Ana Holowaychuk, MSc, OT(C), is Occupational Therapist, Department of Occupational Therapy, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Yolan Parrott, MSc, OT(C), is Occupational Therapist, Department of Occupational Therapy, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Am J Occup Ther. 2020 Sep/Oct;74(5):7405205070p1-7405205070p8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.119.040626.
Resuming driving after a change in functional ability is challenging for patients with a neurological condition. Although a combination of assessment tools has been suggested for use in driving evaluation, resources and availability of tools have been a problem.
To examine the predictive ability of two commonly used tools, the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test (MVPT) and the Trail Making Test, Parts A and B (TMTA and TMTB), on on-road driving performance.
Retrospective chart review of 82 patient charts between 2015 and 2016.
Local rehabilitation hospital.
Eighty-two patients with a primary neurological diagnosis (general neurological condition, n = 13; spinal cord injury, n = 11; stroke, n = 58).
MVPT, TMTA, and TMTB.
Among the patients, 36 passed and 46 failed the on-road evaluation. The TMTA and TMTB scores were significantly different between those who passed or failed the on-road evaluation. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the TMTB completion time was the only significant predictor of on-road driving performance (for the all-patient model, 66% prediction accuracy, -2 log-likelihood [LL] = 93.47, exp β = 0.98; for the stroke-only model, 76% prediction accuracy, -2LL = 59.61, exp β = 0.97).
Our findings suggest that the TMTB is a better predictor of on-road driving performance for patients with a neurological condition than the MVPT. The findings shed light on the importance of selecting proper tools when assessing driving performance. Future prospective studies with a wider array of predictive variables are recommended to support the present findings.
Occupational therapists should revisit the use of the MVPT in driving assessment and consider multiple assessment tools when evaluating and predicting driving performance.
对于患有神经疾病的患者来说,在功能能力发生变化后恢复驾驶是具有挑战性的。尽管已经提出了组合使用评估工具来进行驾驶评估,但资源和工具的可用性一直是个问题。
检查两种常用工具(无运动视觉感知测试(MVPT)和连线测试,A 和 B 部分(TMTA 和 TMTB))在道路驾驶性能上的预测能力。
对 2015 年至 2016 年之间的 82 名患者病历进行回顾性图表审查。
当地康复医院。
82 名患有原发性神经诊断的患者(一般神经状况,n=13;脊髓损伤,n=11;中风,n=58)。
MVPT、TMTA 和 TMTB。
在这些患者中,36 人通过了道路评估,46 人未通过。通过或未通过道路评估的患者的 TMTA 和 TMTB 分数有显著差异。逻辑回归分析显示,TMTB 完成时间是道路驾驶表现的唯一显著预测因素(对于所有患者模型,预测准确率为 66%,-2 对数似然(LL)=93.47,expβ=0.98;对于中风患者模型,预测准确率为 76%,-2LL=59.61,expβ=0.97)。
我们的研究结果表明,对于患有神经疾病的患者,TMTB 是道路驾驶性能的更好预测因素,而 MVPT 则不是。这些发现强调了在评估驾驶性能时选择适当工具的重要性。建议进行未来的前瞻性研究,纳入更多的预测变量,以支持本研究的发现。
作业治疗师应重新考虑在驾驶评估中使用 MVPT,并在评估和预测驾驶性能时考虑多种评估工具。