Korner-Bitensky N A, Mazer B L, Sofer S, Gelina I, Meyer M B, Morrison C, Tritch L, Roelke M A, White M
Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital Research Center, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 May-Jun;79(3):253-9. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200005000-00007.
The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of a visual-perception assessment tool, the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, to predict on-road driving outcome in subjects with stroke.
This was a retrospective study of 269 individuals with stroke who completed visual-perception testing and an on-road driving evaluation. Driving evaluators from six evaluation sites in Canada and the United States participated. Visual-perception was assessed using the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test. Scores range from 0 to 36, with a higher score indicating better visual perception. A structured on-road driving evaluation was performed to determine fitness to drive. Based on driving behaviors, a pass or fail outcome was determined by the examiner.
The results indicated that, using a score on the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test of < or =30 to indicate poor visual-perception and >30 to indicate good visual perception, the positive predictive value of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test in identifying those who would fail the on-road test was 60.9% (n = 67/110). The corresponding negative predictive value was 64.2% (n = 102/159). Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed that older age, low Motor-Free Visual Perception Test scores and a right hemisphere lesion contributed significantly to identifying those who failed the on-road test.
The predictive validity of the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test is not sufficiently high to warrant its use as the sole screening tool in identifying those who are unfit to undergo an on-road evaluation.
本研究旨在确定一种视觉感知评估工具——无动作视觉感知测试,预测中风患者道路驾驶结果的能力。
这是一项对269名完成视觉感知测试和道路驾驶评估的中风患者的回顾性研究。来自加拿大和美国六个评估地点的驾驶评估人员参与其中。使用无动作视觉感知测试评估视觉感知。分数范围为0至36分,分数越高表明视觉感知越好。进行了结构化的道路驾驶评估以确定驾驶适宜性。根据驾驶行为,由考官确定通过或不通过的结果。
结果表明,使用无动作视觉感知测试分数≤30分表示视觉感知差,>30分表示视觉感知良好,无动作视觉感知测试识别道路测试不及格者的阳性预测值为60.9%(n = 67/110)。相应的阴性预测值为64.2%(n = 102/159)。单因素逻辑回归分析显示,年龄较大、无动作视觉感知测试分数较低和右半球病变对识别道路测试不及格者有显著影响。
无动作视觉感知测试的预测效度不够高,不足以保证将其用作识别不适合进行道路评估者的唯一筛查工具。