353-364. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4994-5. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
8
Assessing Spiritual Well-Being in Residential Aged Care: An Exploratory Review.评估养老院中的精神健康:探索性综述。
J Relig Health. 2019 Apr;58(2):372-390. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0717-9.
9
Patients' quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study.癌症积极治疗期间患者的生活质量:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 4;18(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4868-6.
10
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.参与患者以提高医疗质量:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z.